BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur5Ahmedabad5Mumbai4Delhi3Bangalore3Indore2Chandigarh2Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 271A7Section 44A7Section 143(3)3Section 271(1)(c)3Penalty3Section 2712Addition to Income2

SAHIL GUPTA,DELHI vs. CIT(A), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1708/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No.1708/Del/2025, (A.Y.2022-23) Sahil Gupta, Dy. Commissioner Of Income D-304, Vivek Vihar, Tax, Central Circle 58(1), New Delhi- 110095 Vs. Ara Building, Jhandewalan, Pan: Aoipg4087K New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By None Respondent By Sh. Manish Gupta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29/08/2025 Order Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am This Appeal Of The Assessee For The Assessment Year (‘Ay’) 2022-23 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 02.12.2024 Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nfac, New Delhi (‘Cit(A)’).

Section 143(3)Section 271ASection 44A

271A of the Act, by considering F & O turnover Rs.55,64,95,179/- as against Actual F & O turnover of Rs.29,28,652/- and Speculation turnover Rs.2,87,421/-. As per Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act specifies the conditions for a tax audit Section 44AB(a): If the total turnover from F&O trading exceeds Rs 10 crore

SHYAM SUNDER KANSAL,U.P vs. WARD 2(3)(2), U.P

The appeal is dismissed

ITA 139/DEL/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 50C

section 50C when 2 Shyam Sunder Kansal Vs. ITO after valuation by DVO Hon’ble CIT (Appeals) deleted major part of addition of AO and this addition is not an specific addition one. 3. Hon’ble CIT (Appeals) is wrong in confirming the penalty on additions of FDR interest which the assessee sue moto surrendered as income before making

RAJESH SAHNI,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 60(5), NEW DELHI

In the result, this appeal is allowed as indicated above for

ITA 3295/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sudhir Pareek

For Appellant: Shri Samyak Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Om Parkash, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 271ASection 271BSection 44A

gains as well as under the head Income from business and profession (speculative income). 4. That the Ld. Assessing Officer is not justified in treating the amount of Short Term Capital Loss and speculative loss of share transactions as per broker statement, as the business income of the assessee and levying tax thereon and creating the demand. The conclusion