BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

112 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 153Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi112Mumbai85Chandigarh58Cochin57Bangalore46Amritsar39Chennai22Jaipur20Allahabad17Agra14Nagpur12Raipur8Lucknow8Dehradun6Indore3Ahmedabad3Pune1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 153A116Section 153C109Section 153D88Addition to Income88Section 143(3)80Section 14762Section 14844Section 13232Search & Seizure32Disallowance

ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-18, NEW DELHI vs. JAGANANTH HEMCHAND JAIN, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as Cross Objection of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 7755/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Feb 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 69C

bogus purchase transactions from Kriya controlled by Jain & Choudhary Group. These parties have in unequivocal terms I.T.A. Nos.7754 & 7755/Del/2018 11 CO Nos.15 & 16/Del/2023 admitted in the course of search that they were not doing any real business and were only providing false accommodation entries. These parties/suppliers have also admitted that no physical goods were handed over by them

Showing 1–20 of 112 · Page 1 of 6

29
Natural Justice21
Section 145(3)20

ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-18, NEW DELHI vs. JAGANANTH HEMCHAND JAIN, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as Cross Objection of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 7754/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Feb 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 69C

bogus purchase transactions from Kriya controlled by Jain & Choudhary Group. These parties have in unequivocal terms I.T.A. Nos.7754 & 7755/Del/2018 11 CO Nos.15 & 16/Del/2023 admitted in the course of search that they were not doing any real business and were only providing false accommodation entries. These parties/suppliers have also admitted that no physical goods were handed over by them

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, NOIDA, NOIDA vs. SURENDER GUPTA, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and of the Revenue is dismissed as discussed hereinabove

ITA 2872/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.1670 To 1672/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Surender Gupta, Dy. Cit, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Central Circle-30, H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Vs. Delhi. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Dy. Cit, Surender Gupta, Central Circle-1, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Noida. Vs. H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Mayank Patwari, Adv. & Shri Aakash Ojha, Adv. Department By Ms. Rajinder Kaur, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: The Captioned Cross Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against Three Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A) In Short”] U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act In Short”], All Are Dated 24.02.2025 Against The Orders Of The Assessing Officer U/S 153A R.W.S Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 Surender Gupta Vs. Dcit 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” For Short) For Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Respectively.

Section 127Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

153D as the same being mechanical and thus invalid. Before us the Ld. AR of the assessee has not pressed the additional grounds of appeal, therefore, the same is dismissed. 5. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual filed his return of income on 27.09.2018 declaring total income of Rs.2,18,13,670/-. A search

SURENDER GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and of the Revenue is dismissed as discussed hereinabove

ITA 1672/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.1670 To 1672/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Surender Gupta, Dy. Cit, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Central Circle-30, H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Vs. Delhi. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Dy. Cit, Surender Gupta, Central Circle-1, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Noida. Vs. H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Mayank Patwari, Adv. & Shri Aakash Ojha, Adv. Department By Ms. Rajinder Kaur, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: The Captioned Cross Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against Three Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A) In Short”] U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act In Short”], All Are Dated 24.02.2025 Against The Orders Of The Assessing Officer U/S 153A R.W.S Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 Surender Gupta Vs. Dcit 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” For Short) For Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Respectively.

Section 127Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

153D as the same being mechanical and thus invalid. Before us the Ld. AR of the assessee has not pressed the additional grounds of appeal, therefore, the same is dismissed. 5. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual filed his return of income on 27.09.2018 declaring total income of Rs.2,18,13,670/-. A search

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE I NOIDA, NOIDA vs. SURENDER GUPTA, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and of the Revenue is dismissed as discussed hereinabove

ITA 2871/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.1670 To 1672/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Surender Gupta, Dy. Cit, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Central Circle-30, H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Vs. Delhi. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Dy. Cit, Surender Gupta, Central Circle-1, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Noida. Vs. H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Mayank Patwari, Adv. & Shri Aakash Ojha, Adv. Department By Ms. Rajinder Kaur, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: The Captioned Cross Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against Three Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A) In Short”] U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act In Short”], All Are Dated 24.02.2025 Against The Orders Of The Assessing Officer U/S 153A R.W.S Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 Surender Gupta Vs. Dcit 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” For Short) For Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Respectively.

