BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore11Jaipur8Nagpur6Mumbai6Raipur5Kolkata3Delhi3Panaji3Hyderabad1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 689Section 12A7Section 1473Section 1322Section 246A2Addition to Income2

SANJAY KAUL

ITA/203/2020HC Delhi29 Jul 2020
Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 260Section 68Section 69CSection 70

purchase and sale of the shares of following three listed companies: S.No. Description STCL (Rs.) 1. Cressanda Solutions Ltd. 24,66,430 2. Kailash Auto Finance Ltd. 42,52,805 3. Matra Kaushal Enterprises Ltd. (‘MKEL’) 55,55,067 Total 1,22,76,352 3. The AO framed the assessment order dated 27.12.2017 under section

INCOME TAX OFFICER, I P ESTATE vs. BANSAL INSULATION PRODUCTS PVT LTD., OKHLA DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed as

ITA 2892/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Delhi
30 Sept 2025
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M Balaganeshआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2892/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Bansal Insulation Products P. Ltd. C.R. Building, C-54/3, Okhla Industrial Area, I.P. Estate, Delhi. Phase-Ii, Delhi. Pan No.Aaacb5035F अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & Co No.79/Del/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita No.2892/Del/2024) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 बनाम Bansal Insulation Products P. Ltd. Income Tax Officer, C-54/3, Okhla Industrial Area, Vs. C.R. Building, Phase-Ii, Delhi. I.P. Estate, Delhi. Pan No.Aaacb5035F अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 68

bogus as alleged by the AO, the impugned purchases which is around 50% of total purchases of material by the assessee has to be reduced from the total quantity of material purchased/consumed production of finished goods which is required for admitted sale executed by the assessee during the year. 7. The CIT (A) has observed that the AO has failed

LAKHMI CHAND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. PCIT CENTRAL 3, NEW DELHI

ITA 1803/DEL/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Ms.Madhumita Roylakhmi Chand Vs. Principal Commissioner Charitable Society, Of Income Tax, Central-3 Elephanta Lane, Behind Room No. 325, 3Rd Floor, Sector-10/6 Market, New Income Tax Building, E-3 Golak Dham, Sector-10, Ara Centre, Jhandewalan Dwarka, Extension, New Delhi - 110075 New Delhi - 110055

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr.AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty
Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12(1)Section 127(2)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 246ASection 80G

246A of the Act pending before the Ld. CIT(A)-30, New Delhi. 4. Surprisingly, after finalizing the assessment proceedings on 29.03.2022 the Ld. AO sent a proposal for cancellation of registration on 04.05.2022 whereupon Ld. PCIT, Central-3, New Delhi issued show cause notice dated 05.07.2023 to the appellant but the same was withdrawn and thus proceeding for cancellation