COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JAMNALAL BAJAJ FOUNDATION

trust property for charitable or religious purposes or set apart not more than 15% of that income for charitable or religious purposes. Once an accumulation to the extent of 15% of that income is made, the provisions of Section 11(1)(a) get exhausted. 12. However, and as one proceeds to sub-section (2), it becomes evident that the charitable

ADIT (E), NEW DELHI vs. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c

ITO (E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c

ADIT(E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c

IILM FOUNDAION,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT (EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c

ADIT(E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settlor, etc., contained in section 13(1)(c

ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S. SPACE AGE RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, MEERUT

In the result Ground No. 1 and 3 of the appeal of the revenue is allowed and ground No

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiacit, Space Age Research & Vs. Circle-2, Meerut Technology Foundation, Charitable Trust, Railway Road, Meerut Pan: Aabts7321M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Charitable Trust, Delhi 223 Taxmaan 71 (43 taxmann.com 300 (Del) wherein, it has been held that if in case of a trust it is found that provisions of section 13(1)(c)(ii) read with section 13(3) are not followed trust would loose its exemption in its entirety, which result that the assessment of its income will be made

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. CHARANJIV CHARITABLE TRUST

In the result both aspects of the first substantial question of law

Bench: It, Two By The Assessee Relating To The Assessment Years 2006-07 & 2007-08 & One By The Revenue Relating To The Assessment Year 2006-07. In Other Words, In Respect Of The Assessment Year 2006-07, There Were Cross- 2014:Dhc:1467-Db

Charitable Trust Vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) (Delhi), (2008) 297 ITR 66, the assessing officer took the view that there was a violation of Section 13(1)(c)(ii) read with Section 13(2

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

13(3) of the Act read as under:- Section 2 Definitions.— In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— xxx (15) “charitable purpose” includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility; Section13(1)(c)(ii) (1) Nothing contained in section 11 [or section 12] shall operate

M/S. MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,DEHRADUN vs. CIT, DEHRADUN

In the result we dismiss the appeal of the assessee

Bench: Shri S.K. Yadav & Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Year:

2(15) of the Income Tax Act 1961 "Charitable purpose includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit." (C } Clause 13{bb) inserted w.e.f. 1-4-1977 provided as under; "Nothing contained in section 11 or section 12 shall

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)-EXEMPTION, NEW DELHI vs. HAMDARD LABORATORIES (INDIA) , NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2016-17

Sections 11 and 12: a. trust for private religious purposes, which enures no public benefit: [Sec. 13(1)(a)] b. charitable trust created or established on or after 1-4-1962 for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste [Sec. 13(1)(b)] (other than scheduled castes/tribes, back ward classes or women and children). (Explanation 2) c

PATANJALI YOGPEETH (NYAS),DELHI vs. ADIT(EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri L. P. Sahu

trust as being charitable in nature, in the same breadth held that it fell under the sixth limb of the definition of charitable purpose given under section 2(15) of the Act, i.e. ‘advancement of any other object of general public utility’ and was covered within the mischief of proviso to that section. Applying the aforesaid proviso, the assessing officer/CIT

CALCOM INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri M. Balaganeshcalcom Institute Of Vs. Cit(Exemption), Management Development & New Delhi Training, C-41, Defence Colony, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aaatc0685K Assessee By : Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr. Adv Shri Shailesh Gupta, Ca Shri Madhur Aggarwal, Adv Revenue By: Ms. Rajinder Kaur, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 03/07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 09/07/2024

charitable by the ld. CIT(E). The provisions of section 13(1)(c ) r.w.s. 13(2) and 13(3) of the Act are not at all applicable in the instant case. The assessee trust

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION DELHI vs. IILM FOUNDATION

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

charitable or religious purposes is applied for the benefit of a person specified in sub-section (3) of Section 13. 22. By virtue of clause (c) of sub-section 2 of the Act if any amount is paid by way of a salary or allowance to a person, which is specified under sub-section (3) of Section 13

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION DELHI vs. IILM FOUNDATION

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

charitable or religious purposes is applied for the benefit of a person specified in sub-section (3) of Section 13. 22. By virtue of clause (c) of sub-section 2 of the Act if any amount is paid by way of a salary or allowance to a person, which is specified under sub-section (3) of Section 13

ACIT (E), NEW DELHI vs. HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION (INDIA), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

trust. According to him, once the provisions of section 11 are not applicable, such contributions have to be charged to tax in terms of section 164(2) of the Act and on this premise, Ld. CIT(A) rejected the contention of the assessee for exclusion of Rs.9,43,81,000/-. 19. It is submitted by the Ld. AR that from

HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION (INDIA),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

trust. According to him, once the provisions of section 11 are not applicable, such contributions have to be charged to tax in terms of section 164(2) of the Act and on this premise, Ld. CIT(A) rejected the contention of the assessee for exclusion of Rs.9,43,81,000/-. 19. It is submitted by the Ld. AR that from

HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION (INDIA),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

trust. According to him, once the provisions of section 11 are not applicable, such contributions have to be charged to tax in terms of section 164(2) of the Act and on this premise, Ld. CIT(A) rejected the contention of the assessee for exclusion of Rs.9,43,81,000/-. 19. It is submitted by the Ld. AR that from