BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi8Cochin8Mumbai4Jaipur4Indore2Visakhapatnam2Lucknow1Hyderabad1Ahmedabad1Patna1Pune1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 268A6Section 69C5Section 143(3)5Penny Stock5Addition to Income5Section 1484Section 684Capital Gains4Section 1443

ACIT, CIRCLE- 30(1), NEW DELHI vs. UMESH KUMAR ARORA, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4043/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year: 2014-15 Vs. Acit, M/S. Umesh Kumar Arora, Circle-30(1), C-15, Greater Kailash Enclave-1, New Delhi Delhi-1100 48 Pan Aaapa4832A Pan :Aaapa4832A (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69C

capital gain. Since you have claimed an LTCG of Rs.53,83,045/-, an amount of Rs.1,61,491/- i.e. 3% of Rs.53,83,045/- is being added u/s. 69C as unexplained expenditure. Further, purchase value of Rs.1,50,000/- is added back to your income as unexplained expenditure u/s. 69C. From the above portion of the impugned order

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-19, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. SATYA PRAKASH GUPTA, DELHI

In the result, Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3925/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwali.T.A. No. 3925/Del/2023 (A.Y 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income V Satya Prakash Gupta Tax, S H-3/1, Model Town, Central Circle-19, New Delhi Part-Iii, New Delhi Pan: Aahpg0717H Appellant Respondent Assessee By Adv.Sumit Lalchandani Revenue By Sh. Mahesh Kumar, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing 11/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24/09/2025 Order Per Yogesh Kumar, U.S. Jm: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi (‘Ld. Cit(A)’

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 268A

268A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - FILING OF APPEALS OR APPLICATION FOR REFERENCE BY INCOME-TAX AUTHORITY - SPECIAL ORDER OF BOARD EXEMPTING CASES INVOLVING BOGUS LONG TERM CAPITAL GAINS (LTCG)/SHORT TERM CAPITAL LOSS (STCL) THROUGH PENNY STOCKS FROM MONETARY LIMITS SPECIFIED IN ANY CIRCULAR ISSUED UNDER SECTION

ITO WARD - 3(4), NOIDA vs. SHOBHA AGNIHOTRI, NOIDA

In the result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1193/DEL/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Memebr D-4, Sec-27, Noida – 201 301 Noida-201 301 Pan No. Aewpa 0847 H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By -None- Revenue By Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 02.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.03.2023 Order Per Anil Chaturvedi, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 28.12.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Noida Relating To Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The Relevant Facts As Culled From The Material On Records Are As Under:

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 68

capital gain on sale of immovable property after considering additional evidences filed before him during the course of appellate proceedings and without confronting these additional evidences to the Assessing Officer, which is violative not only of Rule 46A of the I.T. Rules but also of the principles of natural justice. 3. Without prejudice to ground no -1 above

ITO WARD - 3(1), NOIDA vs. RAMESH KUMAR, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed ex-parte

ITA 1211/DEL/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Anuj Garg, Sr.D.R
Section 144Section 268A(1)

Section 268A. (1) The Board may, from time to time, issue orders, instructions or directions to other income-tax authorities, fixing such monetary limits as it may deem fit, for the purpose of regulating filing of appeal or application for reference by any income-tax authority under the provisions of this Chapter" 10. The Revenue craves leave to modify

ACIT, CIRCLE- 7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DECENT FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 594/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: The Ld. Cit (A) Challenging Both

For Appellant: Shri Amit Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Yogesh Kumar Nayyar, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 268ASection 69C

gainfully refer to the Head Note of the aforesaid decision as under :- “Section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Filing of appeal or application for reference by income-tax authority (Circular No. 23 of 2019) - Assessment year 2011-12 - Whether Circular No. 23 of 2019 dated 6-9-2019 read with Office Memorandum dated 16-9-2019, shall apply

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-13, NEW DELHI vs. DEEPAK AGARWAL, DELHI

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 8796/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri T. James Singson. CIT- DR
Section 268A

capital gains through penny stocks but pertains to commission income of the assessee and the concerned Assessing Officer in his reply has taken a categorical note of the same. The Ld. CIT-DR had nothing to say in this regard. 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Perusal of the aforesaid appeals filed

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-13, NEW DELHI vs. DEEPAK AGARWAL, DELHI

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 8795/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri T. James Singson. CIT- DR
Section 268A

capital gains through penny stocks but pertains to commission income of the assessee and the concerned Assessing Officer in his reply has taken a categorical note of the same. The Ld. CIT-DR had nothing to say in this regard. 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Perusal of the aforesaid appeals filed

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-13, NEW DELHI vs. DEEPAK AGARWAL, DELHI

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 8794/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri T. James Singson. CIT- DR
Section 268A

capital gains through penny stocks but pertains to commission income of the assessee and the concerned Assessing Officer in his reply has taken a categorical note of the same. The Ld. CIT-DR had nothing to say in this regard. 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Perusal of the aforesaid appeals filed