BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

173 results for “TDS”+ Section 246clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai313Delhi173Karnataka103Bangalore82Chennai48Kolkata46Hyderabad28Jaipur27Pune27Indore21Raipur19Lucknow18Chandigarh16Nagpur13Visakhapatnam9Ahmedabad9Cuttack7Surat6Cochin6Rajkot5Agra4Varanasi4Jodhpur2Amritsar2SC1Patna1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 6878Section 143(3)56Addition to Income52Section 14733Section 14831Disallowance31TDS30Section 11526Section 3721Penalty

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORP. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and COs of the assessee are allowed

ITA 686/LKW/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jun 2020AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS in such circumstances. 18. He therefore submitted that the learned CIT – A has correctly deleted the demand raised under section 201 (1) and interest under section 201 (1A) of The Income Tax Act and consequent penalty under section 271C of the act. 19. On the issue of levy of penalty under section 271C of the act, he submitted that

Showing 1–20 of 173 · Page 1 of 9

...
20
Section 20119
Section 201(1)19

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORP. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and COs of the assessee are allowed

ITA 685/LKW/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jun 2020AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS in such circumstances. 18. He therefore submitted that the learned CIT – A has correctly deleted the demand raised under section 201 (1) and interest under section 201 (1A) of The Income Tax Act and consequent penalty under section 271C of the act. 19. On the issue of levy of penalty under section 271C of the act, he submitted that

SHARDA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NOIDA

In the result, ITA.No.3377/Del

ITA 3381/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Anupma Anand, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 133ASection 195Section 201(1)

TDS 46,96,182/- Interest 19,24,001/- Grand Total 66,20,183/- 7.2. So far as Commission on Student Recruitment/ Admission is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the 31 ITA.No.3377 to 3383/Del./2018 M/s. Sharda Educational Trust, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Assessee submitted that the MOU entered into with the various parties in different countries contains standard terms

SHARDA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NOIDA

In the result, ITA.No.3377/Del

ITA 3379/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Anupma Anand, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 133ASection 195Section 201(1)

TDS 46,96,182/- Interest 19,24,001/- Grand Total 66,20,183/- 7.2. So far as Commission on Student Recruitment/ Admission is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the 31 ITA.No.3377 to 3383/Del./2018 M/s. Sharda Educational Trust, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Assessee submitted that the MOU entered into with the various parties in different countries contains standard terms

SHARDA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NOIDA

In the result, ITA.No.3377/Del

ITA 3380/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Anupma Anand, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 133ASection 195Section 201(1)

TDS 46,96,182/- Interest 19,24,001/- Grand Total 66,20,183/- 7.2. So far as Commission on Student Recruitment/ Admission is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the 31 ITA.No.3377 to 3383/Del./2018 M/s. Sharda Educational Trust, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Assessee submitted that the MOU entered into with the various parties in different countries contains standard terms

SHARDA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NOIDA

In the result, ITA.No.3377/Del

ITA 3383/DEL/2018[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Anupma Anand, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 133ASection 195Section 201(1)

TDS 46,96,182/- Interest 19,24,001/- Grand Total 66,20,183/- 7.2. So far as Commission on Student Recruitment/ Admission is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the 31 ITA.No.3377 to 3383/Del./2018 M/s. Sharda Educational Trust, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Assessee submitted that the MOU entered into with the various parties in different countries contains standard terms

SHARDA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NOIDA

In the result, ITA.No.3377/Del

ITA 3378/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Anupma Anand, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 133ASection 195Section 201(1)

TDS 46,96,182/- Interest 19,24,001/- Grand Total 66,20,183/- 7.2. So far as Commission on Student Recruitment/ Admission is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the 31 ITA.No.3377 to 3383/Del./2018 M/s. Sharda Educational Trust, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Assessee submitted that the MOU entered into with the various parties in different countries contains standard terms

SHARDA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NOIDA

In the result, ITA.No.3377/Del

ITA 3377/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Anupma Anand, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 133ASection 195Section 201(1)

TDS 46,96,182/- Interest 19,24,001/- Grand Total 66,20,183/- 7.2. So far as Commission on Student Recruitment/ Admission is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the 31 ITA.No.3377 to 3383/Del./2018 M/s. Sharda Educational Trust, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Assessee submitted that the MOU entered into with the various parties in different countries contains standard terms

SHARDA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,GREATER NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NOIDA

In the result, ITA.No.3377/Del

ITA 3382/DEL/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Anupma Anand, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 133ASection 195Section 201(1)

TDS 46,96,182/- Interest 19,24,001/- Grand Total 66,20,183/- 7.2. So far as Commission on Student Recruitment/ Admission is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the 31 ITA.No.3377 to 3383/Del./2018 M/s. Sharda Educational Trust, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Assessee submitted that the MOU entered into with the various parties in different countries contains standard terms

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S AGILUS DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED, GURGAON

ITA 2836/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwaldcit, Vs. M/S Agilus Diagnostics Circle-73(1), Room Ltd, No.413, 4Th Floor, Aayakar 306, Tower A, Unitech Bhawa, Laxmi Nagar, Cyber Park, Sector 39, Delhi Gurugram 122002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aaacs 2809 J Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Devashish Jain, Adv &For Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr
Section 192Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 246(2)Section 250

246(2) of the IT Act, who thereafter passed an Order dated 18.02.2025 (Impugned Order) under Section 250 of the IT Act. The Ld. CIT(A), after considering the Respondent's contractual arrangement with the Consultants, set aside the demand raised by Ld. AO vide the Original Order, thereby confirming that the Respondent's practice of deducting TDS

M/S MODIPON LTD.,,MODINAGAR vs. ADDL. (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result the ground No

ITA 2276/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu

For Appellant: Shri Santosh Agarwal, Adv
Section 201(1)Section 246Section 246ASection 253Section 271CSection 272A(2)(k)Section 275

246 or section 246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within

M/S MODIPON LTD.,,MODINAGAR vs. ADDL. (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result the ground No

ITA 2275/DEL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu

For Appellant: Shri Santosh Agarwal, Adv
Section 201(1)Section 246Section 246ASection 253Section 271CSection 272A(2)(k)Section 275

246 or section 246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within

OXIGEN SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, RANGE-76, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 4902/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Delhi31 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Smita Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115Section 194BSection 194RSection 194SSection 246Section 246ASection 253Section 271CSection 274Section 275

246 or section 246A, and [the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or] the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall 4 Oxigen Services India Pvt. Ltd. be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 827/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 829/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1897/DEL/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 828/DEL/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1979/DEL/2012[2008-09 (F.Y. 2007-08)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1978/DEL/2012[2007-08 (F.Y. 2006-07)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

SUNIL DANDRAYAL,DEHRADUN vs. JCIT, CENTRAL RANGE, MEERUT

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 8069/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member), MS. ASTHA CHANDRA (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 246Section 246ASection 253Section 263Section 264Section 269SSection 271DSection 275(1)

246 or section 246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within