BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

221 results for “TDS”+ Section 272A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune325Delhi221Mumbai125Chennai88Bangalore71Visakhapatnam56Karnataka26Nagpur25Kolkata23Ahmedabad20Lucknow18Panaji15Indore12Cochin12Surat11Raipur10Hyderabad9Agra8Varanasi6Chandigarh6Jaipur4Rajkot4Patna3Jodhpur2Cuttack2Allahabad1Jabalpur1Guwahati1SC1Amritsar1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 234E439Section 200A169Section 154126TDS97Section 200A(1)78Rectification u/s 15460Section 200A(1)(c)55Section 200A(3)51Penalty31Section 201(1)

VARDHMAN INFRA DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-78(3), NEW DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 511/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No.511/Del./2024, A.Y. 2014-15 Vardhman Infra Developers Income Tax Officer, (P) Ltd., 401-414, C-58, Ward-78(3), 4Th Floor, Shahpuri, Vs. Income Tax Office, Tirath Singh, Tower Dda, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi Janakpuri, New Delhi Pan: Aadcv3838M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By None Respondent By Shri Om Prakash, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 30/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/07/2025 Order Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am The Appeal For The Assessment Year (‘Ay’) 2014-15 Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 18.03.2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-28, New Delhi [‘Cit(A)’].

Section 201Section 203Section 272A(2)(g)Section 273Section 276BSection 279(2)

section 272A(2)(g) of the Act. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the penalty rejecting the contention of the appellant that delay in issuance of TDS

Showing 1–20 of 221 · Page 1 of 12

...
26
Section 272A(2)(k)24
Deduction19

DAR LANDMARKS P.LTD,NOID vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 201/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

SIPL TEXTILES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 77(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 5054/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

SIPL TEXTILES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 77(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 5053/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

INFANT JESUS SCHOOL,MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. ACIT, TDS(CPC), MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 3984/DEL/2018[2014-15 (2ND QTR.)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

INFANT JESUS SCHOOL,MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. ACIT, TDS(CPC), MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 3985/DEL/2018[2014-15 (3RD QTR.)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

INFANT JESUS SCHOOL,MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. ACIT, TDS(CPC), MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 3983/DEL/2018[2014-15 (1ST QTR.)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

SIPL TEXTILES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 77(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 5055/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

INFANT JESUS SCHOOL,MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. ACIT, TDS(CPC), MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 3986/DEL/2018[2014-15 (4TH QTR.)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

SIPL TEXTILES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-77(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 5053/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6309/DEL/2019[2013-14 (Otr-24(Q-2))]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6310/DEL/2019[2013-14 (Qtr - 24(Q-3))]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6311/DEL/2019[2013-14 Qtr - 24(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6314/DEL/2019[2014-15 Otr - 24 (Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6312/DEL/2019[2014-15 Qtr 24(Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6315/DEL/2019[2014-15(Qtr - 24 (Q-3))]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

S vs. GUARDING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHIVS.ITO, TDS, WARD- 77(3), NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 647/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6316/DEL/2019[2014-15 Qtr 24 (Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

AVV ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 654/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6317/DEL/2019[2015-16 Qtr 24(Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned