BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 149Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7Delhi3Jaipur3Surat2Indore1

Key Topics

Section 14825Section 148A14Section 1473Section 1492Reopening of Assessment2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar2Bogus Purchases2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITO, NEW DELHI vs. AMBADEEP INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, SRIVASTVA MARKET

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1875/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ambadeep Infrastructure Pvt. New Delhi Ltd., 453/22, Srivastva Market, New Delhi Pan: Aaica1328G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Sh. Rajesh Tiwari, Sr. Dr

Section 147Section 148Section 148A

purchases of the appellant are bogus in nature against which the appellant submitted its reply on 07.06.2022. 5. The AO passed order u/s 148A(d) of the IT Act, 1961 on 24.07.2022 as well as issued notice u/s 148 (under the amended provision) of the IT Act, 1961 on 24.07.2022. In this ground of appeal, the appellant challenged the notice

DCIT, VIKASH BHAWAN vs. RAJAN KUMAR, DELHI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 136/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Amitabh Shukladcit, Vs. Rajan Kumar Room No. 218, 2Nd Floor, 31, Vijay Block, D-Block, Vikas Bhawan, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi Delhi (Pan: Caapk8381E) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Mukesh Jain, CA & Sh. Samyak Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Jitender Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149

purchases of the assessee are bogus in nature. Against the notice dated 27.05.2022, the assesee duly submitted reply and detailed submission on 25.06.2022. He further submitted that without considering the submission of the assessee, AO passed the order u/s 148A(d) of the Act dated 19.07.2022 and initiated re-assessment proceedings (copy placed at Page

SHIVANI TAYAL,NEW DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 49(1), NEW DELHI, DELHI

In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 5833/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Sh. Yogesh Kumar U.S.Shivani Tayal Vs. Income Tax Officer, C-27, Shop No.9-10, Ward 49(1), Mansarovar Garden, New New Delhi Delhi Pan: Andpt8647E Appellant Respondent Assessee By Advocate Ragini Handa Revenue By Sh. Sahil Kumar Bansal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06/05/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 13/06/2025 Order Per Yogesh Kumar, U.S. Jm: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Cit(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘Nfac’ For Short) Dated

Section 10(38)Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 250Section 69C

bogus purchases. 7. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the addition despite the fact that notice u/s 148 was issued without a document identification number and therefore, the same is without jurisdiction and deserves to be quashed. 8. That on the facts and circumstances