BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 270A(6)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad22Chandigarh17Mumbai14Chennai12Jaipur9Delhi8Pune6Bangalore4Rajkot3Kolkata3Cochin2Lucknow2Indore2Hyderabad1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 1113Section 80G10Section 2509Section 143(3)7Addition to Income7Section 1476Section 12A4Exemption4Section 270A3Section 92C

M/S CARE INDIA SOLUTION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purpose

ITA 7437/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2026AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Sh. Pratik Arora, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Jain, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 25Section 250

charitable institution entitled to\nthe benefits of Sections 11 and 12 of the Act.\n9. Without prejudice to the abovementioned grounds of\nappeal, the Ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in not providing the\nbenefit of the provisions of Section 11 (2) of the Act while\ncomputing the total income of the Appellant.\nGeneral\n10. That

3
Deduction3
Disallowance3

M/S CARE INDIA SOLUTIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purpose

ITA 7439/DEL/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2026AY 2023-24
For Appellant: Sh. Pratik Arora, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Jain, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 25Section 250

charitable institution entitled to\nthe benefits of Sections 11 and 12 of the Act.\n9. Without prejudice to the abovementioned grounds of\nappeal, the Ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in not providing the\nbenefit of the provisions of Section 11 (2) of the Act while\ncomputing the total income of the Appellant.\nGeneral\n10. That

M/S CARE INDIA SOLUTION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purpose

ITA 7438/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2026AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Sh. Pratik Arora, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Jain, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 25Section 250

charitable institution entitled to\nthe benefits of Sections 11 and 12 of the Act.\n9. Without prejudice to the abovementioned grounds of\nappeal, the Ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in not providing the\nbenefit of the provisions of Section 11 (2) of the Act while\ncomputing the total income of the Appellant.\nGeneral\n10. That

NTT COMMUNICATIONS INDIA NETWORK SERVICES PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 16(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4311/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jan 2026AY 2020-21
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250Section 251Section 37(1)Section 80G

charitable trust registered\nunder Section 80G and if the same denied merely because such\npayment forms part of CSR, it would lead to double disallowance,\nwhich is not the intention of Legislature. Accordingly, we allow the\ndeduction of Rs. 24,09,100/- made to PM Care Fund as claimed by\nthe assessee u/s 80G of the Act. Thus, Ground

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES (INTERNATIONAL) PRIVATE LTD,HARYANA vs. CIRCLE 1(1), DELHI

ITA 789/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Dr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Vishal Goel, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rohit Anand, Sr. DR
Section 135Section 142(1)Section 234ASection 270ASection 37Section 80G

270A of the Act for misreporting of income. 3. The Agilent Technologies (International) Private Limited ("Agilent International" or "the aassessee" or "the Company") is a 100% subsidiary of Agilent Technologies International Europe, BV which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of Agilent Technologies Inc. The assessee is engaged in the provision of IT services & ITeS

AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), DELHI / NFAC, DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5912/DEL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Nov 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sudhir Pareek & Shri Manish Agarwalamway India Enterprises Private Dcit, Limited, Circle-1(1), Ground Floor, Elegance Tower, Vs. Delhi/Nfac. Plot No.8, Non Hierarchical Commercial, Jasola, Delhi-110025. Pan-Aaaca5603Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80GSection 92C

270A(8) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 15. The Ld. AO has erred on facts and law in charging interest w/s 234A, 34B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 16. The appellant raves for liberty to add fresh ground(s) of appeal and also to amend, alter, modify any of the ground(s) of appeal.” 5. Ground

NOIDA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-16(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4199/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jan 2026AY 2020-21
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 92C

charitable trust\nmade a provision for expense but did not claim the amount as applied income\nduring the year, question of disallowance of provision did not arise [LPB page\nnos. 1 to 8]\n-Sunil Dhirubhai Patel V. Income Tax Officer [ITA 1686/Ahd/2019] wherein the\nHon'ble tribunal observed that the question of making a disallowance arises only\nwhen

SCHOLARS INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT (E), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2003/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deysh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Anuj Garg, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

charitable trust enjoying registration u/s 12AA of the Act 2 Scholars International Educational Foundation consequentially eligible for exemption u/s 11 of the Act had claimed disallowance of depreciation on certain fixed assets as an application of income, ignoring the amendment brought u/s 11(6) of the Act w.e.f. 01.04.2015. This disallowance of deprecation was accepted by the assessee