BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,545 results for “TDS”+ Section 201(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,585Delhi1,545Bangalore1,107Chennai652Kolkata465Karnataka256Indore241Pune173Jaipur164Raipur153Nagpur145Hyderabad144Ahmedabad141Cochin99Chandigarh62Surat54Jodhpur45Lucknow43Rajkot42Jabalpur42Panaji36Visakhapatnam29Telangana27Kerala26Dehradun24Cuttack24Agra18Amritsar17Patna17SC13Guwahati9Ranchi9Varanasi8Himachal Pradesh6Allahabad4Orissa3Rajasthan3J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)94TDS70Section 20169Section 194C60Deduction56Section 271C40Addition to Income36Section 194I32Section 4030Section 194J

DCIT, LAXMINAGAR vs. TURNER GENERAL ENTERTAINMENT NETWORKS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, MAHIPALPUR DELHI

In the result, assessee's appeal is partly

ITA 473/DEL/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Nov 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. M. Balaganesh & Sh. Sudhir Kumarassessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit Vs Turner General Laxmi Nagar Entertainment Net Works New Delhi India Limited Mahipalpur Delhi Tan No. Deln08096E (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 271CSection 3

3) to section 201 providing limitation period of two years for passing the order under section 201(1) from the end of the financial year in which statement of TDS

M/S HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,,NOIDA vs. ACIT (TDS), NOIDA

Showing 1–20 of 1,545 · Page 1 of 78

...
29
Section 194H27
Penalty20

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1723/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jul 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishihcl Technologies Ltd, Acit(Tds), Plot No. 3A, Tower 6, 14Th Floor, Vs. Noida Sector-126, Noida Pan: Aaach1645P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Neeraj Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

3) of section 201 of the Act which provides time limit of two years for passing order under section 201(1) of the Act for cases in which TDS

CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT. LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-73(1), DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1984/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Advocate a/wFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar Varma, Sr.D.R
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194ISection 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

201(1) /201(1A) of the Act, dated 29.03.2018 is clearly barred by limitation. We, thus, in terms of our aforesaid observations quash the order passed by the AO u/s.201(1)/201(1A), dated 29.03.2018 as barred by limitation. The Grounds of appeal Nos. 1 to 3 are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations. 11. We shall now advert

CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-73(1), NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 993/DEL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Advocate a/wFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar Varma, Sr.D.R
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194ISection 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

201(1) /201(1A) of the Act, dated 29.03.2018 is clearly barred by limitation. We, thus, in terms of our aforesaid observations quash the order passed by the AO u/s.201(1)/201(1A), dated 29.03.2018 as barred by limitation. The Grounds of appeal Nos. 1 to 3 are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations. 11. We shall now advert

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY,GURUGRAM vs. JCIT (OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 319/DEL/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjai Kumar Yadav, Addl.CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194ISection 201Section 201(1)Section 20i

3) of section 201 of the Act which provides time limit of two years for passing order under section 201(1) of the Act for cases in which TDS

M/S. HAMIR REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO (TDS), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5799/DEL/2015[2009-10 (F.Y. 2008-09)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Sept 2017

Bench: Shri G. D. Agrawal & Shri Amit Shukla

For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana,CIT (D.R.)
Section 201Section 201(3)

3) of section 201." 11. The memorandum explaining the provisions of Finance (2) Bill, 2009, which was in the form of a circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), reads as under: "f. Providing time limits for passing of orders u/s 201(1) holding a person to be an assessee in default Currently, the Income

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORP. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and COs of the assessee are allowed

ITA 685/LKW/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jun 2020AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

3,63,29,469/–. Accordingly order under section 201 (1) and section 201 (1A) of the income tax act 1961 was passed on 1 June 1999 by The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax, central circle – 1, Lucknow. 5. Assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned assessing officer preferred an appeal before The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) –II, Lucknow

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORP. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and COs of the assessee are allowed

ITA 686/LKW/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jun 2020AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

3,63,29,469/–. Accordingly order under section 201 (1) and section 201 (1A) of the income tax act 1961 was passed on 1 June 1999 by The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax, central circle – 1, Lucknow. 5. Assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned assessing officer preferred an appeal before The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) –II, Lucknow

M/S. GREEN LINE (DELHI),NEW DELHI vs. ITO (TDS), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in Green Line Earth Ltd

ITA 1103/DEL/2016[2003-04 (F.Y. 2002-03)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 May 2023

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2002-03 Green Line (Punjab), Vs Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aadfg5282H Assessment Year: 2002-03 Green Line (Delhi), Vs. Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaaps6803P Assessment Year: 2003-04 Green Line Earth Ltd., Vs. Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaacg6500C (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri K.R. Manjani, Advocate & Shri Tarun Aswani, Advocate Revenue By : Shri J.S. Minhas, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 02.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.05.2023

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Manjani, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri J.S. Minhas, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194HSection 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

TDS Officer for initiating 4 ITAs No.1102, 1103 & 1104//Del/2016 proceedings u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act on the assessee firm. The ld. AR had argued that this initiation of proceedings on 07.02.2011 and subsequent order passed on 29.03.2011 are barred by limitation as it is in violation of the provisions of section 201(3

M/S. GREEN LINE (PUNJAB),NEW DELHI vs. ITO (TDS), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in Green Line Earth Ltd

