BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,336 results for “TDS”+ Section 35clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,336Mumbai2,133Bangalore1,267Chennai715Kolkata463Hyderabad344Raipur326Ahmedabad299Indore230Jaipur228Chandigarh208Cochin193Karnataka169Pune159Surat85Visakhapatnam72Rajkot72Lucknow69Dehradun55Cuttack54Nagpur40Ranchi36Jabalpur34Guwahati31Jodhpur26Patna23Agra20Allahabad19Amritsar18Panaji17Telangana14SC12Varanasi11Kerala9Calcutta3Uttarakhand2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Addition to Income55Section 143(3)47Disallowance41Section 26334Deduction30TDS27Section 4021Section 14A19Natural Justice18Section 144C

HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms, but in the circumstances, with

ITA/194/2004HC Delhi01 Aug 2016

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271

TDS under Section 194-I of the Act. 35. The facts remains that at the stage when the TDS had to be deducted

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6312/DEL/2019[2014-15 Qtr 24(Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi

Showing 1–20 of 2,336 · Page 1 of 117

...
16
Double Taxation/DTAA16
Section 13215
31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6327/DEL/2019[2015-16 Qtr 26 (Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6326/DEL/2019[2013-14 ,26(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6325/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26(Q-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6324/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26(Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6323/DEL/2019[2014-15, 26(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6322/DEL/2019[2014-15, 26(Q-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6321/DEL/2019[2014-15, 26(Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6320/DEL/2019[2014-15 ,26 (Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6319/DEL/2019[2015-16 Qtr 24(Q-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6318/DEL/2019[2015-16 Qtr - 24(Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6317/DEL/2019[2015-16 Qtr 24(Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6316/DEL/2019[2014-15 Qtr 24 (Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6315/DEL/2019[2014-15(Qtr - 24 (Q-3))]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6314/DEL/2019[2014-15 Otr - 24 (Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6311/DEL/2019[2013-14 Qtr - 24(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6310/DEL/2019[2013-14 (Qtr - 24(Q-3))]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6309/DEL/2019[2013-14 (Otr-24(Q-2))]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section

AVV ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 654/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

35,00,000/-, the assessee' contention has been that it was not required to deduct TDS, because the payments made to each seller was less than the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lacs and therefore, provision of section