PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 vs. MANUPATRA INFORMATION SOLUTION

The appeal is disposed of declaring the law as above and setting aside

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

Capitalism : A Very Short Introduction : (160 pages; 48 pages copied constituting 30%; publisher Cambridge University Press; Approximate Price : Paper Back `225, Hard bound Data N/A) (iii) Post-Colonialism : An Historical Introduction (512 pages; 57 pages copied constituting 11.1%; publisher Oxford University Press; Approximate Price : Paper Back `3126, Hard bound Data N/A) (iv) A Concise History of India : (372 pages

EMERGING INDIA FOCUS FUNDS,MAURITIUS vs. ACIT, CIRCLE INT. TAXATION 1(2)(2), DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

12 months. • In the instant case, units acquired post 1 April 2017 were acquired during the period 24 April 2017 to 16 October 2018. Accordingly, at the time of redemption of units during AY 2022-23, the mutual fund units were long-term in nature and gains derived from such mutual fund units shall be taxable as long-term capital

SUMITOMO CORPORATION,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble(Through Video Conferencing) Sumitomo Corporation Vs Dcit (International Taxation) G-195, Circle-3(1)(2) Sarita Vihar New Delhi New Delhi Aabcs6011P (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 144C of the Income Tax Act thereby proposing to make following variation to the return income of the assessee:- Particulars Amount (in Rs.) as Amount (in Rs.) as per revised return assessed of income A Business Income Income from -1,27,500 1,27,500 6 various projects as per return of income Add: Income from

SAKET KANOI,GURGAON vs. DCIT INTL. TAXATION, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

12 Saket Kanoi A perusal of preamble of the tax treaty and relevant background at the time of signing of the tax treaty makes it clear that the objective of the tax treaty is to provide relief from burden of double taxation. The taxes which the UAE government was contemplating to impose on individuals as per recommendations

(Now known as Sony India Limited)

capital, transportation, level of the market, i.e. retail or wholesale and so forth. The Rules and the analytical steps. 71. Sub-Sections (1) and (2) to Section 92C are applicable to the assessed, as well as the Assessing Officer invoking power under Sub-Section (3) to Section 92C of the Act. As noted above, sub-section (2) to Section

SHIV KUMAR JATIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 10(2), NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 7256/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 241/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Sh. Shiv Kumar Jatia, Vs Income Tax Officer, B-50, Gulmohar Park, Ward-10(2), New Delhi-110049 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabpj7582K Assessee By : Sh. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Prakash Dubey, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.03.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.04.2021

capital asset being equity share in a company where such transaction is chargeable to STT, since the entire receipt from such transfer is exempt under Section 10(38). Kind attention is also drawn to section 14A of the Act, which provides that “for the purpose of computing total income under Chapter IV, no deduction shall be allowed in respect

SHIV KUMAR JATIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 10(2), NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 7256/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 241/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Sh. Shiv Kumar Jatia, Vs Income Tax Officer, B-50, Gulmohar Park, Ward-10(2), New Delhi-110049 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabpj7582K Assessee By : Sh. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Prakash Dubey, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.03.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.04.2021

capital asset being equity share in a company where such transaction is chargeable to STT, since the entire receipt from such transfer is exempt under Section 10(38). Kind attention is also drawn to section 14A of the Act, which provides that “for the purpose of computing total income under Chapter IV, no deduction shall be allowed in respect

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

gains derived from immovable property is income and therefore Article VI would be attracted.‖ 21. Mr. Chawla contended that when faced with a situation where the meaning of a term is not defined under a tax treaty, Courts would have to necessarily follow the ambulatory approach, as enunciated, as opposed to a static approach. Mr. Chawla submitted that the private

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

gains derived from immovable property is income and therefore Article VI would be attracted.‖ 21. Mr. Chawla contended that when faced with a situation where the meaning of a term is not defined under a tax treaty, Courts would have to necessarily follow the ambulatory approach, as enunciated, as opposed to a static approach. Mr. Chawla submitted that the private

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

gains derived from immovable property is income and therefore Article VI would be attracted.‖ 21. Mr. Chawla contended that when faced with a situation where the meaning of a term is not defined under a tax treaty, Courts would have to necessarily follow the ambulatory approach, as enunciated, as opposed to a static approach. Mr. Chawla submitted that the private

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

gains derived from immovable property is income and therefore Article VI would be attracted.‖ 21. Mr. Chawla contended that when faced with a situation where the meaning of a term is not defined under a tax treaty, Courts would have to necessarily follow the ambulatory approach, as enunciated, as opposed to a static approach. Mr. Chawla submitted that the private

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WELCOME SEEDS LTD.

12. The scheme of section 271(1)(c) therefore is this. If a person conceals income in the sense we understand it, he becomes liable to pay penalty. The concealment triggers the liability to penalty. Once the liability arises, the only other thing to do is to quantiff the amount of penalty. The minimum and maximum penalty amounts have been

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. NEW SKIES SATELLITE BV

Accordingly answered against the Revenue. The appeals fail and are dismissed, without

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Capital gains") for— (i) the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a licence) in respect of a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property ; (ii) the imparting of any information concerning the working of, or the use of, a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade

M/S. AT & T GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri I.C.Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishiat & T Global Network Services Dcit, (India) Pvt Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vs. Vatika Lok-1, Block-A, Gurgaon New Delhi Pan:Aafca8810L (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit, At & T Global Network Services Circle-2(1), (India) Pvt Ltd., Vs. New Delhi Vatika Lok-1, Block-A, Gurgaon Pan:Aafca8810L (Appellant) (Respondent)

gainfully refer the provision of section 36(1) (iii) in this regard. The said section read as under:- ―(iii) the amount of the interest paid in respect of capital borrowed for the purposes of the business or profession: Provided that any amount of the interest paid, in respect of capital borrowed for acquisition of an asset for extension of existing

ROHTASH SINGH,GURGAON vs. DCIT, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

AC) is accordingly directed to allow further deduction u/s 54B in respect of amount utilized towards purchase of agricultural land upto the date of actual filing of return for the current assessment year. The disallowance of excess deduction claimed by the appellant on account of amount spent on purchase of agricultural land after the date of actual filing of return

UMA SINGAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRL CIRCLE-3, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Section 132 (4A) on the basis of these two statements. It is a matter of the record - duly noted by the CIT (A) as well as ITAT that the three companies or business concerns whose monies were supposed to have been reflected in the handwritten ledgers (Bondwell Insurance Brokers, E-Synergy Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. and Paradigm Advertising) were all concerns

RITU SINGAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 3, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Section 132 (4A) on the basis of these two statements. It is a matter of the record - duly noted by the CIT (A) as well as ITAT that the three companies or business concerns whose monies were supposed to have been reflected in the handwritten ledgers (Bondwell Insurance Brokers, E-Synergy Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. and Paradigm Advertising) were all concerns

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. R.J. CORP LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

gain arising from conversion of capital asset into stock in trade as per section 45(2) of the Ac 1961.” ITA No. 4971/Del/2015 : A.Y. 2011-12 (Assessee Appeal) 2. Following grounds have been raised by the assessee: “1. That on the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred