BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “capital gains”+ Section 44Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai24Cuttack14Delhi12Lucknow5Bangalore4Indore3Patna2Chandigarh1Jaipur1Raipur1SC1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 11(1)7Section 447Disallowance7Deduction6Section 14A5Exemption5Depreciation5Addition to Income5Section 294Section 11

ACIT (LTU), NEW DELHI vs. MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1768/DEL/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2017AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year : 2002-03

For Appellant: Shri M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Amrendra Kumar, CIT, DR

44A, it saved the prescription of this section alone and made futile all provisions of the Act; and while drafting section 44, it rendered useless only the provisions relating to the computation of income chargeable under the head "Interest on securities", "Income from house property", "Capital gains

ADIT (E), NEW DELHI vs. FORTUNE SOCIETY FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PROMOTION OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS, NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 2

ITA 2698/DEL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi
4
Charitable Trust4
Section 143(3)3
18 Sept 2017
AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri I.C.Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishiadit(E), Vs. Fortune Society For Tc-Ii, New Delhi Development & Promotion Of International Business, G-4, Community Centre, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi Pan:Aaatf0849L (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anshu Prakash, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Satish Khosla, Adv
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12Section 143Section 2

Section 11(1)." Thereafter, reference was made to the following quotation from the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Society of the Sisters of St. Anne (supra) : "It is clear from the above provisions that the income derived from property held under trust cannot be the total income because s. 11(1) says that the former shall

VENUS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed

ITA 5335/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Sept 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri Inturi Rama Rao Assessment Year: 2009-10 Venus Financial Services Ltd., Vs. Assistant Cit, (Now Merged With Avantha Realty Ltd.) Circle 17(1), Thapar House, 124 Janpath, New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aaacv3258L) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri P.C. Yadav, Adv. Respondent By: Shri J.P. Chandrekar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 01 .07.2015 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 :09.2015 Order Per I.C. Sudhir:The Assessee Has Impugned First Appellate Order On The Following Grounds: 1) That The Order Of The Learned Cit(Appeals) Is Bad In Law & On Facts.

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Yadav, AdvFor Respondent: Shri J.P. Chandrekar, Sr. DR

capital gain or loss is to be computed in the manner laid down in section 48 of the Act as in the section the expression used is “full value of consideration received or accrued”, meaning thereby that there is no scope of any fair market value or estimation. The Learned AR submitted that there is no material on record

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. M/S INDRAPRASTHA CANCER SOCIETY

ITA/240/2014HC Delhi18 Nov 2014
Section 32Section 35(2)(iv)

Section 11(1).” 2014:DHC:6159-DB ITA No. 240/2014+ connected appeals Page 8 of 20 Thereafter, reference was made to the following quotation from the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Society of the Sisters of St. Anne (supra) :- “It is clear from the above provisions that the income derived from property held under trust cannot

JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, HISAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 893/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Saini & Sh. N. S. Sainiita No. 893/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaji Cama Income Tax, Hisar Circle, Place, New Delhi-110066 Hisar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacj7079D Assessee By : Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv., Sh. Sumit Lal Chandani, Adv., Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. & Ms. Pallavi Saigal, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Sanjay I. Bara, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing :05.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.04.2019 Order Per N. S. Saini: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Assessing Officer U/S 143(3)/144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 29.10.2018 For Assessment Years 2013-14

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjay I. Bara, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80Section 80I

gains derived from eligible business for the purposes of section 80IA of the Income-tax Act 1961. 6 Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. 9. He further observed that as regards reliance placed by assessee on Ld. ITAT Delhi’s order for AY 2001-02 in his case & the order of High Court on the issue, it is mentioned with utmost respect

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX LAXMI NAGAR DELHI vs. TCI FOUNDATION 10 RAM BAGH AZAD MARKET ROHTAK ROAD NEW DELHI

ITA/449/2013HC Delhi27 Nov 2013

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

Section 11(1)Section 29Section 32

Section v.. V 11(1). 6. Initially we were inclined to accept the submission raised by the Revenue that there are several good reasons why we have declined to interfere and refer the matter to a larger bench to consider judgment of this Court in DIT vs. Vishwa Jagriti Mission, ITA No.140/2012 (Del.). 7. The controversy in question

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH

ITA/331/2013HC Delhi27 Nov 2013

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

Section 11(1)Section 29Section 32

Section v.. V 11(1). 6. Initially we were inclined to accept the submission raised by the Revenue that there are several good reasons why we have declined to interfere and refer the matter to a larger bench to consider judgment of this Court in DIT vs. Vishwa Jagriti Mission, ITA No.140/2012 (Del.). 7. The controversy in question

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. INDIAN TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION

ITA/7/2013HC Delhi27 Nov 2013
Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)

Section 11(1). . 6. Initially we were inclined to accept the submission raised by the Revenue that there are several good reasons why we have declined to interfere and refer the matter to a larger bench to consider judgment of this Court in DIT vs. Vishwa Jagriti Mission, ITA No.140/2012 (Del.). . 7. The controversy in question

GIESECKE & DEVRIENT (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 04, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 7075/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Suchitra Kamble[A.Y 2013-14] Giesecke & Devrient [India] Pvt Ltd Vs. The Addl. C.I.T Corporate Office, Plot No. 57, Special Range -04 Sector 44, Gurgaon New Delhi Pan: Aabcg 4223 D [Appellant] [Respondent]

For Appellant: Shri Harpreet Singh Ajmani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Surendra Pal, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40a

gains; and b) dividend. Xxxxxx 47. Tax has been defined in section 2(43) as under: " Tax" in relation to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1965 , and any subsequent assessment year means income- tax chargeable under the provisions of this Act, and in relation to any other assessment year income- tax and super- tax chargeable

DCIT (LTU), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4818/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Oct 2019AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Sh. Tarandip Singh, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 14ASection 44

44A of the Act. 22. We have considered the rival contentions and gone through the records. The provisions of s. 44 read as under: "44. Insurance business.—Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the provisions of this Act relating to the computation of income chargeable under the head ‘Interest on securities’, ‘Income from house property’, ‘Capital gains’ or ‘Income

DCIT (LTU), NEW DELHI vs. M/S THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 3839/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Tarandeep Singh, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Paramita M. Biswas, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 44

44A of the Act. 22. We have considered the rival contentions and gone through the records. The provisions of s. 44 read as under : "44. Insurance business.—Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the provisions of this Act relating to the computation of income chargeable under the head ‘Interest on securities’, ‘Income from house property’, ‘Capital gains’ or ‘Income

DCIT (LTU), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 485/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Tarandeep Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Katoch, Senior DR
Section 143Section 14ASection 44

section 30(a)(ii) of the Act. So, we find no ground to 8 ITA No.485/Del./2016 interfere with the findings returned by the ld. CIT (A) and consequently ground no.2 is determined against the Revenue. GROUND NO.3 12. The ld. CIT (A) deleted the addition of Rs.49,84,92,820/- made by the AO by invoking the provisions contained