BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

41 results for “TDS”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi41Mumbai22Bangalore11Amritsar6Indore6Jaipur6Lucknow5Ahmedabad4Hyderabad4Pune3Jodhpur1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 15448Section 275(1)(c)46Section 271D35Penalty31Addition to Income31Section 271E26Section 269S26Section 271C26Limitation/Time-bar21Section 143(3)

VISHWANATH AGGARWAL,DELHI vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE-05, DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the penalty is deleted

ITA 617/DEL/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.611 To 618/Del/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2011-12,2013-14, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Vishwanath Aggarwal, Vs Addl. Cit, House No.98, Block C-2, Range-05, Janakpuri, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 058. Pan: Abxpa4825B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : .07.2024 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. First Appellate Authority Or ‘The Ld. Faa’ For Short) In Appeals Filed Before Him Against The Penalty Orders Of The Ld. Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao, For Short). Further Details Of The Penalty Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132ASection 153ASection 269SSection 271DSection 271E

Showing 1–20 of 41 · Page 1 of 3

19
TDS19
Section 201(1)17

269T in the assessment order itself. The assessment order u/s 153A of the IT Act is approved by Range Head u/s ITAs No.611 to 618/Del/2022 153D of the Act and a reference u/s 271D & 271E of the Act is made as part of the order. 7. Further, it is submitted that vide the said Para 4 of the Circular

VISHWANATH AGGARWAL,DELHI vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE-05, DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the penalty is deleted

ITA 615/DEL/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.611 To 618/Del/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2011-12,2013-14, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Vishwanath Aggarwal, Vs Addl. Cit, House No.98, Block C-2, Range-05, Janakpuri, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 058. Pan: Abxpa4825B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : .07.2024 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. First Appellate Authority Or ‘The Ld. Faa’ For Short) In Appeals Filed Before Him Against The Penalty Orders Of The Ld. Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao, For Short). Further Details Of The Penalty Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132ASection 153ASection 269SSection 271DSection 271E

269T in the assessment order itself. The assessment order u/s 153A of the IT Act is approved by Range Head u/s ITAs No.611 to 618/Del/2022 153D of the Act and a reference u/s 271D & 271E of the Act is made as part of the order. 7. Further, it is submitted that vide the said Para 4 of the Circular

VISHWANATH AGGARWAL,DELHI vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE-05, DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the penalty is deleted

ITA 614/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.611 To 618/Del/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2011-12,2013-14, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Vishwanath Aggarwal, Vs Addl. Cit, House No.98, Block C-2, Range-05, Janakpuri, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 058. Pan: Abxpa4825B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : .07.2024 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. First Appellate Authority Or ‘The Ld. Faa’ For Short) In Appeals Filed Before Him Against The Penalty Orders Of The Ld. Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao, For Short). Further Details Of The Penalty Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132ASection 153ASection 269SSection 271DSection 271E

269T in the assessment order itself. The assessment order u/s 153A of the IT Act is approved by Range Head u/s ITAs No.611 to 618/Del/2022 153D of the Act and a reference u/s 271D & 271E of the Act is made as part of the order. 7. Further, it is submitted that vide the said Para 4 of the Circular

VISHWANATH AGGARWAL,DELHI vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE-05, DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the penalty is deleted

ITA 613/DEL/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.611 To 618/Del/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2011-12,2013-14, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Vishwanath Aggarwal, Vs Addl. Cit, House No.98, Block C-2, Range-05, Janakpuri, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 058. Pan: Abxpa4825B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : .07.2024 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. First Appellate Authority Or ‘The Ld. Faa’ For Short) In Appeals Filed Before Him Against The Penalty Orders Of The Ld. Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao, For Short). Further Details Of The Penalty Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132ASection 153ASection 269SSection 271DSection 271E

269T in the assessment order itself. The assessment order u/s 153A of the IT Act is approved by Range Head u/s ITAs No.611 to 618/Del/2022 153D of the Act and a reference u/s 271D & 271E of the Act is made as part of the order. 7. Further, it is submitted that vide the said Para 4 of the Circular

VISHWANATH AGGARWAL ,DELHI vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE-05, DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the penalty is deleted

ITA 616/DEL/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.611 To 618/Del/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2011-12,2013-14, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Vishwanath Aggarwal, Vs Addl. Cit, House No.98, Block C-2, Range-05, Janakpuri, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 058. Pan: Abxpa4825B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : .07.2024 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. First Appellate Authority Or ‘The Ld. Faa’ For Short) In Appeals Filed Before Him Against The Penalty Orders Of The Ld. Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao, For Short). Further Details Of The Penalty Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132ASection 153ASection 269SSection 271DSection 271E

269T in the assessment order itself. The assessment order u/s 153A of the IT Act is approved by Range Head u/s ITAs No.611 to 618/Del/2022 153D of the Act and a reference u/s 271D & 271E of the Act is made as part of the order. 7. Further, it is submitted that vide the said Para 4 of the Circular

VISHWANATH AGGARWAL,DELHI vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE-05, DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the penalty is deleted

ITA 618/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.611 To 618/Del/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2011-12,2013-14, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Vishwanath Aggarwal, Vs Addl. Cit, House No.98, Block C-2, Range-05, Janakpuri, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 058. Pan: Abxpa4825B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : .07.2024 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. First Appellate Authority Or ‘The Ld. Faa’ For Short) In Appeals Filed Before Him Against The Penalty Orders Of The Ld. Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao, For Short). Further Details Of The Penalty Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132ASection 153ASection 269SSection 271DSection 271E

