BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Allahabad16Pune7Delhi7Jaipur7Lucknow4Bangalore4Cuttack3Mumbai2Kolkata2Chennai2Ranchi1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 1112Section 14712Section 1488Section 13(1)(d)6Section 2636Section 69C3Exemption3Addition to Income3TDS3Section 260A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. SHREE RADHA KRISHAN CHARITABEL TRUST

ITA/383/2008HC Delhi30 Mar 2011

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA

Section 11Section 13(1)(d)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260A

charitable character. However, when the Assessing Officer (AO) was finalizing the income tax return for the Assessment Year 1997-98, he noticed that shares acquired by the trust amounting to `62.50 lacs were not disposed of within the time and they were hit by the provisions of Section 13(1)(d)(iii) of the Act. He, thus, reopened the assessment

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. SHREE RADHA KRISHAN CHARITABEL TRUST

ITA - 383 / 2008HC Delhi
2
Section 143(3)2
Charitable Trust2
30 Mar 2011
Section 11Section 13(1)(d)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260A

charitable character. However, when the Assessing Officer (AO) was finalizing the income tax return for the Assessment Year 1997-98, he noticed that shares acquired by the trust amounting to `62.50 lacs were not disposed of within the time and they were hit by the provisions of Section 13(1)(d)(iii) of the Act. He, thus, reopened the assessment

KAILASH GAHLOT,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as above

ITA 3431/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No.3431/Del./2023, A.Y. 2015-16 Kailash Gahlot Deputy Commissioner Of C-6/6172, Vasant Kunj, Income Tax, New Delhi Vs. Central Circle-4, Pan: Aajpg2849N New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Vinod Kumar Bindal, Ca Sh. Anmol Jha, Advocate Respondent By Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 28/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24/10/2025 Order Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am This Appeal Of The Assessee For Assessment Year (‘Ay’) 2015-16 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 30.09.2023 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, New Delhi [‘Cit(A)’].

Section 115BSection 132(4)Section 153DSection 69C

charitable trust was created by the appellant and his family members. The trust is running a school named Shri Ram International School where Shri Rohit Sharma is apparently working. The address of the author on the diary is the address of the appellant. The mobile no. 9810032340 written on the first of the diary belongs to Shri Rohit Kailash Gahlot

M/S. DAYANAND CONTRACTOR,ROHTAK vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, original

ITA 2807/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Kumar Kamal & Lalit MohanFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 263

144A has disallowed the credit of the TDS deducted in the name of the partner to the firm. The present appeal is against this action of the AO. Besides this the AO in his order has made an addition of Rs.2,41,563/- as the interest received by the 16 ITA.No.2806 & 2807/Del./2016 M/s. Dayanand, Contractor, V & PO Kharainti

M/S. DAYANAND CONTRACTOR,ROHTAK vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, original

ITA 2806/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Kumar Kamal & Lalit MohanFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 263

144A has disallowed the credit of the TDS deducted in the name of the partner to the firm. The present appeal is against this action of the AO. Besides this the AO in his order has made an addition of Rs.2,41,563/- as the interest received by the 16 ITA.No.2806 & 2807/Del./2016 M/s. Dayanand, Contractor, V & PO Kharainti

M/S. DAYANAND CONTRACTOR,ROHTAK vs. ITO, ROHTAK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2027/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.P. Jain

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, & Sh. Lalit Mohan, CAFor Respondent: Shri T. Vasanthan Sr. DR
Section 144A

144A has disallowed the credit of the TDS deducted in the name of the partner to the firm. The present appeal is against this action of the AO. Besides this the AO in his order has made an addition of Rs.2,41,563/- as the interest received by the appellant op account of income tax refund, and not disclosed

DCIT (E),, GHAZIABAD vs. M/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTIY,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2156/DEL/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Sh.A. D. Jain, Vice-Dr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Goswami, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 144Section 144A

144A.” ITA No. 2156/Del/207: A.Y. 2003-04: (By the Revenue) Following grounds have been raised by the Revenue: “1. The Ld. Commissioner Income Tax(Appeal) has erred in law and on facts in concluding that the sum of Rs.34,65,85,407/- and of Rs.32,61,33,230/- (Rs.32.61 crore), totaling to Rs.67,27,18,637/-, should have been charged