ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. HAL OFFSHORE LTD., NEW DELHI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 4673/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Jul 2019AY 2012-13
Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4673/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Acit, Vs M/S Hal Offshore Ltd., Central Circle-15, 25, Bazar Lane, Bengali Market, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaach3144B Ita No. 2081/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 M/S Hal Offshore Ltd., Vs Dcit, C/O M/S Rra Taxindia, Circle-12(1), D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi New Delhi-110049 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaach3144B Assessee By : Sh. Somil Agarwal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 23.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar:
For Appellant: Sh. Somil Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 41(1)
TDS is deductible on this amount. Regarding the DPS Offshore and Fugro Seastar
AS, it was submitted that the assessee has hired trans receiver which is a part of acoustic tracking system, global positioning system installed on the vessel. It was argued placed on the judgment on ONGC Vs CIT 376 ITR
036 that these are ancillary works related