BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 112Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai34Pune9Bangalore8Delhi5Chennai3Indore3Rajkot2Surat1Ahmedabad1Dehradun1Jaipur1Kolkata1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Section 10(38)4Section 2634Addition to Income4Section 54F3Section 112A3Long Term Capital Gains3Exemption3Disallowance3Section 143(2)

EMERGING INDIA FOCUS FUNDS,MAURITIUS vs. ACIT, CIRCLE INT. TAXATION 1(2)(2), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1963/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jun 2025AY 2022-23
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

capital gains on redemption of\nmutual fund units acquired on or after 1 April 2017 i.e. INR 183,74,01,322\n(65% of INR 282,67,71,265) shall be considered long-term in nature and\ntaxable at 10% plus applicable surcharge and cess as per section 112A

MUKUL ROHATGI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2427/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

2
Section 144B2
Penny Stock2
For Respondent: Shri Sachit Jolly, Senior Advocate
Section 112ASection 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 24Section 263

capital gain' to be taxed under Section 112A of the Act or normal provisions under the head ‘short term capital

SANJEEV AGRAWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CC-15, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee areallowed

ITA 1518/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice-& Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain & Ms. Monika Aggarwal, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Ramdhan Meena, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)

section 112A, inserted by Finance Act, 2018, w.e.f. 01.04.2019. 6.6. He further elucidated that assessee is a habitual investor having portfolio of investment in shares and has earned capital gain

SANJEEV AGRAWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CC-15, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee areallowed

ITA 1519/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice-& Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain & Ms. Monika Aggarwal, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Ramdhan Meena, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)

section 112A, inserted by Finance Act, 2018, w.e.f. 01.04.2019. 6.6. He further elucidated that assessee is a habitual investor having portfolio of investment in shares and has earned capital gain

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NOIDA vs. AJAY GOEL, HARYANA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1459/DEL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Aug 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: Shri Kanchan Kaushal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 54F

capital gain arose then in that case also the Appellant\ncannot be held to be absolute owner of jointly held properties and could only be held\nabsolute owner of only one residential property. It is submitted that the concept of\nownership under section 541 of the Act of residential house talks about absolute\nownership and not co-ownership or joint