80 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 69Bclear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 80 · Page 1 of 4
Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent
69B r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act. 6. That the Ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in law and in facts of the case in making enhancement of Rs. 1,62,648/- to the assessed income of the assessee without allowing any opportunity of being heard in this regard. 7. That the Ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in law and in facts