269T in the assessment order itself. The assessment order u/s 153A of the IT Act is approved by Range Head u/s ITAs No.611 to 618/Del/2022 153D of the Act and a reference u/s 271D & 271E of the Act is made as part of the order. 7. Further, it is submitted that vide the said Para 4 of the Circular

VISHWANATH AGGARWAL ,DELHI vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE-05, DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the penalty is deleted

ITA 611/DEL/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.611 To 618/Del/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2011-12,2013-14, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Vishwanath Aggarwal, Vs Addl. Cit, House No.98, Block C-2, Range-05, Janakpuri, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 058. Pan: Abxpa4825B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : .07.2024 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. First Appellate Authority Or ‘The Ld. Faa’ For Short) In Appeals Filed Before Him Against The Penalty Orders Of The Ld. Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao, For Short). Further Details Of The Penalty Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132ASection 153ASection 269SSection 271DSection 271E

269T in the assessment order itself. The assessment order u/s 153A of the IT Act is approved by Range Head u/s ITAs No.611 to 618/Del/2022 153D of the Act and a reference u/s 271D & 271E of the Act is made as part of the order. 7. Further, it is submitted that vide the said Para 4 of the Circular

VISHWANATH AGGARWAL,DELHI vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE-05, DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the penalty is deleted

ITA 612/DEL/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharmaitas No.611 To 618/Del/2022 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2011-12,2013-14, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Vishwanath Aggarwal, Vs Addl. Cit, House No.98, Block C-2, Range-05, Janakpuri, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 058. Pan: Abxpa4825B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : .07.2024 Order Per Anubhav Sharma, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. First Appellate Authority Or ‘The Ld. Faa’ For Short) In Appeals Filed Before Him Against The Penalty Orders Of The Ld. Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Ao, For Short). Further Details Of The Penalty Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132ASection 153ASection 269SSection 271DSection 271E

269T in the assessment order itself. The assessment order u/s 153A of the IT Act is approved by Range Head u/s ITAs No.611 to 618/Del/2022 153D of the Act and a reference u/s 271D & 271E of the Act is made as part of the order. 7. Further, it is submitted that vide the said Para 4 of the Circular

SUMIT JUNEJA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 62(5), NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 5802/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 269TSection 271ESection 40A(3)Section 44A

section 269T of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are based on conjecture, personal surmise and purely on adhoc basis. The accounts of the assessee were duly audited by the chartered accountant 2 as per the requirement of the Act and the payments made to Smt. Sugandha Juneja was for medical purpose, to Sh. Deepak was due to some personal reasons

DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE - 7(2), NEW DELHI

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1495/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Satyajeet Goel, CAFor Respondent: Shri T. James Singson, CIT- DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145(2)Section 147Section 148

TDS certificates issued by the tenant. 15. Names/Addresses./Amounts of all Sundry Creditors/Advances from Customers and Sundry Debtors exceeding Rs. 1 lac. 16. Details & Copies of accounts of Other Liabilities as shown in the Balance Sheet and necessary evidence in support of the payments thereof. 17. Details & Copies of accounts of Expenses payable as shown in the Balance Sheet

M/S MODIPON LTD.,,MODINAGAR vs. ADDL. (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result the ground No

ITA 2276/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu

For Appellant: Shri Santosh Agarwal, Adv
Section 201(1)Section 246Section 246ASection 253Section 271CSection 272A(2)(k)Section 275

269T and if so, initiate penalty proceedings under section 271D or 271E and thereafter refer the matter to the Joint Commissioner who would finally decide and if satisfied, levy the penalty under section 271D or 271E. Hence the period of limitation was to be counted from the date of the initiation of the penalty proceedings by the Assessing Officer, that

M/S MODIPON LTD.,,MODINAGAR vs. ADDL. (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result the ground No

ITA 2275/DEL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu

For Appellant: Shri Santosh Agarwal, Adv
Section 201(1)Section 246Section 246ASection 253Section 271CSection 272A(2)(k)Section 275

269T and if so, initiate penalty proceedings under section 271D or 271E and thereafter refer the matter to the Joint Commissioner who would finally decide and if satisfied, levy the penalty under section 271D or 271E. Hence the period of limitation was to be counted from the date of the initiation of the penalty proceedings by the Assessing Officer, that

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1979/DEL/2012[2008-09 (F.Y. 2007-08)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1978/DEL/2012[2007-08 (F.Y. 2006-07)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 828/DEL/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 827/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 829/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1897/DEL/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

SANJEEV JAI NARAIN AEREN,DELHI vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE - 04,, DELHI

Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee arising out of penalty u/s 271D for AYs 2015-16 & 2018-19 are allowed

ITA 2925/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rajeshwar Prasad Painuly, CAFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271DSection 271ESection 274(2)Section 275(1)(c)Section 27l

269T were initiated and completed on 29.12.2022. The relevant quantum appeals for AY 2015-16, 2017-18 and 2018-19 are pending before ld. CIT (A)-26 and no quantum appeal was pending before first appellate authority for AY 2016-17. The issue raised by the assessee in appeals before us are, the assessment was completed on 29.12.2022 and Addl

SANJEEV JAI NARAIN AEREN,DELHI vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL RANGE-4,, DELHI

Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee arising out of penalty u/s 271D for AYs 2015-16 & 2018-19 are allowed

ITA 2924/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rajeshwar Prasad Painuly, CAFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271DSection 271ESection 274(2)Section 275(1)(c)Section 27l

269T were initiated and completed on 29.12.2022. The relevant quantum appeals for AY 2015-16, 2017-18 and 2018-19 are pending before ld. CIT (A)-26 and no quantum appeal was pending before first appellate authority for AY 2016-17. The issue raised by the assessee in appeals before us are, the assessment was completed on 29.12.2022 and Addl