BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 245D(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad38Kolkata18Allahabad16Pune5Indore2Jaipur2Delhi2Lucknow2Chennai2

Key Topics

Section 143(3)2Section 12A2Section 112Charitable Trust2Exemption2

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-06, NEW DELHI vs. SANTOSH TRUST, NEW DELHI

ITA 1427/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nSh. Suresh K. Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: \nSh. Mahesh Shah, CIT, DR
Section 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 69ASection 80G(5)(iv)

4\nITA No.1427/Del/2023 & CO 58/Del/2023\nSantosh Trust (AY: 2017-18)\nMrs. Kuilambal. Further that the assessee was granted exemption in\nterms of Section 80G(5)(iv) of the Act on 28.09.2011. The main object of\nthe trust is to impart medical education to the student with no\ndiscrimination of cast, religion or creed. In order to accomplish this\nphilanthropic objective

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MAHARAJI EDUCATION TRUST, GHAZIABAD

The appeal are dismissed

ITA 5138/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, C. AFor Respondent: Ms. Paramita M. Biswas[CIT]–
Section 11Section 12ASection 132Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69Section 69C

4 case is that the assessee is earning surplus year after year even though the assessee has submitted that it had applied 85% of its income every year for charitable purposes. Once the Commissioner had made the determination that the trust was a charitable one, the AO is not entitled to re-examine the question as to whether the trust