BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

188 results for “capital gains”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai273Delhi188Chennai106Jaipur87Bangalore75Ahmedabad72Hyderabad45Raipur38Panaji30Indore28Kolkata25Chandigarh24Guwahati17Cochin13Pune10Lucknow8Surat8Cuttack6Ranchi5Amritsar5Patna5Rajkot4Allahabad2Visakhapatnam1Jodhpur1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Addition to Income70Section 69A52Section 143(3)48Section 14744Section 69C44Section 26338Section 153C35Disallowance28Deduction27Section 153A

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. KCT PAPERS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, grounds raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 3380/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Dec 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaacit, Circle 5 (1) Vs. M/S. Kct Papers Limited, New Delhi. Thapar House, 124, Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001. (Pan : Aacck4937D) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rohit Jain, Advocate Shri Deepesh Jain, Advocate Shri Tavish Verma, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Kailash Dan Ratnoo, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 10.09.2025 Date Of Order : 05.12.2025 O R D E R Per S.Rifaur Rahman: 1. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-Viii, New Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Ld. Cit (A)] Dated 21.03.2014For Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are, The Assessee Company Belongs To The Thapar Group Established By Late Lala Karam Chand Thapar. There Was A Family Settlement Between The Various Constituents Of The Karam Chand Thapar Family As A Result Of Which Revenue-Organization/Restructuring Of The Group Dated 27Th April, 2001. The Re April, 2001. The Re-Organization Of The Group Companies & Trusts Organization Of The Group Companies & Trusts Was Made Into Four Groups, As Under, Each Headed By The Sons Of Late Lala Was Made Into Four Groups, As Under, Each Headed By The Sons Of Late Lala Was Made Into Four Groups, As Under, Each Headed By The Sons Of Late Lala K.C. Thapar. The Family Tree Of Karam Chand T K.C. Thapar. The Family Tree Of Karam Chand Thapar Family Is Explained As Hapar Family Is Explained As Under In The Form Of A Diagrammatic Chart: Under In The Form Of A Diagrammatic Chart:

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Dan Ratnoo, CIT DR
Section 391

Showing 1–20 of 188 · Page 1 of 10

...
26
Section 14A24
Natural Justice18

section 55(2)(1), cost inflation index was to be applied with effect from 1-4-1981 instead of the year of acquisition by the assessee. 46. The Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of DCIT v. Sushil Kumar: 231 Taxman 788 held that where capital asset was property of HUF prior to 1.4.1981 and assessee acquired absolute ownership

NIKESH ARORA,GURGAON vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, GURGON

In the result, appeal is allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 1008/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: We Proceed To Deal With The Substantive Issues Arising

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 2

2(42A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and gain accrued is short term capital gain. In this regard, it is to state that while passing the assessment order, the AO disallowed the claim of the assessee and held gain on transactions of shares as short term capital gain which is stated above in brief facts of the case

ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-7, NEW DELHI vs. PURAN ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 5656/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri M.P. Rastogi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.M. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14A

section 14A are mandatory provisions.” 3. When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsel for the assessee in the Revenue’s Appeal submitted at the outset that identical issue came up in Assessee’s own case for Assessment Years 2010-11, 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 wherein the benefit of Long Term Gains arising

SMT. RITU SINGH,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6504/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Hiren Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Princy Singla, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 54Section 68

gain made by the assessee. The claim has not been entertained by the Ld. CIT(A) for want of evidence of payment. The Ld. AR has also not addressed us in this regard. As it is, now the claim has become only academic in nature. Accordingly, we decide all the additional grounds taken by the assessee before the Tribunal

SANJEEV AGRAWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CC-15, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee areallowed

ITA 1518/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice-& Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain & Ms. Monika Aggarwal, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Ramdhan Meena, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)

section 112A, inserted by Finance Act, 2018, w.e.f. 01.04.2019. 6.6. He further elucidated that assessee is a habitual investor having portfolio of investment in shares and has earned capital gain both in preceding and succeeding years. Ld. Counsel referred to the details of investment and capital gain in preceding and succeeding years which is extracted below

SANJEEV AGRAWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CC-15, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee areallowed

ITA 1519/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice-& Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain & Ms. Monika Aggarwal, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Ramdhan Meena, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)

section 112A, inserted by Finance Act, 2018, w.e.f. 01.04.2019. 6.6. He further elucidated that assessee is a habitual investor having portfolio of investment in shares and has earned capital gain both in preceding and succeeding years. Ld. Counsel referred to the details of investment and capital gain in preceding and succeeding years which is extracted below

RAMESH CHAND,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals of the respective assessees are

ITA 2099/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Suneeta Verma, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 1ASection 234A

Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 20.05.2021 passed by ACIT, Central Circle-30, Delhi for the common assessment year 2019-20. 2. Common issue is involved in all the five appeals on account of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of property which was a joint property of the five

ANIL KUMAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals of the respective assessees are

