BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

152 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 391clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi152Mumbai113Karnataka99Jaipur42Ahmedabad27Chandigarh24Chennai22Bangalore22Indore19Kolkata11Surat6Lucknow5Pune3Allahabad3Rajkot2Patna1Raipur1Hyderabad1Agra1Guwahati1Amritsar1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 153C82Section 153A62Addition to Income60Section 143(3)50Section 13248Section 14739Search & Seizure25Section 14824Disallowance23

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9154/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

391 (Mum.), the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the said decision has held that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader and the additions are limited to the extent of bringing to G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

Showing 1–20 of 152 · Page 1 of 8

...
Section 37(1)22
Section 6822
Bogus Purchases20

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9157/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

391 (Mum.), the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the said decision has held that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader and the additions are limited to the extent of bringing to G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9158/DEL/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

391 (Mum.), the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the said decision has held that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader and the additions are limited to the extent of bringing to G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9156/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

391 (Mum.), the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the said decision has held that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader and the additions are limited to the extent of bringing to G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9155/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

391 (Mum.), the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the said decision has held that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader and the additions are limited to the extent of bringing to G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9153/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

391 (Mum.), the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the said decision has held that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader and the additions are limited to the extent of bringing to G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

LATA GARG,HARYANA vs. DCIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, ITA.No.7187/Del

ITA 7187/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: And Shri Shantnu Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

391 (Mum.), the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the said decision has held that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader and the additions are limited to the extent of bringing to G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

LATA GARG,HARYANA vs. DCIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, ITA.No.7187/Del

ITA 9145/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: And Shri Shantnu Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

391 (Mum.), the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the said decision has held that the purchases cannot be rejected without disturbing the sales in case of a trader and the additions are limited to the extent of bringing to G.P. rate on purchases at the same rate of other genuine purchases

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, DELHI

ITA 5520/DEL/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase disallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's twin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along with Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra). 4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and Revenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands. Learned Counsel representing assessee has filed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7838/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel andFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase disallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's twin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along with Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra). 4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and Revenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands. Learned Counsel representing assessee has filed

S.C., JOHNSON PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ADDI. CIT SPECIAL RANGE-8, NEW DELHI

ITA 1122/DEL/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Aug 2025AY 2008-09
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80I

Purchase\nmethod\" is a permissible method of accounting in cases of merger of\nwholly owned subsidiary under Accounting Standard-14 (\"AS\") and\nthe goodwill so computed in accordance has to amortize as disclosed\nin Scheme of Amalgamation read with AS-14.\n\n3.5 That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in upholding the alternative addition made

JCIT, (OSD) CC-1, NOIDA vs. IV COUNTY PVT. LTD., NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1357/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers

DCIT, CC-1, NOIDA vs. ABA BUILDERS LTD., NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1351/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers

COUNTRY INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CC-1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1166/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers

COUNTRY INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CC-1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1168/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers

IV COUNTY PVT. LTD.,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CC-1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1172/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers

IV COUNTY PVT. LTD.,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CC-1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1171/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers

COUNTRY INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CC-1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1167/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers

COUNTRY INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CC-1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1165/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers

JCIT,(OSD) CC-1, NOIDA vs. COUNTRY INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1356/DEL/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. M/S. Aba Builders Ltd, Central Circle-1, Noida A-39, Sector-63, Noida (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacca1410H Jcit (Osd), Vs. Iv County Pvt. Ltd, Central Circle-I, A-39, Sector-63, Noida, Noida Gautam Budh Nagar, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aacci9503M

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Kumar Jhan, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

391/-. The ld AO observed that the assessee had made purchases from the following parties:- a. M/s. Bahubali Iron & Steel Company Rs. 53,94,190/- b. M/s. Hariom Steel Rs. 16,20,519/- c. M/s. V. N. Enterprises Rs. 44,57,507/- Total Rs. 1,14,72,216/- 8.6 The ld AO based on discreet investigation made on this suppliers