BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 50Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai16Bangalore9Delhi7Chennai6Hyderabad5Ahmedabad4Kolkata3Karnataka2Surat1Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 54F18Section 27Section 2637Capital Gains6Long Term Capital Gains6Section 50C5Deduction4Section 453Addition to Income3Exemption

NEELU ANALJIT SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-9, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed with above directions

ITA 2172/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishimrs. Neelu Analjit Singh, Vs. The Addl. Commissioner Of 15, Dr. Apj Abdul Kalam Road, Income Tax , New Delhi Special Range-9, Pan: Aatps06882D New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Senior
Section 2Section 45

capital asset if it is held for not more than thirty-six months. However, in the case of share of an unlisted company or a unit of a Mutual Fund specified under clause (23D) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, which is transferred during the period beginning on 1st April, 2014 and ending on 10th July

ANALJIT SINGH,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 16(2), DELHI

3
Revision u/s 2633
Section 143(3)2

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4737/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2017AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P.Kant

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 50D

section 50D of the Act. 3. That the CIT(A) erred on facts and in law in upholding the action of the assessing officer in denying capitalization of interest expenditure aggregating to Rs. 39,95,01,050, as part of the cost of acquisition/cost of improvement while calculating capital gains

SH. PRAVEEN KUMAR MALHOTRA,DELHI vs. PR. CIT- 16, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2270/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiasstt. Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Krishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meeta Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 263Section 54F

section or the Act provides that such full value of consideration receipt can be substituted except for deeming provision provided u/s 50C, 50CA and 50D. As held above, 50CA is not applicable the assessment year 2012-13 and therefore, we hold that Ld. PCIT could not under the law have tinkered with the amount of full value of consideration received

SMT. NEELAM MALHOTRA,DELHI vs. PR. CIT- 16, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2271/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiasstt. Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Krishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meeta Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 263Section 54F

section or the Act provides that such full value of consideration receipt can be substituted except for deeming provision provided u/s 50C, 50CA and 50D. As held above, 50CA is not applicable the assessment year 2012-13 and therefore, we hold that Ld. PCIT could not under the law have tinkered with the amount of full value of consideration received

AJAY GULIYA

ITA/423/2012HC Delhi16 Jul 2012
Section 45Section 45(1)

50D and contended that having regard to the complexities of modern day transactions in capital assets, the rules have to be restated. In the extract reproduced above it has been clarified by the Supreme Court that Section 45 charges the profits or gains

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-16 vs. SH. PRAVEEN KUMAR MALHOTRA

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA/568/2019HC Delhi11 Mar 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Section 263Section 50CSection 54F

section or the Act provides that such full value of consideration receipt can be substituted except for deeming provision provided u/s 50C, 50CA and 50D. As held above, 50CA is not applicable the assessment year 2012-13 and therefore, we hold that Ld. PCIT could not under the law have tinkered with the amount of full value of consideration received

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CIRCLE-49(1), DELHI vs. BHARAT KALIA, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the appellant is allowed

ITA 295/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Apr 2026AY 2022-23
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 50C

Capital Gain (LTCG) by the AO (Assessment Unit). M/s Lifelong Online Retail Pvt. Ltd. got two valuation reports prepared from a registered valuer and Chartered Accountant for arriving at Fair Market Value (FMV) of its equity shares. Valuation report dated 24.12.2021 was based on Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method and it arrived at FMV of the equity shares