BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,196 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 13(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,710Delhi2,196Kolkata658Jaipur580Chennai486Ahmedabad447Surat370Bangalore335Pune294Chandigarh239Hyderabad220Indore189Raipur140Karnataka125Rajkot108Amritsar106Nagpur103Visakhapatnam84Lucknow67Cochin64Cuttack61Guwahati52Calcutta45Agra42Jodhpur41Allahabad35Patna30Ranchi21Telangana15Dehradun14Jabalpur10Varanasi7SC6Panaji5Orissa2Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income76Section 14764Section 153A55Section 143(3)45Section 6845Search & Seizure40Section 13236Section 14834Section 153C31

RICHMOND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. DCIT/ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 4779/DEL/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2026AY 2024-25
For Respondent: \nShri Gaurav Jain, Adv
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

section 13(3) of the Act. Hence, there cannot be any\nallegation that could be leveled on the Assessee society with regard\nto payment of salary to Ms. Jasmine Gandhi without obtaining any\nservices from her.\nB. Cash receipts in lieu of Bogus expenditure / Bogus billing\nDuring the course of search on the Trustee of the Assessee society,\nempty / blank

LAKHMI CHAND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. PCIT CENTRAL 3, NEW DELHI

Showing 1–20 of 2,196 · Page 1 of 110

...
Section 69A27
Disallowance26
Reassessment15
ITA 1803/DEL/2024[-]Status: Disposed
ITAT Delhi
22 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Ms.Madhumita Roylakhmi Chand Vs. Principal Commissioner Charitable Society, Of Income Tax, Central-3 Elephanta Lane, Behind Room No. 325, 3Rd Floor, Sector-10/6 Market, New Income Tax Building, E-3 Golak Dham, Sector-10, Ara Centre, Jhandewalan Dwarka, Extension, New Delhi - 110075 New Delhi - 110055

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr.AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty
Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12(1)Section 127(2)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 246ASection 80G

13(1) cannot be said to be case of application for objects of the trust. Gr. 3.1. Reference made of provisions of sec 12AA without appreciating that said section is not applicable wef. 01.04.2021 (Pg 19-20)  Reference to sec 12AA has only been made since the registration granted earlier was governed by this section. Thus, reference to this section

PANCHSHEEL REALTECH PVT. LTD.,NOIDA vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 5062/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri I. C. Sudhir & Shri O. P. Kanti.T. Appeal Nos. 5087 To 5091/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 3492 N A N D I.T. Appeal Nos. 5062 To 5066/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 5726 F (Appellants) (Respondents) Assessee By : Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. A.; Department By : Ms. Paramita Tripathy, Cit [Dr]; Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.06.2017 O R D E R Per I. C. Sudhir, J. M. :

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. AFor Respondent: Ms. Paramita Tripathy, CIT [DR]
Section 153A

bogus parties, not the entire purchase but only the profit element embedded in such purchases could be added to the income of the assessee. 3. That, as on 13-02-2013, i.e., the date of initiation of the search, there was no “pending” assessment or reassessment, and, as such, in the absence of any incriminating material, the impugned addition made

PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH PVT. LTD.,,NOIDA vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 5087/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri I. C. Sudhir & Shri O. P. Kanti.T. Appeal Nos. 5087 To 5091/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 3492 N A N D I.T. Appeal Nos. 5062 To 5066/Del/2016 Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 Panchsheel Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Dcit, H–169, Sector : 63, Vs. Central Circle, Noida [U.P.] Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaecp 5726 F (Appellants) (Respondents) Assessee By : Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. A.; Department By : Ms. Paramita Tripathy, Cit [Dr]; Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.06.2017 O R D E R Per I. C. Sudhir, J. M. :

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mehra, C. AFor Respondent: Ms. Paramita Tripathy, CIT [DR]
Section 153A

bogus parties, not the entire purchase but only the profit element embedded in such purchases could be added to the income of the assessee. 3. That, as on 13-02-2013, i.e., the date of initiation of the search, there was no “pending” assessment or reassessment, and, as such, in the absence of any incriminating material, the impugned addition made

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1189/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1464/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1465/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1182/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1470/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1181/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1467/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1186/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1469/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1190/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1180/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1466/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1185/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

13. The Explanation to section 37(1) of the Act was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, i.e., inception of the Act. This appears to have been a public policy driven amendment, disallowing deduction benefits in respect of illegal activities which could potentially be brought to tax. The phraseology

ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S. SPACE AGE RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, MEERUT

In the result Ground No. 1 and 3 of the appeal of the revenue is allowed and ground No

ITA 4622/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiacit, Space Age Research & Vs. Circle-2, Meerut Technology Foundation, Charitable Trust, Railway Road, Meerut Pan: Aabts7321M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjeev Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. SS Rana, CIT DR
Section 13(2)Section 13(3)Section 68

Purchases. Perusal of above shows that the assessee has made bogus entries for payment to contractors in his books of account. It is clearly shows that the management of M/s Space Age Research & Charitable Trust, Meerut is siphoning the found of the society by misappropriation of accounts by way of making advance payment under the head of construction of buildings

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9158/DEL/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

1,16,24,050/- on account of disallowance of purchases considering whole purchases amounting Rs. 4,64,96,203/- as bogus purchases whereas per assessee documents in support of genuine purchases has been duly submitted and AO has verified the said parties too and additionally in the alternative the quantum thereof too is being disputed. 12. Because the action

RR CARWELL PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AY

ITA 9156/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Feb 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Gurjeet Singh, C.A. &For Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153A

1,16,24,050/- on account of disallowance of purchases considering whole purchases amounting Rs. 4,64,96,203/- as bogus purchases whereas per assessee documents in support of genuine purchases has been duly submitted and AO has verified the said parties too and additionally in the alternative the quantum thereof too is being disputed. 12. Because the action