BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,109 results for “TDS”+ Section 195clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,109Mumbai1,020Bangalore624Chennai471Kolkata136Karnataka132Ahmedabad103Jaipur68Pune50Hyderabad49Chandigarh31Rajkot21Visakhapatnam20Lucknow17Raipur16Indore16Cochin15Dehradun9Telangana8Nagpur6SC5Jabalpur4Surat4Agra3Calcutta3Amritsar2Kerala2Punjab & Haryana1Patna1Panaji1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)67Addition to Income62Section 271(1)(c)60Double Taxation/DTAA47Disallowance40Section 19538Section 4036TDS33Deduction31Section 9(1)(vi)

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION vs. GE PACKAGED POWER INC

ITA/352/2014HC Delhi12 Jan 2015

TDS) under Section 195(2) or 195(3) either by the non-resident or by the resident payer is to avoid

DCIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. EXPRO GULF LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 6589/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Feb 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: : Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 44BSection 44D

Showing 1–20 of 1,109 · Page 1 of 56

...
23
Section 14721
Penalty21
Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS) under Section 195(2) or 195(3) either by the non- resident or by the resident payer is to avoid

ADIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PARPOOL LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, solitary ground of appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3316/DEL/2012[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Jun 2016AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri H S Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Mr. R S Negi Sr DR
Section 154Section 195Section 201Section 209(1)(d)Section 234Section 234B

TDS) under Section 195(2) or 195(3) either by the non-resident or by the resident payer is to avoid

DDIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SCORPION COURAGEOUS LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4619/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Apr 2016AY 2008-09
Section 143(2)Section 234BSection 44BSection 44DSection 9

TDS) under Section 195(2) or 195(3) either by the non-resident or by the resident payer is to avoid

ROLLS ROYCE MILITARY AERO ENGINES LTD vs. DDIT INT. TAXATION CIRCLE 2 (1),

In the result all the five appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 785/DEL/2008[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2016AY 2000-2001

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Mukesh Bhutani, AdvFor Respondent: Sh R.S. Negi, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS) under Section 195(2) or 195(3) either by the non-resident or by the resident payer is to avoid

ROLLS ROYCE MILITARY AERO ENGINES LTD vs. DDIT INTL. TAXATION CIRCLE-2 (1),

In the result all the five appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 784/DEL/2008[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2016AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Mukesh Bhutani, AdvFor Respondent: Sh R.S. Negi, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS) under Section 195(2) or 195(3) either by the non-resident or by the resident payer is to avoid

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. HALLIBURTON OFFSHORE SERVICES INC., DEHRADUN

ITA 1332/DEL/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri I.C.Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishiadit, Halliburton Offshore Services International Taxation, Inc. , Vs. 13-A,Subhash Road, C/O. Nangia & Company, Ca, Aayakar Bhawan, 75/7, Rajpur Road, Dehradun Dehradun Pan:Aaach5154M (Appellant) (Respondent) Halliburton Offshore Services Addl. Cit, Inc. , International Taxation, Vs. C/O. Nangia & Company, Ca, Subhash Road, Suite-4A, Plaza M-6, Jasola, Dehradun New Delhi Pan:Aaach5154M (Appellant) (Respondent) Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. , Adit, C/O. Nangia & Company, Ca, International Taxation, Vs. Suite-4A, Plaza M-6, Jasola, 13-A,Subhash Road, New Delhi Aayakar Bhawan, Pan:Aaach5154M Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. Vs Ddit (International Taxation)

Section 144CSection 44Section 44BSection 9

TDS) under Section 195(2) or 195(3) either by the non-resident or by the resident payer is to avoid

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S XANSA INDIA LTD., NOIDA

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2283/DEL/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Ankur Garg, CIT DR
Section 10ASection 40Section 40a

195. Hence, apart from Section 9(1), Sections 4, 5, 9, 90, 91 as well as the provisions of DTAA are also relevant, while applying tax deduction at source provisions. Reference to ITO(TDS

