BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,193 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 13(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,665Delhi2,193Kolkata649Jaipur573Chennai474Ahmedabad445Surat370Bangalore326Pune298Chandigarh240Hyderabad210Indore181Raipur140Karnataka125Amritsar106Rajkot106Nagpur100Visakhapatnam73Cochin64Lucknow64Cuttack61Guwahati52Calcutta46Agra40Jodhpur40Allahabad35Patna26Ranchi20Telangana15Dehradun13Jabalpur10Varanasi7SC6Panaji5Orissa2Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income78Section 14763Section 153A62Section 143(3)47Section 6845Search & Seizure39Section 13236Section 14832Disallowance27

RICHMOND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. DCIT/ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4779/DEL/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2026AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Revenue byFor Respondent: Shri Gaurav Jain, Adv
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

purchased by or on behalf of the trust or institution from any person referred to in sub-section (3) during the previous year for consideration which is more than adequate; (f) if any share, security or other property is sold by or on behalf of the trust or institution to any person referred to in sub-section (3) during

ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S. SPACE AGE RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, MEERUT

Showing 1–20 of 2,193 · Page 1 of 110

...
Section 69A25
Section 133(6)19
Reassessment14

In the result Ground No. 1 and 3 of the appeal of the revenue is allowed and ground No

ITA 4622/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiacit, Space Age Research & Vs. Circle-2, Meerut Technology Foundation, Charitable Trust, Railway Road, Meerut Pan: Aabts7321M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjeev Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. SS Rana, CIT DR
Section 13(2)Section 13(3)Section 68

Purchases. Perusal of above shows that the assessee has made bogus entries for payment to contractors in his books of account. It is clearly shows that the management of M/s Space Age Research & Charitable Trust, Meerut is siphoning the found of the society by misappropriation of accounts by way of making advance payment under the head of construction of buildings

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1467/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1185/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1181/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1465/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1182/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1470/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1469/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1190/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1180/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1466/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1186/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1189/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1464/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 153A/143 (3) of the Act on 30.12.2016 at a total income of ₹ 39,39,74,557/–. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the learned assessing officer before the learned CIT – A, who passed an order on 26/12/2017 wherein he deleted (1) addition on account of ₹ 5,300,000/- being shares issued to Shri Vijay

AMQ AGRO INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 2805/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 2805/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 2806/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 M/S Amq Agro India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income C-134, Ground Floor, Defence Tax, Central Circle-19, Colony, New Delhi-110024 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaeca0929M

For Appellant: Sh. Sh. Hiren Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Ms. Pramita M. Biswas, CIT DR
Section 153A

section 40A(3) of L T. Act. 8.1.2 In view of above, it is held that the AO was justified in treating the expenses on account of purchases of Rs.21,94,53,432/- as bogus and unexplained. In such situation, whether entire amount of purchases has to be added back or the profit margin embedded in such amount would

AMQ AGRO INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 2806/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 2805/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 2806/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 M/S Amq Agro India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income C-134, Ground Floor, Defence Tax, Central Circle-19, Colony, New Delhi-110024 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaeca0929M

For Appellant: Sh. Sh. Hiren Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Ms. Pramita M. Biswas, CIT DR
Section 153A

section 40A(3) of L T. Act. 8.1.2 In view of above, it is held that the AO was justified in treating the expenses on account of purchases of Rs.21,94,53,432/- as bogus and unexplained. In such situation, whether entire amount of purchases has to be added back or the profit margin embedded in such amount would

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI vs. AMQ AGRO INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4409/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 2805/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 2806/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 M/S Amq Agro India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income C-134, Ground Floor, Defence Tax, Central Circle-19, Colony, New Delhi-110024 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaeca0929M

For Appellant: Sh. Sh. Hiren Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Ms. Pramita M. Biswas, CIT DR
Section 153A

section 40A(3) of L T. Act. 8.1.2 In view of above, it is held that the AO was justified in treating the expenses on account of purchases of Rs.21,94,53,432/- as bogus and unexplained. In such situation, whether entire amount of purchases has to be added back or the profit margin embedded in such amount would

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI vs. AMQ AGRO INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4408/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 2805/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 2806/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 M/S Amq Agro India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income C-134, Ground Floor, Defence Tax, Central Circle-19, Colony, New Delhi-110024 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaeca0929M

For Appellant: Sh. Sh. Hiren Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Ms. Pramita M. Biswas, CIT DR
Section 153A

section 40A(3) of L T. Act. 8.1.2 In view of above, it is held that the AO was justified in treating the expenses on account of purchases of Rs.21,94,53,432/- as bogus and unexplained. In such situation, whether entire amount of purchases has to be added back or the profit margin embedded in such amount would

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NOIDA vs. SHIV SHAKTI CONSTRUCTION, GREATER NOIDA

In the result, all the Revenue’s Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2834/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Harish Choudhary CAFor Respondent: Shri H.K. Choudhary, CIT-DR

13. We have carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the respective assessment orders, respective CIT(A) orders as well as the material placed on record. The controversy involves correctness of estimated disallowances made by the Assessing Officer towards alleged bogus purchases, violation of Section 40A(3