LAKHMI CHAND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. PCIT CENTRAL 3, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Ms.Madhumita Roylakhmi Chand Vs. Principal Commissioner Charitable Society, Of Income Tax, Central-3 Elephanta Lane, Behind Room No. 325, 3Rd Floor, Sector-10/6 Market, New Income Tax Building, E-3 Golak Dham, Sector-10, Ara Centre, Jhandewalan Dwarka, Extension, New Delhi - 110075 New Delhi - 110055

c). (AY involved 2020-21 & 2021-22) (Pg 195- 200) • Unsecured loan entries taken by the society and subsequent conversion of unsecured loans into Corpus Donation, received from 5 different companies from year 2008 to 2013 and converted into corpus donation during FY 2016-17, however status of these companies as per MCA is "Strike Off Case Law relied upon

SANJEEV KUMAR AGGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 6, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

purchase and sale of gold) of the assessee was utilised for obtaining accommodation entries of bogus long term capital gain in the hands of family members of the assessee and material was confronted to the assessee. Therefore, it is a case of concealment of income under section 271(1)(c) of the 11 ITA.No.2871/Del./2018 Shri Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal

ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S. SPACE AGE RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, MEERUT

In the result Ground No. 1 and 3 of the appeal of the revenue is allowed and ground No

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiacit, Space Age Research & Vs. Circle-2, Meerut Technology Foundation, Charitable Trust, Railway Road, Meerut Pan: Aabts7321M (Appellant) (Respondent)

c) read with section 13(2) has triggered in the case of the assessee. In the result the ground No. 3 of the appeal of the revenue is allowed. 20. Coming to ground No. 2(a) and 2(b) which is against granting of advance to the contractor for the construction of the institute building was considered by the Assessing

PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH PVT. LTD.,,NOIDA vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri I. C. Sudhir & Shri O. P. Kanti.T. Appeal Nos. 5087 To 5091/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 3492 N A N D I.T. Appeal Nos. 5062 To 5066/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 5726 F (Appellants) (Respondents) Assessee By : Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. A.; Department By : Ms. Paramita Tripathy, Cit [Dr]; Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.06.2017 O R D E R Per I. C. Sudhir, J. M. :

C. SUDHIR, J. M. : ITA. Nos.5087 to 5091/Del/2016 – [A.Ys.: 2009-10 to 2013-14] Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt.Ltd. : The assessee has preferred the above appeals against the first appellate orders on following common grounds [except the issue raised in ground No. 3 in the appeals for assessment years 2009-10 and 2011-12] :- “ 1. That on the facts

PANCHSHEEL REALTECH PVT. LTD.,NOIDA vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri I. C. Sudhir & Shri O. P. Kanti.T. Appeal Nos. 5087 To 5091/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 3492 N A N D I.T. Appeal Nos. 5062 To 5066/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 5726 F (Appellants) (Respondents) Assessee By : Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. A.; Department By : Ms. Paramita Tripathy, Cit [Dr]; Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.06.2017 O R D E R Per I. C. Sudhir, J. M. :

C. SUDHIR, J. M. : ITA. Nos.5087 to 5091/Del/2016 – [A.Ys.: 2009-10 to 2013-14] Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt.Ltd. : The assessee has preferred the above appeals against the first appellate orders on following common grounds [except the issue raised in ground No. 3 in the appeals for assessment years 2009-10 and 2011-12] :- “ 1. That on the facts

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

c), as the case may be, of sub-section (1) of section 132A, had been found in the possession or control of that person in the course of a search under section 132.‖ 23. Therefore, in case of the documents found during the course of search in possession of the assessee the presumption lies for all the purposes