BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai16Bangalore7Delhi3Hyderabad2Ahmedabad1Surat1Jaipur1Jodhpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 44B5Section 1973Section 692Section 143(3)2Addition to Income2

PRADEEP WIG,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-5, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 406/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharma

43C or section 57 to section 59 or section 92C of the said Act shall not be included in the total undisclosed foreign income. (3) The income included in the total undisclosed foreign income and asset under this Act shall not form part of the total income under the Income-tax Act. 32. Thus, the income from the overseas sources

KREUZ CHALLENGER PTE LTD,SINGAPURE vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE2(1)(2), NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2373/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year: 2019-20 Kreuz Challenger Pte Ltd., Vs Acit, 2, Venture Drive, International Taxation #24-01 Vision Exchange, Circle 2(1)(2), Singapore , 999999 New Delhi. Pan : Aahck3082A

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, Advocate
For Respondent: Ms C. Chandra Kanta, CIT-DR
Section 115ASection 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 197Section 44BSection 44DSection 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90(2)

capital asset situated in India (referred as business income). Explanation 1(a) to Section 9(1)(i) of the Act provides an exclusion in the case of operations which are not carried out in India. The explanation provides that the income of the business deemed under this clause to accrue or arise in India shall be only that part

BRIJESH KUMAR,MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. ITO, WARD- 1(2), MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 3656/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 69

capital account and statement of affairs for three years. 8. The Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Surat Bench in the case of Mansukh K. Vaghasia vs. ITO reported in [2022] 139 taxmann.com 84 (Surat-Trib.). In similar set of facts, deleted the addition in the following manner: “13. We have heard both the parties and carefully gone through