BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

729 results for “bogus purchases”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,969Delhi729Jaipur286Ahmedabad273Chennai151Kolkata143Pune125Karnataka105Hyderabad102Bangalore100Surat95Chandigarh76Indore73Rajkot59Raipur43Calcutta35Nagpur31Amritsar31Lucknow24Guwahati22Allahabad20Patna15Jodhpur13Visakhapatnam11Cuttack10Agra10Telangana5Dehradun5Ranchi4SC3Cochin3Jabalpur2Panaji1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Gauhati1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Addition to Income62Section 271(1)(c)46Section 6839Section 143(3)35Penalty29Disallowance25Section 153A24Section 143(2)21Section 14720Section 142(1)

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1470/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 729 · Page 1 of 37

...
15
Bogus Purchases15
Section 14813
ITA 1465/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1180/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1189/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1464/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1466/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1181/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1469/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI vs. GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1467/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1182/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1186/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1190/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

GD FOODS MANUFACTURING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 26, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1185/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K. N. Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

bogus purchases are made, cannot be ignored when same are interlinked, correlated and reconciled. We do not find any reason that when certain documents found from the hard disk are considered by the assessing officer for enhancing the income of the assessee, what could be the reason for ignoring other excels sheets found from the same hard disk

JUDGEMENTopens in new window

ITA/71/2021HC Delhi19 Jan 2022
Section 260A

bogus sales or purchases, that had been routed back to the assessee in the form of share capital/share premium, albeit, through banking channels. 10.4. The Tribunal, in this context, records a finding of fact that ―no unaccounted income of the assessee‖ had been introduced in its books of accounts in the form of share capital. Based on this, the Tribunal

JUDGEMENTopens in new window

ITA/68/2021HC Delhi19 Jan 2022
Section 260A

bogus sales or purchases, that had been routed back to the assessee in the form of share capital/share premium, albeit, through banking channels. 10.4. The Tribunal, in this context, records a finding of fact that ―no unaccounted income of the assessee‖ had been introduced in its books of accounts in the form of share capital. Based on this, the Tribunal

JUDGEMENTopens in new window

ITA/69/2021HC Delhi19 Jan 2022
Section 260A

bogus sales or purchases, that had been routed back to the assessee in the form of share capital/share premium, albeit, through banking channels. 10.4. The Tribunal, in this context, records a finding of fact that ―no unaccounted income of the assessee‖ had been introduced in its books of accounts in the form of share capital. Based on this, the Tribunal

JUDGEMENTopens in new window

ITA/73/2021HC Delhi19 Jan 2022
Section 260A

bogus sales or purchases, that had been routed back to the assessee in the form of share capital/share premium, albeit, through banking channels. 10.4. The Tribunal, in this context, records a finding of fact that ―no unaccounted income of the assessee‖ had been introduced in its books of accounts in the form of share capital. Based on this, the Tribunal

M/S VARDAAN FASHION,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 3 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1143/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jul 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: I.C.Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishivardan Fashions, Jcit, E-1/7, 2Nd Floor, East Patel Range-33, Vs. Nagar, New Delhi New Delhi Pan:Aacfv0423H (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vardan Fashions, Circle-33(1) E-1/7, 2Nd Floor, East Patel Vs. New Delhi Nagar, New Delhi Pan:Aacfv0423H (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Vijay Verma, CIT DR
Section 142Section 40

bogus bills and also applicant's own admission in the SOP about the suspicious nature of purchases, we are of the opinion that the Books of Accounts of both the applicants are unreliable and accordingly declared trading results are rejected in all respects as not showing the correct state of affairs of the businesses of the applicants except the export

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S VARDAN FASHION, NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 3 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 950/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jul 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: I.C.Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishivardan Fashions, Jcit, E-1/7, 2Nd Floor, East Patel Range-33, Vs. Nagar, New Delhi New Delhi Pan:Aacfv0423H (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vardan Fashions, Circle-33(1) E-1/7, 2Nd Floor, East Patel Vs. New Delhi Nagar, New Delhi Pan:Aacfv0423H (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Vijay Verma, CIT DR
Section 142Section 40

bogus bills and also applicant's own admission in the SOP about the suspicious nature of purchases, we are of the opinion that the Books of Accounts of both the applicants are unreliable and accordingly declared trading results are rejected in all respects as not showing the correct state of affairs of the businesses of the applicants except the export

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL LUDHIANA vs. M/S. GARG ACRYLICS LTD

ITA/178/2023HC Delhi22 May 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

For Appellant: Mr.Debesh Panda, SSCFor Respondent: Mr.Rohit Jain, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 260ASection 68

bogus sales and purchase, accordingly, the whole difference of Rs.20,24,39,341/- is being treated as undisclosed income of the assessee and the same is hereby added back in the income of the assessee. Since, I am satisfied that the assessee has concealed its income by furnishing inaccurate particulars of its income, therefore, penalty