BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 25lclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad10Delhi3Mumbai1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Section 14A4Section 251(2)4Section 36(1)(iii)3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 2632Section 94(7)2Section 362Deduction2Depreciation2

M/S. LUCINA LAND DEVELOPMENT LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, grounds no

ITA 962/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Lucina Land Vs. Acit, Development Ltd., Circle-15(2), M-62 & 63, 1St Floor, New Delhi Connaught Place, New Delhi Pan :Aabcl2130N (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 36Section 36(1)(iii)

gains from their sale and dividends from such holding, accordingly, the interest expenditure incurred by the appellant for purposes of acquiring these shares cannot be allowed u/s 36(l)(iii). For the reasons discussed in para 3.6 to 3.10 hereinabove, it is held that the addition made by the Assessing Officer by disallowing pro-rata interest in respect of interest

FRICK INDIA LTD vs. DCIT CIRCLE-11 (1),

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our

ITA 2072/DEL/2008[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Dec 2021AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Tarandeep Singh, Advocate and Shri Pulkit Verma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar Varma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 251(2)Section 263Section 94(7)

gains. Backed by the aforesaid facts, the CIT(A) called upon the assessee to explain as to why the short term capital loss of (Rs. 1,38,131/-) should not be disallowed in view of the provisions of section 94(7) of the Act. Accordingly, the CIT(A) after validily putting the assessee to show cause

FRICK INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our

ITA 330/DEL/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Dec 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Tarandeep Singh, Advocate and Shri Pulkit Verma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar Varma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 251(2)Section 263Section 94(7)

gains. Backed by the aforesaid facts, the CIT(A) called upon the assessee to explain as to why the short term capital loss of (Rs. 1,38,131/-) should not be disallowed in view of the provisions of section 94(7) of the Act. Accordingly, the CIT(A) after validily putting the assessee to show cause