BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 92Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune6Delhi3Kolkata2Mumbai2

Key Topics

Section 92B4Section 143(3)3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 144C2Section 144B2Section 1532Section 1162Section 14A2Section 682Depreciation2Natural Justice2

ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 4, NEW DELHI vs. GARG ACRYLICS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5915/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mithun Shete, Sr.D.R
Section 116Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144CSection 14ASection 153Section 92B

purchases can be bogus; (h) That the Ld. AO have not pointed out any discrepancy in the books of accounts; I.T.As. No. 5214, 5915/Del/18 4 (i) That the assessee was not provided opportunity to cross examine Sh. R.P. Bhatia, whose statements have been used for making additions in the hands of assessee; (j) That the principle of natural justice

GARG ACRYLICS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 4, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5214/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mithun Shete, Sr.D.R
Section 116Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144CSection 14ASection 153Section 92B

purchases can be bogus; (h) That the Ld. AO have not pointed out any discrepancy in the books of accounts; I.T.As. No. 5214, 5915/Del/18 4 (i) That the assessee was not provided opportunity to cross examine Sh. R.P. Bhatia, whose statements have been used for making additions in the hands of assessee; (j) That the principle of natural justice

LATE SHRI SOM PRAKASH SETHI ( THROUGH LEGAL HEIR MR. AMAN SETHI),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CRICLE-28(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3670/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2016-17] Late Shri Som Prakash Sethi Vs Acit, (Through Legal Heir Mr. Aman Circle-28(1), Sethi), S-541, Greater Kailash New Delhi. Part-Ii, South Delhi, New Delhi-110048. Pan-Abyps3902L Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Akash Ojha, Adv. & Shri Mayank Patawri, Adv. Respondent By Shri Manish Gupta, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 26.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 22.08.2025 Order

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 68

purchase and sale transactions are carried out through banking channel and by transfer of shares. The prima facie bonafides of existence of transaction executed cannot thus be doubted. It is not the case of the revenue that the capital gain arising to Assessee in not in the nature of LTCG. The case of revenue is that such transactions