SERCO INDIA PVT. LTD.,PUNE vs. DCIT, GURGAON

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 1432/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shrianil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri N. K. Choudhry, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, Ld. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 92C

TDS was required to be deducted under section 192 or 195. 4. TDS in section 192 is at higher rate

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4 DELHI vs. MITSUBISHI CORPORATION (INDIA) PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed against the

ITA - 329 / 2025HC Delhi22 Aug 2025
Section 195Section 260ASection 40Section 40A

TDS) that the question of making an order under Section 195 (2) will arise. While deciding the scope of Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 04 DELHI vs. MITSUBISHI CORPORATION (INDIA) PVT LTD

The appeal is dismissed against the Revenue

ITA/370/2025HC Delhi03 Sept 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

Section 195Section 260ASection 40Section 40A

TDS) that the question of making an order under Section 195 (2) will arise. While deciding the scope of Section

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 vs. UNISION HOTELS LTD.

ITA/1118/2017HC Delhi10 Apr 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Section 10Section 115Section 194LSection 195Section 195(1)Section 276BSection 48

TDS) that the question of making an order under Section 195 (2) will arise. While deciding the scope of Section

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. KULBEER SINGH, NEW DELHI

ITA 5204/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiito, Vs. Kulbeer Singh, Ward-26(1), H-432, Vikas Puri, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Amqps5847P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 195Section 197Section 40Section 9

TDS liability on such commission is an offshoot from its chargeability to Income tax under Section 5(2) of the Act. 5.3 Section 195

ACIT, CIRCLE- 47(1), NEW DELHI vs. J. KISHORE EXPORTS, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1551/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu & Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2014-15] Acit, Vs J.Kishore Exports, Circle-47(1), 558, Katra Ishwar Bhawan, New Delhi. Khari Baoli, New Delhi-110006. Pan-Aagfj9713M Appellant Respondent Appellant By Sh. Ashwani Kalia, Ca Respondent By Sh. Umesh Takyar, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 01.11.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 23.11.2021

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 195(2)

Section 195 mandates deduction of TDS on commission payments to non- residents. However, if any sum is not chargeable as income

CIENA INDIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 984/DEL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Ms. Reetika Garg (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Surender Pal (Sr. DR)
Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

Section 195(2) is not merely a provision to provide information to the ITO(TDS). It is a provision requiring

CIENA INDIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 959/DEL/2011[2007-08 (F.Y. 2006-07)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jun 2018

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Ms. Reetika Garg (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. Surender Pal (Sr. DR)
Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

Section 195(2) is not merely a provision to provide information to the ITO(TDS). It is a provision requiring

GATES INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO (TDS), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 813/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2016AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. V. Mehrotra & Smt. Beena A. Pillai

For Appellant: Shri K. L. Chandok, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajsh Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 195Section 201Section 9Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 195(2) is not merely a provision to provide information to the ITO(TDS). It is a provision requiring

USHA SHARMA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal and stay application of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 6564/DEL/2016[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2017AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

Section 194Section 195Section 195(1)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS of Rs.14,00,000/- as per provisions of section 195 and TDS notification u/s. 194-IA. The appellant, however

M/S. HAMIR REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO (TDS), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5799/DEL/2015[2009-10 (F.Y. 2008-09)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Sept 2017

Bench: Shri G. D. Agrawal & Shri Amit Shukla

For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana,CIT (D.R.)
Section 201Section 201(3)

TDS under section 195. Before the Assessing Officer, the assessee had challenged the limitation for issuance of such notice after

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ERICSSON COMMUNICATIONS LTD

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/106/2002HC Delhi04 Sept 2015
For Appellant: Mr Rohit Madan and Mr Zoheb HossainFor Respondent: Mr M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr Mayank
Section 195Section 201Section 23Section 260A

TDS under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 18.8.1998 when it credited a sum of Rs.2,24,96,669/- to the account