BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 80lclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai3Delhi2Mumbai2

Key Topics

Section 2715Section 143(3)3Section 271(1)(c)3Section 2632TDS2Addition to Income2

ITO, GURGAON vs. SH. RAKESH KUMAR SAINI, GURGAON

In the result, the Revenue’s Appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1686/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 May 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi, Accountant Ember Assessment Year: 2008-09

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Gotru, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

80L, housing loan certificate, secured loan proof, reasons for low GP, the non-deduction of tax, date-wise capital account and to give an explanation regarding non-declaration of receipts from Jindal Mectec and M/s Timplex Industries. For filing voluminous details, the appellant was given 8 only one day and the case was adjourned to 29.12.2010. There is no record

SUSHIL KUMAR BHATI,FARIDABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 2(4), FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2819/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambledr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 2819/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Sushil Kumar Bhati, Vs Income Tax Officer, H.No. 591, Sector-21B, Ward-2(4), Faridabad, Haryana Faridabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Ahfpb0420P Assessee By : Ms. Vanshika Taneja, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.02.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 08.05.2020

For Appellant: Ms. Vanshika Taneja, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 17(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 27(1)(c)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

section u/s 271 of the Act was issued to the assessee on 18-10-2016. In response to the said notice, the assessee filed reply dated 20-10-2016 which is reproduced as under: “The fact of the additional income of Rs.14,61,332/- in our submission includes as follows: ESOP- Salary from PEL Rs.9,43,230.00 Salary difference