ITA 1102/DEL/2016[2002-03 (F.Y. 2001-02)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 May 2023

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2002-03 Green Line (Punjab), Vs Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aadfg5282H Assessment Year: 2002-03 Green Line (Delhi), Vs. Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaaps6803P Assessment Year: 2003-04 Green Line Earth Ltd., Vs. Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaacg6500C (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri K.R. Manjani, Advocate & Shri Tarun Aswani, Advocate Revenue By : Shri J.S. Minhas, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 02.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.05.2023

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Manjani, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri J.S. Minhas, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194HSection 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

TDS Officer for initiating 4 ITAs No.1102, 1103 & 1104//Del/2016 proceedings u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act on the assessee firm. The ld. AR had argued that this initiation of proceedings on 07.02.2011 and subsequent order passed on 29.03.2011 are barred by limitation as it is in violation of the provisions of section 201(3

M/S. GREEN LINE EARTH LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO (TDS), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in Green Line Earth Ltd

ITA 1104/DEL/2016[2003-04 (F.Y. 2002-03)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 May 2023

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2002-03 Green Line (Punjab), Vs Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aadfg5282H Assessment Year: 2002-03 Green Line (Delhi), Vs. Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaaps6803P Assessment Year: 2003-04 Green Line Earth Ltd., Vs. Ito (Tds), I-25, Lajpat Nagar-Iii, Ward-50(5), New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaacg6500C (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri K.R. Manjani, Advocate & Shri Tarun Aswani, Advocate Revenue By : Shri J.S. Minhas, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 02.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.05.2023

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Manjani, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri J.S. Minhas, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194HSection 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

TDS Officer for initiating 4 ITAs No.1102, 1103 & 1104//Del/2016 proceedings u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act on the assessee firm. The ld. AR had argued that this initiation of proceedings on 07.02.2011 and subsequent order passed on 29.03.2011 are barred by limitation as it is in violation of the provisions of section 201(3

M/S CIVITECH DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.,,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1964/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri O.P.Kant & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Kumar, FCAFor Respondent: Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 194Section 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 201(3)(i)Section 201o

TDS provisions under section 194-I of the Act by holding it as assessee in default and demanded to the tune of Rs.4,25,190/-was raised under section 201(1) of the Act and interest thereon. Interest component was subsequently modified by order dated 23/4/2015 under section 154 of the Act. 3

SH. VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD.,KARNAL vs. CIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the 03 Appeals i

ITA 3779/DEL/2013[2007-08 (F.Y. 2006-07)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2017

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor & Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(3)Section 250(6)Section 263

TDS) has effectively enhanced the time limitation prescribed under section 201(3) of the Act for completion of201 proceedings by a TDS

VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, KARNAL

In the result, all the 03 Appeals i

ITA 717/DEL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor & Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(3)Section 250(6)Section 263

TDS) has effectively enhanced the time limitation prescribed under section 201(3) of the Act for completion of201 proceedings by a TDS

VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, KARNAL

In the result, all the 03 Appeals i

ITA 716/DEL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor & Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(3)Section 250(6)Section 263

TDS) has effectively enhanced the time limitation prescribed under section 201(3) of the Act for completion of201 proceedings by a TDS

SH. VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD.,KARNAL vs. CIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the 03 Appeals i

ITA 3780/DEL/2013[2008-09 (F.Y. 2007- 08)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2017

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor & Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(3)Section 250(6)Section 263

TDS) has effectively enhanced the time limitation prescribed under section 201(3) of the Act for completion of201 proceedings by a TDS

VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, KARNAL

In the result, all the 03 Appeals i

ITA 718/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor & Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(3)Section 250(6)Section 263

TDS) has effectively enhanced the time limitation prescribed under section 201(3) of the Act for completion of201 proceedings by a TDS

SH. VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD.,KARNAL vs. CIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the 03 Appeals i

ITA 3781/DEL/2013[2009-10 (F.Y. 2008-09)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Nov 2017

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor & Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(3)Section 250(6)Section 263

TDS) has effectively enhanced the time limitation prescribed under section 201(3) of the Act for completion of201 proceedings by a TDS

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK,AMBALA vs. ITO TDS, KARNAL

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2117/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Delhi06 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. N. K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year: 2013-14 Punjab National Bank Vs. Ito Ambala, Haryana -134003 Tds Pan No.Aaacp01656G Karnal (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Lalit Garg, Fca Respondent By Sh. Vivek Vardhan, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 06/12/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 06/12/2023 Order Per N. K. Billaiya, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Preferred Against The Order Dated 26.05.2023 By Nfac, Delhi Pertaining To A.Y.2013-14. 2. The Grievance Of The Assessee Read As Under :- 1. That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) Under Section 250 Of The Act Is Bad, Both In The Eye Of Law & On Facts As It Is Time Barred As Per Limitation Given Under Section 201(3).

Section 2Section 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 250

TDS) under section 250 of the act is bad, both in the eye of law and on facts as it is time barred as per limitation given under section 201(3

W SERVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1040/DEL/2020[2013-14 (26Q-Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

3) of section 206C which is to be delivered or caused to be delivered for tax deducted at source or tax collected at source, as the case may be, on or after the 1st day of July, 2012.]” 5. Kind attention of the Tribunal is also drawn to the Memorandum to the Finance Bill, 2012 which elaborates the rationale / explanatory