BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,757 results for “TDS”+ Section 44clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,818Delhi1,757Bangalore953Chennai595Kolkata357Hyderabad221Ahmedabad215Indore186Jaipur166Cochin161Chandigarh151Karnataka150Raipur110Pune87Surat53Lucknow52Visakhapatnam51Cuttack41Rajkot39Guwahati28Nagpur27Patna24Ranchi23Agra18Dehradun17Jodhpur17Telangana17Amritsar15Kerala7SC7Himachal Pradesh6Jabalpur6Panaji5Varanasi4Uttarakhand3Rajasthan2Calcutta1J&K1

Key Topics

Addition to Income55Section 143(3)40Disallowance32Section 4031Deduction29Double Taxation/DTAA26Section 14A22TDS22Section 44D18Section 43B

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I vs. PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/403/2013HC Delhi28 Sept 2015
Section 194Section 201Section 44Section 44BSection 80H

44 BB (1). The service tax is not an amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The Assessee is only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the government. 18. The Court further notes that the position has been made explicit by the CBDT itself

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I vs. PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/384/2015HC Delhi

Showing 1–20 of 1,757 · Page 1 of 88

...
16
Section 6814
Section 143(1)13
28 Sept 2015
Section 194Section 201Section 44Section 44BSection 80H

44 BB (1). The service tax is not an amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The Assessee is only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the government. 18. The Court further notes that the position has been made explicit by the CBDT itself

W SERVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1040/DEL/2020[2013-14 (26Q-Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS authorities and upheld by Ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, the appellants are in appeal before Hon’ble Tribunal. On this issue Hon’ble ITAT has passed a combined order dt. 29.11.2019 read with corrigendum dt. 11.12.2019 in 3 ITAs [ITA No. 5380/Del/2017, AY 2016-17; No. 5989/Del/2017, AY 2013-14 & 5990/Del/2017, AY 2013-14] with lead case being

W SERVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1027/DEL/2020[2015-16 24Q, (Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS authorities and upheld by Ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, the appellants are in appeal before Hon’ble Tribunal. On this issue Hon’ble ITAT has passed a combined order dt. 29.11.2019 read with corrigendum dt. 11.12.2019 in 3 ITAs [ITA No. 5380/Del/2017, AY 2016-17; No. 5989/Del/2017, AY 2013-14 & 5990/Del/2017, AY 2013-14] with lead case being

ORAVEL STAYS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ORAVEL STAYS PRIVATE LIMITED),GURUGRAM vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 6, NEW DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

ITA 577/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 194Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40

44,061/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act will be justified otherwise not. 22. At the outset, the Ld. Sr. Counsel drew our attention to the Tribunal decision in the assessee’s own case in ITA No. 6370/Del/2019 AY 2015-16; wherein it had been held that the provisions of section 194C of the Act were not attracted

ORAVEL STAYS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ORAVEL STAYS PRIVATE LIMITED),GURUGRAM vs. DCIT CIRCLE 76(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

ITA 452/DEL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 194Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40

44,061/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act will be justified otherwise not. 22. At the outset, the Ld. Sr. Counsel drew our attention to the Tribunal decision in the assessee’s own case in ITA No. 6370/Del/2019 AY 2015-16; wherein it had been held that the provisions of section 194C of the Act were not attracted

SUMITA SINGHAL,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-17(4), NEW DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

ITA 577/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 194Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40

44,061/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act will be justified otherwise not. 22. At the outset, the Ld. Sr. Counsel drew our attention to the Tribunal decision in the assessee’s own case in ITA No. 6370/Del/2019 AY 2015-16; wherein it had been held that the provisions of section 194C of the Act were not attracted

R V INTERIOR PVT. LTD. ,DELHI vs. PCIT, DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

ITA 452/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 194Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40

44,061/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act will be justified otherwise not. 22. At the outset, the Ld. Sr. Counsel drew our attention to the Tribunal decision in the assessee’s own case in ITA No. 6370/Del/2019 AY 2015-16; wherein it had been held that the provisions of section 194C of the Act were not attracted

SERCO INDIA PVT. LTD.,PUNE vs. DCIT, GURGAON

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 1432/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shrianil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri N. K. Choudhry, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, Ld. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 92C

TDS under section 192 of the Act, hence, cannot be treated as FTS under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act and Article 12 of the tax treaty. Accordingly, there was no obligation on the part of the Assessee to withhold tax at source under section 195 of the Act. Resultantly, we delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer

JCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. R & B FALCON (A) PTY LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, all these appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 708/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: : Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahuassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 44B

44 BB (1). The service tax is not an amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The Assessee is only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the government. 18. The Court further notes that the position has been made explicit by the CBDT itself

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. R & B FALCON (A) PTY LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Department is partly allowed

ITA 1048/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaay: 2010-11 Adit Vs R & B Falcon (A) Pty Ltd., International Taxation, 1St Floor, Spectra High Street, Aayakar Bhawan, Hiranandani Business Park, 13A-Subhash Road, Powai, Mumbai. Dehraun. (Pan: Aaccr5345Q) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Anuj Arora, Cit Dr Respondent By: Shri Amit Arora, Ca Date Of Hearing: 08.02.2016 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.04.2016

For Appellant: Shri Anuj Arora, CIT DRFor Respondent: Shri Amit Arora, CA
Section 234BSection 44B

44 BB (1). The service tax is not an amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The Assessee is only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the government. 18. The Court further notes that the position has been made explicit by the CBDT itself

M/S. SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed whereas the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4468/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhu & Sh. N. K. Billaiya

Section 1Section 115Section 250(6)Section 44Section 44BSection 9

44 BB (1). The service tax is not and amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the Government. 18. The Court further notes that the position has been made explicit by the CBDT itselfin

M/S. SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed whereas the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4467/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhu & Sh. N. K. Billaiya

Section 1Section 115Section 250(6)Section 44Section 44BSection 9

44 BB (1). The service tax is not and amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the Government. 18. The Court further notes that the position has been made explicit by the CBDT itselfin

EBNOY HOMES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 74(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1101/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234Section 234ESection 271Section 271H

TDS return u/s.200A to levy late fee u/s. 234 E for the period prior to 01.06.2015. 2.1 The ld. DR, on the other hand, strongly supported the order of the CIT(A). She submitted that the common issue in all these appeals under consideration is levy of fees u/s 234E of the Act. She submitted that the contention

DRAIPL-BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (JV),NEW DELHI vs. TDS, CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6709/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS CPC Pvt. Ltd. Ghaziabad – 211010 A-7, Mahipalpur, Brahmaputra House, New Delhi-110037 Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by None Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, SR. DR Date of hearing : 25.08.2020 Date of order : 31.08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of appeals filed by the respective assessees are directed against the separate orders of the CIT(A) dated

SUPREME BRAHMAPUTRA (JV),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - CPC - TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6706/DEL/2019[2013-14 (26Q, Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS CPC Pvt. Ltd. Ghaziabad – 211010 A-7, Mahipalpur, Brahmaputra House, New Delhi-110037 Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by None Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, SR. DR Date of hearing : 25.08.2020 Date of order : 31.08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of appeals filed by the respective assessees are directed against the separate orders of the CIT(A) dated

BRAHMAPUTRA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. TDS, CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6718/DEL/2019[2013-14,26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS CPC Pvt. Ltd. Ghaziabad – 211010 A-7, Mahipalpur, Brahmaputra House, New Delhi-110037 Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by None Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, SR. DR Date of hearing : 25.08.2020 Date of order : 31.08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of appeals filed by the respective assessees are directed against the separate orders of the CIT(A) dated

FRANCHISE INDIA BRANDS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. CPC- TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1274/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS Aayakar Bhawan Sector-3, F-89/11, Okhla Industrial Area, Vaishali, Ghaziabad – 201010 Phase-I, Near ESI Hospital Uttar Pradesh New Delhi-110020 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Vijay Jindal, CA Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, SR. DR Date of hearing 26.08.2020 Date of pronouncement .08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of three appeals filed

BATHLINE INDIA (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 9336/DEL/2019[2013-14 (24Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 54

TDS Vaishali A-232, Okhla Industrial Area, Ghaziabad – 201010 Uttar Phase-I, Tekhand, South East, Pradesh New Delhi-110020 PAN No. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, CA Respondent by Sh. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 28.08.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 31.08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of six appeals filed by the assessee are directed

BATHLINE INDIA (PVT.) LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 9341/DEL/2019[2013-14 (26Q,Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 54

TDS Vaishali A-232, Okhla Industrial Area, Ghaziabad – 201010 Uttar Phase-I, Tekhand, South East, Pradesh New Delhi-110020 PAN No. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, CA Respondent by Sh. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 28.08.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 31.08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of six appeals filed by the assessee are directed