BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,242 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 132(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,828Delhi1,242Jaipur357Chennai263Bangalore227Surat211Kolkata208Ahmedabad159Chandigarh147Hyderabad143Pune125Karnataka104Nagpur69Indore64Cochin60Visakhapatnam56Amritsar52Raipur48Guwahati42Calcutta34Allahabad29Agra24Jodhpur20Patna19Lucknow18Rajkot18Cuttack17Ranchi12Dehradun7Jabalpur4Gauhati2Telangana2Varanasi2Panaji1

Key Topics

Addition to Income74Section 153A72Section 153C62Section 13249Search & Seizure45Section 14742Section 143(3)40Section 69A25Disallowance23

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1467/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 1,242 · Page 1 of 63

...
Section 6822
Bogus Purchases20
Section 14819
ITA 1186/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1180/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1465/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1190/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1189/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1469/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1466/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1464/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1470/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1182/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1181/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1185/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

132 (4A) as well as under section 292C of the Income Tax Act. xx. He further pressed into service an argument that if the purchases are found to be bogus and if the sales are recorded in the books of accounts, then the addition can only be made with respect to the gross profit to that extent. He submitted that

PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH PVT. LTD.,,NOIDA vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 5087/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri I. C. Sudhir & Shri O. P. Kanti.T. Appeal Nos. 5087 To 5091/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 3492 N A N D I.T. Appeal Nos. 5062 To 5066/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 5726 F (Appellants) (Respondents) Assessee By : Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. A.; Department By : Ms. Paramita Tripathy, Cit [Dr]; Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.06.2017 O R D E R Per I. C. Sudhir, J. M. :

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. AFor Respondent: Ms. Paramita Tripathy, CIT [DR]
Section 153A

132 of the Act was conducted on 13.02.2013 on the premises of Panchsheel Group of cases. Consequently, notice under section 153A was issued. In response thereto assessee filed returns of income for the assessment years under consideration. The Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the genuineness of the claimed purchases and thus made disallowances on account of the alleged bogus

PANCHSHEEL REALTECH PVT. LTD.,NOIDA vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 5062/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri I. C. Sudhir & Shri O. P. Kanti.T. Appeal Nos. 5087 To 5091/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 3492 N A N D I.T. Appeal Nos. 5062 To 5066/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 5726 F (Appellants) (Respondents) Assessee By : Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. A.; Department By : Ms. Paramita Tripathy, Cit [Dr]; Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.06.2017 O R D E R Per I. C. Sudhir, J. M. :

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. AFor Respondent: Ms. Paramita Tripathy, CIT [DR]
Section 153A

132 of the Act was conducted on 13.02.2013 on the premises of Panchsheel Group of cases. Consequently, notice under section 153A was issued. In response thereto assessee filed returns of income for the assessment years under consideration. The Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the genuineness of the claimed purchases and thus made disallowances on account of the alleged bogus

SANJEEV KUMAR AGGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 6, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 2871/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT-D.R
Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

purchase and sale of gold) of the assessee was utilised for obtaining accommodation entries of bogus long term capital gain in the hands of family members of the assessee and material was confronted to the assessee. Therefore, it is a case of concealment of income under section 271(1)(c) of the 11 ITA.No.2871/Del./2018 Shri Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9155/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

1) determining at the returned income. 2.2. A search under section 132 of the Act was conducted on 28.02.2017 at the business premises of the assessee at various premises from where certain papers/ documents belonging to the assessee were found and seized. In response to notice under section 153A of the I.T. Act, 1961 the assessee filed its return

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9156/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

1) determining at the returned income. 2.2. A search under section 132 of the Act was conducted on 28.02.2017 at the business premises of the assessee at various premises from where certain papers/ documents belonging to the assessee were found and seized. In response to notice under section 153A of the I.T. Act, 1961 the assessee filed its return

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9157/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

1) determining at the returned income. 2.2. A search under section 132 of the Act was conducted on 28.02.2017 at the business premises of the assessee at various premises from where certain papers/ documents belonging to the assessee were found and seized. In response to notice under section 153A of the I.T. Act, 1961 the assessee filed its return

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9158/DEL/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

1) determining at the returned income. 2.2. A search under section 132 of the Act was conducted on 28.02.2017 at the business premises of the assessee at various premises from where certain papers/ documents belonging to the assessee were found and seized. In response to notice under section 153A of the I.T. Act, 1961 the assessee filed its return