BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

308 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 131(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai617Delhi308Jaipur131Kolkata128Bangalore94Ahmedabad78Chennai74Cochin57Hyderabad45Chandigarh38Indore32Raipur31Pune28Rajkot27Surat26Guwahati24Nagpur23Visakhapatnam14Lucknow9Agra8Varanasi7Patna6Jodhpur5Cuttack3Allahabad2Amritsar1Panaji1

Key Topics

Addition to Income82Section 143(3)77Section 14853Section 14753Disallowance35Section 153A34Section 6829Natural Justice24Reassessment22

RICHMOND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. DCIT/ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 4779/DEL/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2026AY 2024-25
For Respondent: \nShri Gaurav Jain, Adv
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

d) any income which is deemed to be income under the twenty-first\nproviso to clause (23C) of section 10 or which is not excluded from the\ntotal income under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 13; or\n(e) any income which is not excluded from the total income under clause\n(c) of sub-section (1

DCIT, CC-20 , NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT.LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

Showing 1–20 of 308 · Page 1 of 16

...
Reopening of Assessment21
Section 13118
Bogus Purchases16
ITA 939/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARAMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 931/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 942/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1855/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-20 , DELHI vs. KWALITY TECHMECH PVT. LTD. , DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 937/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT,CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 940/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGRO FOODS PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 2420/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

PARMANAND & SONS FOOD PRODUCT PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-20

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 980/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT,CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 943/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1329/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1330/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1854/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 933/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL , DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 941/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARAMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 932/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 934/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGRO FOODS PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 2419/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL , DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 944/DEL/2022[2017--18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543

PARMANAND & SONS FOOD PRODUCT PVT. LTD, ,DELHI vs. DCIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-20

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 981/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whom the assessee chose not to cross-examine despite being given an opportunity to do so. 10. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in placing reliance on the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases of PCIT vs Sh. Pinaki D Panani (ITA No1543