Section 127Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

153D as the same being mechanical and thus invalid. Before us the Ld. AR of the assessee has not pressed the additional grounds of appeal, therefore, the same is dismissed. 5. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual filed his return of income on 27.09.2018 declaring total income of Rs.2,18,13,670/-. A search

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NOIDA, NOIDA vs. SURENDER GUPTA, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and of the Revenue is dismissed as discussed hereinabove

ITA 2873/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.1670 To 1672/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Surender Gupta, Dy. Cit, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Central Circle-30, H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Vs. Delhi. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Dy. Cit, Surender Gupta, Central Circle-1, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Noida. Vs. H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Mayank Patwari, Adv. & Shri Aakash Ojha, Adv. Department By Ms. Rajinder Kaur, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: The Captioned Cross Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against Three Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A) In Short”] U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act In Short”], All Are Dated 24.02.2025 Against The Orders Of The Assessing Officer U/S 153A R.W.S Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 Surender Gupta Vs. Dcit 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” For Short) For Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Respectively.

Section 127Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

153D as the same being mechanical and thus invalid. Before us the Ld. AR of the assessee has not pressed the additional grounds of appeal, therefore, the same is dismissed. 5. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual filed his return of income on 27.09.2018 declaring total income of Rs.2,18,13,670/-. A search

SURENDER GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and of the Revenue is dismissed as discussed hereinabove

ITA 1670/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.1670 To 1672/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Surender Gupta, Dy. Cit, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Central Circle-30, H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Vs. Delhi. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Dy. Cit, Surender Gupta, Central Circle-1, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Noida. Vs. H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Mayank Patwari, Adv. & Shri Aakash Ojha, Adv. Department By Ms. Rajinder Kaur, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: The Captioned Cross Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against Three Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A) In Short”] U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act In Short”], All Are Dated 24.02.2025 Against The Orders Of The Assessing Officer U/S 153A R.W.S Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 Surender Gupta Vs. Dcit 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” For Short) For Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Respectively.

Section 127Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

153D as the same being mechanical and thus invalid. Before us the Ld. AR of the assessee has not pressed the additional grounds of appeal, therefore, the same is dismissed. 5. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual filed his return of income on 27.09.2018 declaring total income of Rs.2,18,13,670/-. A search

SURENDER GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and of the Revenue is dismissed as discussed hereinabove

ITA 1671/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalita Nos.1670 To 1672/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Surender Gupta, Dy. Cit, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Central Circle-30, H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Vs. Delhi. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Dy. Cit, Surender Gupta, Central Circle-1, A-27, Phase-1, Ashok Vihar, Noida. Vs. H.O. North West Delhi-110052. Pan-Aaopg2234J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Mayank Patwari, Adv. & Shri Aakash Ojha, Adv. Department By Ms. Rajinder Kaur, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: The Captioned Cross Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against Three Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A) In Short”] U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act In Short”], All Are Dated 24.02.2025 Against The Orders Of The Assessing Officer U/S 153A R.W.S Ita Nos.2871 To 2873/Del/2025 Surender Gupta Vs. Dcit 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” For Short) For Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Respectively.

Section 127Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153DSection 250

153D as the same being mechanical and thus invalid. Before us the Ld. AR of the assessee has not pressed the additional grounds of appeal, therefore, the same is dismissed. 5. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual filed his return of income on 27.09.2018 declaring total income of Rs.2,18,13,670/-. A search

RITU KAPUR,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 743/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shrimanish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153DSection 69A

purchase consideration of shares.” Ritu Kapoor Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA vs. RITU KAPUR, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 996/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shrimanish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153DSection 69A

purchase consideration of shares.” Ritu Kapoor Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

RITU KAPUR,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 744/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shrimanish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153DSection 69A

purchase consideration of shares.” Ritu Kapoor Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

RITU KAPUR,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 745/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shrimanish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153DSection 69A

purchase consideration of shares.” Ritu Kapoor Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA vs. RAGHAV BAHL, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA

ITA 995/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153D

purchase consideration of shares. Raghav Bahl Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

RAGHAV BAHL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA

ITA 742/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153D

purchase consideration of shares. Raghav Bahl Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

RAGHAV BAHL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA

ITA 739/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153D

purchase consideration of shares. Raghav Bahl Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