ITA 2097/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Suneeta Verma, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 1ASection 234A

Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 20.05.2021 passed by ACIT, Central Circle-30, Delhi for the common assessment year 2019-20. 2. Common issue is involved in all the five appeals on account of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of property which was a joint property of the five

RAJEEV KUMAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals of the respective assessees are

ITA 2100/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Suneeta Verma, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 1ASection 234A

Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 20.05.2021 passed by ACIT, Central Circle-30, Delhi for the common assessment year 2019-20. 2. Common issue is involved in all the five appeals on account of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of property which was a joint property of the five

SUMIT DANG,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 30, DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals of the respective assessees are

ITA 2098/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Suneeta Verma, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 1ASection 234A

Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 20.05.2021 passed by ACIT, Central Circle-30, Delhi for the common assessment year 2019-20. 2. Common issue is involved in all the five appeals on account of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of property which was a joint property of the five

DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI vs. DLF LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 713/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

2) of section 145 (emphasis supplied) 19. The legislative intent behind insertion of section 43CB in the statute can be gauged from reading of the “Memorandum explaining the provisions of Finance Bill, 2018”, which provides as under: “Amendments in relation to notified Income Computation and Disclosure Standards. At present, section 145 of the Act empowers the Central government to notify

DLF LIMITED,DELHI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 677/DEL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

2) of section 145 (emphasis supplied) 19. The legislative intent behind insertion of section 43CB in the statute can be gauged from reading of the “Memorandum explaining the provisions of Finance Bill, 2018”, which provides as under: “Amendments in relation to notified Income Computation and Disclosure Standards. At present, section 145 of the Act empowers the Central government to notify

DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI vs. DLF LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 714/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

2) of section 145 (emphasis supplied) 19. The legislative intent behind insertion of section 43CB in the statute can be gauged from reading of the “Memorandum explaining the provisions of Finance Bill, 2018”, which provides as under: “Amendments in relation to notified Income Computation and Disclosure Standards. At present, section 145 of the Act empowers the Central government to notify

DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI vs. DLF LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 715/DEL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

2) of section 145 (emphasis supplied) 19. The legislative intent behind insertion of section 43CB in the statute can be gauged from reading of the “Memorandum explaining the provisions of Finance Bill, 2018”, which provides as under: “Amendments in relation to notified Income Computation and Disclosure Standards. At present, section 145 of the Act empowers the Central government to notify

DLF LIMITED,DELHI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 676/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

2) of section 145 (emphasis supplied) 19. The legislative intent behind insertion of section 43CB in the statute can be gauged from reading of the “Memorandum explaining the provisions of Finance Bill, 2018”, which provides as under: “Amendments in relation to notified Income Computation and Disclosure Standards. At present, section 145 of the Act empowers the Central government to notify

GENPACT CONSULTING (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS 'HEADSTRONG CONSULTING PTE. LTD.'),GURGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1) INT. TAX., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 501/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwalla, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 2(47)Section 263Section 45Section 47

capital gains tax liability and why the income is exempt. 7. The first notice issued by the Assessing Officer during the course of scrutiny assessment proceedings is dated 16.08.2017 wherein the Assessing Officer had asked the assessee to submit copies of acknowledgement of filing return of income alongwith Income tax return form and notes to return and also Form

DCIT,C-11(1), NEW DELHI vs. HERO MOTOCORP LTD.,, NEW DELHI

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1982/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya & Shri Kul Bharat

Section 14ASection 2(22)(e)Section 40Section 40a

capital gains and not income from business/profession. While deciding the appeal for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14, the Hon’ble Tribunal decided the issue in favor of the assessee following the orders for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. Further, in the order passed for assessment years

THR INFRASTRUCTURE PTE LTD,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CIR.-3(1)(1), INTL TAX, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1915/DEL/2022[201-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 May 2023

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

section 112 of the Act denying the benefit of the Tax Treaty but accepting the valuation adopted by the Assessee. 11. The grievance of the Assessee raised by grounds of appeal Nos. 2 to 6 is thus limited to the denial of the exemption under Article 13(4) of the Tax Treaty qua capital gains earned on sale of CCDs

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-15, DELHI vs. SANJEEV AGRAWAL HUF, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 2035/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Manish Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 147Section 69C

220 701.52 1,392.01 12,12,851.50 91 - 95 4 2.3.2017 99,968 35.84 35,82,853.12 3,594 2,060.62 4,118.29 35,73,080.21 96 -100 5 3.3.2017 79,070 36.24 28.65,496.80 2,874 1,634.44 3,296.19 28,57,692.17 101-103 Total

BLP VAYU (PROJECT-1) P.LTD,GURGAON vs. PR.CIT , GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4895/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kanv Bali, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

220/- being accounted for its books of account. The ld. counsel next submitted that while the share application money was received in preceding Assessment Year 2013-14 which was also subjected to scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, the compliance of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act was also verified in the Assessment Year