BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,133 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 11clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,899Delhi1,133Jaipur326Kolkata283Ahmedabad265Chennai256Bangalore189Chandigarh156Surat155Hyderabad134Indore114Raipur109Rajkot105Pune99Amritsar73Visakhapatnam61Guwahati59Cochin58Lucknow54Nagpur54Agra34Jodhpur33Allahabad33Patna26Cuttack19Ranchi14Dehradun13Jabalpur8Varanasi7Panaji3

Key Topics

Addition to Income78Section 14757Section 14856Section 6847Section 143(3)44Section 153A44Section 13233Section 153C28Section 26325Disallowance

PARMANAND & SONS FOOD PRODUCT PVT. LTD, ,DELHI vs. DCIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-20

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 981/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

PARMANAND & SONS FOOD PRODUCT PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-20

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 980/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi

Showing 1–20 of 1,133 · Page 1 of 57

...
22
Search & Seizure21
Reassessment20
30 May 2024
AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 942/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT,CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 940/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARAMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 932/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL , DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 944/DEL/2022[2017--18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL , DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 941/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT,CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 943/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, CC-20 , NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT.LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 939/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1330/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1329/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARAMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 931/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGRO FOODS PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 2420/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGRO FOODS PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 2419/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-20 , DELHI vs. KWALITY TECHMECH PVT. LTD. , DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 937/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1855/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 934/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 933/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1854/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account

KWALITY TECHMECH P.LTD,DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 711/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

11. Thus, the critical point was while the AO himself considered 25% of the total purchases as bogus, the ld. CIT(A) determined profit @ 5.67% on the unsubstantiated purchases. 12. Aggrieved, both the assessee and the revenue are in appeal before us. The Revenue is in appeal against deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account