RAGHAV BAHL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA

ITA 740/DEL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153D

purchase consideration of shares. Raghav Bahl Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

RAGHAV BAHL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA

In the result, Appeals filed by the Assessee in ITA

ITA 741/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 120Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 153D

purchase consideration of shares. Raghav Bahl Vs. DCIT 3. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation conducted u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) on 11/10/2018 in the premises of the Assessee comprising M/s PMC Group cases. Various residential and business premises of the Assessee were covered under the search operation

MIRHA EXPORTS PRIVATE LTD. ,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, GZBD, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed and both appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 656/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalsl. Ita No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 873/Del/2022 2012-13 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt.Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 2. 655/Del/2022 2012-13 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit (Assessee’S Appeal) Pvt.Ltd. Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Ghaziabad Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 3. 1233/Del/2022 2013-14 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 4. 656/Del/2022 2013-14 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit (Assessee’S Appeal) Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle Ghaziabad 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 5. 1234/Del/2022 2015-16 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 6. 657/Del/2022 2015-16 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit Pvt. Ltd. (Assessee’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Ghaziabad Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. 7. 874/Del/2022 2016-17 Dcit (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 8. 658/Del/2022 2016-17 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit Pvt. Ltd. (Assessee’S Appeal) Central Circle Ghaziabad 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. 9. 875/Del/2022 2017-18 Dcit (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P

Section 133ASection 142Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153CSection 250

bogus expenses claimed. Expenses were not fully verifiable due to nature of payments made and as observed above the trading results were accepted. 23. It is further seen that no incriminating paper was found as a result of search with respect to the cash purchases made nor any satisfaction of escapement of income of such cash purchases was reached

MIRHA EXPORTS PRIVATE LTD. ,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, GZBD, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed and both appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 657/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalsl. Ita No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 873/Del/2022 2012-13 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt.Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 2. 655/Del/2022 2012-13 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit (Assessee’S Appeal) Pvt.Ltd. Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Ghaziabad Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 3. 1233/Del/2022 2013-14 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 4. 656/Del/2022 2013-14 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit (Assessee’S Appeal) Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle Ghaziabad 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 5. 1234/Del/2022 2015-16 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 6. 657/Del/2022 2015-16 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit Pvt. Ltd. (Assessee’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Ghaziabad Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. 7. 874/Del/2022 2016-17 Dcit (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 8. 658/Del/2022 2016-17 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit Pvt. Ltd. (Assessee’S Appeal) Central Circle Ghaziabad 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. 9. 875/Del/2022 2017-18 Dcit (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P

Section 133ASection 142Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153CSection 250

bogus expenses claimed. Expenses were not fully verifiable due to nature of payments made and as observed above the trading results were accepted. 23. It is further seen that no incriminating paper was found as a result of search with respect to the cash purchases made nor any satisfaction of escapement of income of such cash purchases was reached

MIRHA EXPORTS PRIVATE LTD. ,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, GZBD , U.P

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed and both appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 655/DEL/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalsl. Ita No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 873/Del/2022 2012-13 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt.Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 2. 655/Del/2022 2012-13 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit (Assessee’S Appeal) Pvt.Ltd. Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Ghaziabad Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 3. 1233/Del/2022 2013-14 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 4. 656/Del/2022 2013-14 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit (Assessee’S Appeal) Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle Ghaziabad 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 5. 1234/Del/2022 2015-16 Dcit M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 6. 657/Del/2022 2015-16 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit Pvt. Ltd. (Assessee’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Ghaziabad Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. 7. 874/Del/2022 2016-17 Dcit (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P 8. 658/Del/2022 2016-17 M/S. Mirha Exports Dcit Pvt. Ltd. (Assessee’S Appeal) Central Circle Ghaziabad 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P M/S. Mirha Exports Pvt. Ltd. 9. 875/Del/2022 2017-18 Dcit (Revenue’S Appeal) Central Circle 30, Bazar Lane, Bengali Ghaziabad Market, Central Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaacm8612P

Section 133ASection 142Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153CSection 250

bogus expenses claimed. Expenses were not fully verifiable due to nature of payments made and as observed above the trading results were accepted. 23. It is further seen that no incriminating paper was found as a result of search with respect to the cash purchases made nor any satisfaction of escapement of income of such cash purchases was reached