BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

642 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10(22)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi642Mumbai569Karnataka479Chennai352Bangalore307Ahmedabad188Jaipur176Pune156Hyderabad128Chandigarh99Kolkata93Lucknow68Cuttack48Amritsar46Indore43Visakhapatnam36Cochin34Rajkot28Surat27Allahabad27Nagpur24Telangana19Raipur18Calcutta16Jodhpur16Agra15SC12Ranchi7Patna6Dehradun6Punjab & Haryana6Kerala5Panaji4Varanasi4Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2Guwahati1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 11109Exemption69Section 12A58Addition to Income45Section 143(3)29Section 234E28Section 143(1)26Section 2(15)25Charitable Trust25

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. AIPECCS SOCIETY

ITA/924/2009HC Delhi07 Oct 2015
For Appellant: Mr Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standing CounselFor Respondent: Mr Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with
Section 10Section 158BSection 260A

charitable objects. 59. In view of the aforesaid, the exemption under Section 10(22) of the Act cannot be denied to the Assessee only for the reason that it had been generating surpluses. 60. The next aspect to be considered is whether the investments made by the Assessee would disentitle the Assessee to the exemption under Section 10(22). Section

BHAGWANT SINGH CHARITABLE TRUST,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT(EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 642 · Page 1 of 33

...
Section 11(1)(d)24
Section 1221
Disallowance17
ITA 6920/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Delhi
17 Jul 2023
AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Batra, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Kanv Bali, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(c)Section 164(2)Section 2(15)

22] In view of the above, it is held that the amount of Rs. 38,29,535 spent by the assessee-trust in Hanover, Germany cannot be considered as application of the income of the trust in India for charitable purposes….[Para 31]” 8 Bhagwant Singh Charitable Trust 7. On going through both the orders, we hold that the ratio

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPT vs. THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY

ITA/1086/2005HC Delhi03 Apr 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 1Section 10Section 260A

22) of the Act was substituted by Section 10(23C)(vi) with effect from 1stApril, 1999, the assessee applied in (Form 56D) requesting for approval of exemption, under Section 10(23C)(vi) on 16.4.2007 for AY 2008-09 onwards. The Additional Director of Income Tax (E) issued show cause notice to the assessee directing it to file requisite evidence

DY.DIR. OF I.T. vs. SHANTI DEVI PROGRESSIVE EDU.SOCY

ITA - 93 / 1999HC Delhi10 Feb 2011
Section 10(22)

10(22) of the IT Act that the availability of the exemption should be evaluated each year to find out whether the institution existed during the relevant year solely for educational purpose and not for the purpose of profit. Any incidental surplus would, of course, not make it a profit making object, but the acid test is whether on overall

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, , CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2288/DEL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

10 also.” 38. Thus, applying the above ratio, the act of collecting the capitation fee if done by the said Sh. V. Mathiyalgan cannot be considered to be within the scope of his employment and in such an Saraswati Ammal Educational & Charitable Trust Vs. ACIT event, the Assessee trust cannot be held liable for the said

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2289/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

10 also.” 38. Thus, applying the above ratio, the act of collecting the capitation fee if done by the said Sh. V. Mathiyalgan cannot be considered to be within the scope of his employment and in such an Saraswati Ammal Educational & Charitable Trust Vs. ACIT event, the Assessee trust cannot be held liable for the said

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NOIDA, NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2291/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

10 also.” 38. Thus, applying the above ratio, the act of collecting the capitation fee if done by the said Sh. V. Mathiyalgan cannot be considered to be within the scope of his employment and in such an Saraswati Ammal Educational & Charitable Trust Vs. ACIT event, the Assessee trust cannot be held liable for the said

SARASWATHI AMMAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CENTRE CIRCLE II, NOIDA

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2181/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

10 also.” 38. Thus, applying the above ratio, the act of collecting the capitation fee if done by the said Sh. V. Mathiyalgan cannot be considered to be within the scope of his employment and in such an Saraswati Ammal Educational & Charitable Trust Vs. ACIT event, the Assessee trust cannot be held liable for the said

NATASHA CHOPRA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 16(1), DELHI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2290/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Delhi03 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

10 also.” 38. Thus, applying the above ratio, the act of collecting the capitation fee if done by the said Sh. V. Mathiyalgan cannot be considered to be within the scope of his employment and in such an Saraswati Ammal Educational & Charitable Trust Vs. ACIT event, the Assessee trust cannot be held liable for the said

NATASHA CHOPRA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-16(1), DELHI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2291/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Delhi03 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

10 also.” 38. Thus, applying the above ratio, the act of collecting the capitation fee if done by the said Sh. V. Mathiyalgan cannot be considered to be within the scope of his employment and in such an Saraswati Ammal Educational & Charitable Trust Vs. ACIT event, the Assessee trust cannot be held liable for the said

