BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

264 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 251clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai437Delhi264Jaipur124Karnataka105Chandigarh59Ahmedabad52Bangalore40Surat35Kolkata32Nagpur25Rajkot24Chennai23Pune20Raipur18Lucknow15Hyderabad14Guwahati12Indore10Amritsar10Cuttack5Visakhapatnam3Allahabad3Varanasi2Agra2Patna1Jodhpur1Jabalpur1Cochin1

Key Topics

Addition to Income61Section 6844Section 143(3)42Section 153A34Section 14732Section 14824Section 271(1)(c)22Section 153C20Section 14319

M/S. BECON CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal is partly allowed

ITA 5034/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Anil Chaturvedi(Through Video Conference) A.Y. : 2012-13

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 251(2)

section 251(2) of the Act has not been complied with. 2. The appellant craves leave for addition, modification, alteration, amendment of any of the grounds of appeal. 3. The brief facts in the case shows that assessee is a Private Limited Company wherein search u/s. 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as “Act”) was conducted

Showing 1–20 of 264 · Page 1 of 14

...
Search & Seizure19
Disallowance16
Bogus Purchases12

VAKSONS METAPLAST PVT LTD,DELHI vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), DELHI

In the result, the appeal, filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2218/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Smt. Rano Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, CIT DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 139Section 143Section 153Section 153CSection 234ASection 263Section 69C

bogus purchases made by the assessee, same as has been raised by your honour in your jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act as the show cause notice under section 263 of the Act is issued as on 04.12.2024. The provisions of Explanation-1 to sub-section (i) to section 263, clause (c) reads as follows:- "where any order referred

VAKSONS METAPLAST PVT LTD,DELHI vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), DELHI

In the result, the appeal, filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2216/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Smt. Rano Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, CIT DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 139Section 143Section 153Section 153CSection 234ASection 263Section 69C

bogus purchases made by the assessee, same as has been raised by your honour in your jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act as the show cause notice under section 263 of the Act is issued as on 04.12.2024. The provisions of Explanation-1 to sub-section (i) to section 263, clause (c) reads as follows:- "where any order referred

VAKSONS METAPLAST PVT LTD,DELHI vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), DELHI

In the result, the appeal, filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2217/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Smt. Rano Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, CIT DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 139Section 143Section 153Section 153CSection 234ASection 263Section 69C

bogus purchases made by the assessee, same as has been raised by your honour in your jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act as the show cause notice under section 263 of the Act is issued as on 04.12.2024. The provisions of Explanation-1 to sub-section (i) to section 263, clause (c) reads as follows:- "where any order referred

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 28 , NEW DELHI vs. AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD., DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 5265/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 3745/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. ACIT CC-28, NEW DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 3746/DEL/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. ACIT CC-28, NEW DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 3742/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 28 , NEW DELHI vs. AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD., DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 5268/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 28 , NEW DELHI vs. AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD., DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 5269/DEL/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 3743/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. ACIT CC-28, NEW DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 3741/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 28 , NEW DELHI vs. AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD., DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 5264/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 28 , NEW DELHI vs. AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD., DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 5267/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 28 , NEW DELHI vs. AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD., DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 5266/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

AGSON GLOBAL PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. ACIT CC-28, NEW DELHI

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and 6 appeals of the ld AO are dismissed

ITA 3744/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Goyal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143Section 153A

bogus purchase whereas, the Ld CIT(A) has restrict disallowance to the extent of estimated GP @16.20% . 2. That the grounds of appeal are without prejudice to each other.” 22. Identical grounds have been raised by the ld AO for Ay 2013-14 to 2016-17 except in case of 2017-18 where in ground no 1 is with respect

HARISH NARANG,PANIPAT vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHTAK, ROHTAK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 3637/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma& Shri Amitabh Shukla[Assessment Year: 2018-19] Harish Narang, The Principal Commissioner Of H. No.238, Ward No.8, Income Tax, Rohtak, Panipat, Haryana-132103 Vs Aayakar Bhawan, Opp. Mansarover Park, Rohtak, Haryana-124001 Pan:Acvpn4090J Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Amit Kaushik, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Amisha S. Gupt, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 16.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31.12.2025

Section 144BSection 147Section 263Section 69C

bogus purchases were liable for disallowance under section 37(1) of the Act as they were not incurred for business purposes. The ld. PCIT, Rohtak examined the impugned order dated 16.03.2023 of the ld. AO and concluded that since the same was passed without applying the provisions of section 69C of the Act r.w.s

S R METAL COMPANY,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 63(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 4611/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda[Assessment Year: 2010-11]

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

section 69C. Accordingly, entire bogus purchases amounting to Rs. 94,12,375/- is confirmed. Grounds of appeal nos. 1, 2 and 3 are dismissed.” 4. Aggrieved with such order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal by raising the following grounds:- 1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case

RAM NIWAS GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-46(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3787/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri D.C. Agarwal, Adv. & Shri R.NFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

bogus purchases. 3. Whereas, in Revenue’s appeal the only dispute is with regard to deletion of unexplained credit of Rs.1,40,92,683/- of M/s. Metal Impex. 4. The facts in brief are that assessee is an individual engaged in the business of trading of metals and alloys. The Assessing Officer in the assessment order has first

ACIT CIRCLE-46(1), NEW DELHI vs. RAM NIWAS GUPTA, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4886/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri D.C. Agarwal, Adv. & Shri R.NFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

bogus purchases. 3. Whereas, in Revenue’s appeal the only dispute is with regard to deletion of unexplained credit of Rs.1,40,92,683/- of M/s. Metal Impex. 4. The facts in brief are that assessee is an individual engaged in the business of trading of metals and alloys. The Assessing Officer in the assessment order has first