YAMUNA KHADAR SHIKSHA SAMITI,DELHI vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, all the Eleven appeals filed by the Assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Before Shri A.N. Misshra

capital gains would be chargeable in some cases where the cost of acquisition was Niland hence, it is the statute which empowers the authorities to levy fees, charges or taxes. In the absence of such power, there is no merit in levy of fees under section 234E of the Act. 15. We have heard the rival contentions and perused

YAMUNA KHADAR SHIKSHA SAMITI,DELHI vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, all the Eleven appeals filed by the Assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Before Shri A.N. Misshra

capital gains would be chargeable in some cases where the cost of acquisition was Niland hence, it is the statute which empowers the authorities to levy fees, charges or taxes. In the absence of such power, there is no merit in levy of fees under section 234E of the Act. 15. We have heard the rival contentions and perused

YAMUNA KHADAR SHIKSHA SAMITI,DELHI vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, all the Eleven appeals filed by the Assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Before Shri A.N. Misshra

capital gains would be chargeable in some cases where the cost of acquisition was Niland hence, it is the statute which empowers the authorities to levy fees, charges or taxes. In the absence of such power, there is no merit in levy of fees under section 234E of the Act. 15. We have heard the rival contentions and perused

JAGDISH CHANDRA MALHOTRA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri L.P. Sahuasstt.Year: 2008-09

capital gain tax has been I.T.A. No. 5651/D/2013 Assessment year 2008-09 calculated at the rate of 30% whereas it should be at 20% as per section 112 of the Act 7. We have perused the materials available on record and considered the submissions made by both the parties. It is clear from the above cited judgements that the assessee

INCOME TAX OFFICER(E) WARD- 2(4), NEW DELHI, CIVIC CENTRE NEW DELHI vs. PRAKASH SEWA TRUST, PASCHIM VIHAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

capital gain shall be deemed to\nhave been applied to charitable or religious purposes because of\ninsertion of Section 11(1A) of the Act which has been specifically\ninserted to allow this exemption by Finance No. 2 Act 1971 with\nretrospective effect from 1.4.1962\"\nThis fully applies to facts of present case.\nAbove stated legal position more strongly applies

KREUZ CHALLENGER PTE LTD,SINGAPURE vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE2(1)(2), NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year: 2019-20 Kreuz Challenger Pte Ltd., Vs Acit, 2, Venture Drive, International Taxation #24-01 Vision Exchange, Circle 2(1)(2), Singapore , 999999 New Delhi. Pan : Aahck3082A

capital asset situated in India (referred as business income). Explanation 1(a) to Section 9(1)(i) of the Act provides an exclusion in the case of operations which are not carried out in India. The explanation provides that the income of the business deemed under this clause to accrue or arise in India shall be only that part

NEERU DUGGAL,FARIDABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4 , NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RAJNISH TALWAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

DUGGAL & SONS BUILDWELL (P) LTD.,FARIDABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RAJNISH TALWAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RAJNISH TALWAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RAJNISH TALWAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RATNA TALWAR,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RAJNISH TALWAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RATNASHRI BUILDTECH PVT LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CICRLE 4, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RAJNISH TALWAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RATNASHRI BUILDTECH PVT LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CICRLE 4, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search

RATNASHRI BUILDTECH PVT LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CICRLE 4, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 where, liquor seller is supposed to collect 1% of the total trade value as TCS from the buyer and deposit the same into the Government Account. Considering, the payment made to M/s Alfa India by M/s Sohan Lai Singla & M/s Om Prakash Singla, as bogus purchase of liquor by them, a search