PATANJALI YOGPEETH (NYAS),DELHI vs. ADIT(EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 2267/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri L. P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv.; &For Respondent: Shri N. C. Swain, CIT [DR]
Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(5)Section 13Section 142Section 2(15)

section 10(22). The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was, therefore, justified.” (emphasis supplied) Further, according to Halsbury’s Laws of England (4th Edition, Volume 5, paragraph 522) the advancement and propagation of education and learning generally are charitable purposes, even in the absence of an element of poverty in the class of beneficiaries, but the trust

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JAMNALAL BAJAJ FOUNDATION

ITA/808/2017HC Delhi31 May 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(2)Section 11(3)(c)Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)

Section 11(3) of the Act again arose for consideration of the Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. J.K. Charitable Trust10. While answering the aforesaid question, the Allahabad High Court significantly observed as under:- “21. Now, the question is whether the donations made by the assessee-trust to other charitable trusts

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JAMNALAL BAJAJ FOUNDATION

ITA-808/2017HC Delhi31 May 2024
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(2)Section 11(3)(c)Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)

Section 11(3) of the Act again arose for consideration of the Allahabad High Court in Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. J.K. Charitable Trust10. While answering the aforesaid question, the Allahabad High Court significantly observed as under:- “21. Now, the question is whether the donations made by the assessee-trust to other charitable trusts

SUNSHINE EDUCATIONAL & DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT, EXEMPTION, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4727/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Delhi16 Dec 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Garg, CAFor Respondent: Shri H.K. Chaudhary, CIT DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 194Section 2(15)Section 251(2)Section 40

charitable purpose, then for the purpose of Section 11 it has to be treated as trust and income derived from carrying out such obligation has to be reckoned as income derived from property under the trust and therefore, on the ground also as raked by the ld. CIT (A), exemption u/s.11 cannot be denied. Accordingly, in view of the finding

GIAN SAGAR EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-27, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6054/DEL/2018[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Sept 2020

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6054/Del./2018 : Asstt. Year : Gian Sagar Educational & Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Charitable Trust, Flat No. 509, Tax, Central Circle-27, 5Th Floor, Indraprakash Building, New Delhi Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatg5827B Assessee By : Sh. Amol Sinha, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Sunita Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.08.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 03.09.2020

For Appellant: Sh. Amol Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

10 Gian Sagar Educational & Charitable Trust cancellation of the registration of the assessee trust by the Pr. CIT is wholly unsustainable in law. It was submitted that u/s 12AA(3) of the Act, registration can be cancelled only when the Principal Commissioner is satisfied that activities of such trust or institution are not genuine or are not being carried

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. ANIKA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,

ITA/99/2018HC Delhi31 Jan 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 32Section 80G

10(23C) which, it is well settled, is a provision closely interlinked to Section 80-G. Where the two expressions "charitable purpose" and "not for purposes of profit" are used in the same statute, in cognate provisions, even if situated at some distance from each other, they cannot be accorded the same meaning, without due justification. In the present case

JCIT(OSD)(E) CIRCLE-2(1), NEW DELHI vs. POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1805/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.N.Barnwal, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 10(230)(iv)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 2(15)

trust, society, or other association of persons established for charitable purposes. However, such exemption is subject to certain conditions and requirements, and the Commissioner of Income tax (Exemptions) has the power to grant or revoke the approval of such exemption. In the present case, the assessment order was made based on the order of the Commissioner of income tax (exemptions

ADIT(OSD)(E), NEW DELHI vs. BIRD EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRAVEL & TOURISM, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2131/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri K.K. Jaiswal, DRFor Respondent: Shri Aditya Roy Singh, Advocate
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)

section 10(22) of the Act. The following extract from the said judgment brings out this fact:- "It is significant to note that while a trust holding property for a charitable

CONFRERE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4464/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Anubhav Sharma

Section 12ASection 250Section 251Section 56

charitable purpose, then for the purpose of Section 11 it has to be treated as trust and income derived from carrying out such obligation has to be reckoned as income derived from property under the trust and therefore, on the ground also as raked by the ld. CIT (A), exemption u/s.11 cannot be denied. Accordingly, in view of the finding

MOOL CHAND KHAIRATI RAM TRUST vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)

The appeal is disposed of

ITA/141/2013HC Delhi27 Jul 2015
For Appellant: Mr C.S. Aggarwal, Senior Advocate withFor Respondent: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Junior Standing Counsel
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 260A

22. We are unable to accept the contention that the expression “such purposes” would mean any charitable or religious purpose, even if the said purpose is not the purpose for which the property is held in Trust. The contention that as long as the Assessee applies the income from a property held in Trust for charitable or religious purpose