BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

638 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 132(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai971Delhi638Chennai212Jaipur181Bangalore143Kolkata140Ahmedabad106Chandigarh103Hyderabad84Surat78Cochin57Pune50Visakhapatnam43Amritsar43Guwahati41Indore37Raipur34Allahabad28Nagpur27Agra23Jodhpur19Patna18Rajkot17Lucknow17Ranchi11Dehradun7Jabalpur3Cuttack3Panaji1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Addition to Income74Section 153A55Section 13246Section 153C44Section 14841Section 14741Search & Seizure35Section 6832Disallowance29

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7840/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase disallowance/addition of `13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue’s twin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along with Section 69A addition of `40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra). 4

Showing 1–20 of 638 · Page 1 of 32

...
Section 143(3)26
Section 153D21
Reassessment16

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -05 , DELHI

ITA 5521/DEL/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase disallowance/addition of `13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue’s twin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along with Section 69A addition of `40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra). 4

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7842/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase disallowance/addition of `13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue’s twin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along with Section 69A addition of `40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra). 4

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 05, DELHI

ITA 5516/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, DELHI

ITA 5519/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2022-23
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7838/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel andFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7839/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4.\nWe have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, DELHI

ITA 5520/DEL/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2023-24
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 05, DELHI

ITA 5515/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2018-19
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4.\nWe have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 05, DELHI

ITA 5518/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4.\nWe have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7843/DEL/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2023-24
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, DELHI

ITA 5517/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4.\nWe have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7841/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4.\nWe have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7844/DEL/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2024-25
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

bogus purchase\ndisallowance/addition of ₹13,52,382/- as well whereas the Revenue's\ntwin substantive grounds seek to uphold the same in entirety along\nwith Section 69A addition of ₹40,18,132/- hereinabove (supra).\n4.\nWe have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee and\nRevenue's vehement submissions reiterating their respective stands.\nLearned Counsel representing assessee has filed

PCIT (CENTRAL) - 3 vs. ANAND KUMAR JAIN (HUF)

ITA/23/2021HC Delhi12 Feb 2021
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

purchased shares of an unlisted private company in 2010. This unlisted company then merged with another unlisted company, M/s Focus Industrial Resources Ltd. and shares of this merged entity were allotted to the Assessee. Subsequently, the merged entity allotted further bonus shares to the Assessee and thereafter it was listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Assessee sold these shares

PCIT (CENTRAL) - 3 vs. ANAND KUMAR JAIN (HUF)

ITA/27/2021HC Delhi12 Feb 2021
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

purchased shares of an unlisted private company in 2010. This unlisted company then merged with another unlisted company, M/s Focus Industrial Resources Ltd. and shares of this merged entity were allotted to the Assessee. Subsequently, the merged entity allotted further bonus shares to the Assessee and thereafter it was listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Assessee sold these shares

PCIT (CENTRAL) - 3 vs. ANAND KUMAR JAIN (HUF)

ITA/26/2021HC Delhi12 Feb 2021
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

purchased shares of an unlisted private company in 2010. This unlisted company then merged with another unlisted company, M/s Focus Industrial Resources Ltd. and shares of this merged entity were allotted to the Assessee. Subsequently, the merged entity allotted further bonus shares to the Assessee and thereafter it was listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Assessee sold these shares

PCIT (CENTRAL) - 3 vs. ANAND KUMAR JAIN (HUF)

ITA/29/2021HC Delhi12 Feb 2021
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

purchased shares of an unlisted private company in 2010. This unlisted company then merged with another unlisted company, M/s Focus Industrial Resources Ltd. and shares of this merged entity were allotted to the Assessee. Subsequently, the merged entity allotted further bonus shares to the Assessee and thereafter it was listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Assessee sold these shares

PCIT (CENTRAL) - 3 vs. ANAND KUMAR JAIN (HUF)

ITA/30/2021HC Delhi12 Feb 2021
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

purchased shares of an unlisted private company in 2010. This unlisted company then merged with another unlisted company, M/s Focus Industrial Resources Ltd. and shares of this merged entity were allotted to the Assessee. Subsequently, the merged entity allotted further bonus shares to the Assessee and thereafter it was listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Assessee sold these shares

PCIT (CENTRAL) - 3 vs. ANAND KUMAR JAIN (HUF)

ITA/31/2021HC Delhi12 Feb 2021
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

purchased shares of an unlisted private company in 2010. This unlisted company then merged with another unlisted company, M/s Focus Industrial Resources Ltd. and shares of this merged entity were allotted to the Assessee. Subsequently, the merged entity allotted further bonus shares to the Assessee and thereafter it was listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Assessee sold these shares