BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6,175 results for “capital gains”+ Section 2(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,299Delhi6,175Bangalore2,532Chennai2,503Kolkata1,947Ahmedabad1,852Jaipur1,248Hyderabad1,141Pune1,134Surat742Chandigarh644Indore568Karnataka509Cochin400Visakhapatnam391Raipur295Nagpur253Rajkot240Cuttack181Amritsar180Agra172Lucknow169Panaji123Calcutta115Guwahati111Telangana105SC105Patna94Ranchi91Dehradun89Jodhpur77Jabalpur75Allahabad36Varanasi25Kerala21Rajasthan11Orissa9Punjab & Haryana9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income69Section 143(3)59Section 14738Section 14A33Section 14830Disallowance28Section 2827Deduction24Section 115J22Capital Gains

MR. NIKHIL SAWHNEY,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NOIDA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1249/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumarmr. Nikhil Sawhney, Vs. Dcit, 17, Sunder Nagar, Central Circle, New Delhi-11003 Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaups0222Q

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Harpreet Kaur hansra, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)

1, 2004, on which securities transaction tax is chargeable in law, either under section 70 or under any other section. That is, the exemption provided by section 10(38) is absolute. Accordingly, long-term capital Mr. Nikhil Sawhney loss could be set off against the long-term capital gain, irrespective of whether security transaction tax in its respect has paid

KUSUM DUBE,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 2(3), GURGAON

Showing 1–20 of 6,175 · Page 1 of 309

...
22
Section 6820
Long Term Capital Gains20

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 7444/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh(), Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishrakusum Dube Vs. Ito Ward 2(3) C/O Kapil Goel Adv. Gurgaon, Income Tax F-26/124 Sector 7, Rohini Department, Phase V, Delhi - 110085 Udyog Vihar, Sector 19, Gurugram, Haryana 122016 Haryana "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aewpd9787R Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Dr. Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Om Prakash, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 54F

2) was issued by the ITO, Dibrugarh. Subsequently, the case was transferred on request made by the assessee to the jurisdictional AO of Gurgaon and the file was received on transfer by office letter issued by ITO, Ward 1(4) Dibrugarh dated 29.03.2017. Notice under Section 142(1) was issued on 05.06.2017 requiring the assessee to file information relating

ACIT CIRCLE-1(2), NEW DELHI vs. ASSOCIATED TECHNO PLASTICS PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 7444/DEL/1992[1989-90]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Mar 2025AY 1989-90

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh(), Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishrakusum Dube Vs. Ito Ward 2(3) C/O Kapil Goel Adv. Gurgaon, Income Tax F-26/124 Sector 7, Rohini Department, Phase V, Delhi - 110085 Udyog Vihar, Sector 19, Gurugram, Haryana 122016 Haryana "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aewpd9787R Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Dr. Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Om Prakash, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 54F

2) was issued by the ITO, Dibrugarh. Subsequently, the case was transferred on request made by the assessee to the jurisdictional AO of Gurgaon and the file was received on transfer by office letter issued by ITO, Ward 1(4) Dibrugarh dated 29.03.2017. Notice under Section 142(1) was issued on 05.06.2017 requiring the assessee to file information relating

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JHANDEWALLAN EXTN., DELHI vs. BDR BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed for the Asst Year

ITA 2451/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Agarwal, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Sunita Verma, CIT DR
Section 133ASection 147Section 68Section 69A

SECTION ASSESSMENT ORDER 143(31 U/S 143(3) AT PAGE NO. 929 TO 935 ITA Nos. 2451/ & 2452Del/2023 BDR Builders and Developers Pvt Ltd 4 03.12.2015 03.12.2015 1,29,00,000.00 1,29,00,000.00 REFUND OFADVANCE FOR PROPERTIES GIVEN DURING THE EARLIER YEARS TO M/S NISHIT CONFIRMATION OF INFRATECH PVT LTD ACCOUNT, BALANCE SHEET OF M/S NISHIT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT vs. BDR BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed for the Asst Year

ITA 2452/DEL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Agarwal, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Sunita Verma, CIT DR
Section 133ASection 147Section 68Section 69A

SECTION ASSESSMENT ORDER 143(31 U/S 143(3) AT PAGE NO. 929 TO 935 ITA Nos. 2451/ & 2452Del/2023 BDR Builders and Developers Pvt Ltd 4 03.12.2015 03.12.2015 1,29,00,000.00 1,29,00,000.00 REFUND OFADVANCE FOR PROPERTIES GIVEN DURING THE EARLIER YEARS TO M/S NISHIT CONFIRMATION OF INFRATECH PVT LTD ACCOUNT, BALANCE SHEET OF M/S NISHIT

MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), MEERUT

In the result, the additional Ground No

ITA 2313/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 153(3)Section 270ASection 35Section 80GSection 80I

gains of such eligible business for the purposes of the deduction under this section, take the amount of profits as may be reasonably deemed to have been derived therefrom: Provided that in case the aforesaid arrangement involves a specified domestic transaction referred to in section 92BA, the amount of profits from such transaction shall be determined having regard

ACIT,, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SCORPIO RESEARCH & CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3583/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT,, NEW DELHI vs. M/S VATIKA LIMITED,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3592/DEL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SEH REALTORS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 791/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. U.K. PAINTS INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2690/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. U.K. PAINTS INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2692/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SPAN INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 310/DEL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

VATIKA LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3712/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT,, NEW DELHI vs. M/S VATIKA LIMITED,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3597/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

VATIKA LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3710/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SEH REALTORS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 789/DEL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

VATIKA LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3708/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

VATIKA LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3709/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SEH REALTORS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 788/DEL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020

ACIT,, NEW DELHI vs. M/S VATIKA LIMITED,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the COs of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3596/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. M. P. Rastogi, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR

capital gains on the sale of property does not arise. From the above discussion, it is clear that the transaction was actually a financing/loan arrangement which was camouflaged as sale/purchase transaction to pay tax at lower rates. CONCLUSION: From the documentary and oral evidence discussed above it is clearly established and corroborated that: CO No. 64/Del/2020