BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 80Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6Delhi6Ahmedabad2Nagpur2Kolkata1Panaji1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Addition to Income6Section 80C5Disallowance5Section 153C4Deduction3House Property3Section 44A2Section 682Section 145(3)2Section 442Bogus Purchases2Business Income2

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SHRI RAMIT VOHRA, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4373/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Kohli, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. DR

bogus purchase : 20,69,898 iii. Add: Claim of depreciation : Rs. 4,83,994 iv. Add: Interest Payment disallowed : Rs. 1,20,213 v. Add: Personal expenses : Rs. 18,482 1,52,50,621 3. INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES i. As per the return : NIL ii. Unexplained Sundry Creditor : Rs. 54,29,787 ii. Unexplained in capital

INCOME TAX OFFICER, DELHI vs. MOHD RIZWAN, DELHI

ITA 3535/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Income Tax Officer, Delhi. (Appellant)

For Appellant: None
For Respondent: Shri Abhijeet Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 80C

section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') and the Assessing Officer has estimated the income on alleged bogus purchases @ 25%. However, we observe from the record that Assessing Officer has not rejected the books of account and not brought on record the reasons for the same. After considering the submissions of the assessee

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SHRI BRIJ GOPAL CHAUHAN PROP., NOIDA

ITA 4679/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Mar 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Tarun Aswani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 145(3)Section 44ASection 68Section 80C

purchase of above property . Assessee submitted that the above payment of Rs. 46,26,000/- is made from over-draft account. This contention was rejected by the Assessing Officer as no further information was filed. Further addition of Rs. 8,000/- was made by disallowance under Section 80C of the Act. Thus the total income of the assessee was assessed

SHRI BRIJ GOPAL CHAUHAN,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

ITA 4163/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Tarun Aswani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 145(3)Section 44ASection 68Section 80C

purchase of above property . Assessee submitted that the above payment of Rs. 46,26,000/- is made from over-draft account. This contention was rejected by the Assessing Officer as no further information was filed. Further addition of Rs. 8,000/- was made by disallowance under Section 80C of the Act. Thus the total income of the assessee was assessed

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. BRIJ GOPAL CHAUHAN, DELHI

ITA 1843/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. R.K. Panda & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2010-11 Ito Brij Gopal Chauhan Ward- 60 (4), Room No.308- Vs A-7, Kondli F, Vikas Bhawan, I. P. Estate Delhi – 110096 New Delhi -110002 Pan Ahfpc5855M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 145Section 271Section 44Section 80D

purchase of Paints & Sanitary stores. He filed his return of income on 11.06.2010 declaring total income at Rs.4,62,460/-. The case was selected for scrutiny for the following reasons as mentioned by the Assessing Officer in the body of the assessment order :- 1. “Assessee has filed return of income for the A. Y. 2010-11 manually instead of filing

MEENA GUPTA,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 464/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13]

Section 153CSection 153DSection 234ASection 69ASection 80C

section 153C r.w.s 144 of the Act at a total income of Rs.1,45,44,630/-. A search and seizure action was carried out on the Rama and Param Group and other related cases on 28.02.2014 at various residential and business premises. Certain incriminating documents relating to the assessee were found during the said search which pertain to the impugned