BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

265 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai371Delhi265Bangalore163Chandigarh120Nagpur106Kolkata103Chennai103Pune101Karnataka70Ahmedabad69Hyderabad69Jaipur64Cochin60Visakhapatnam48Cuttack40Raipur22Rajkot16Panaji15Jodhpur14Amritsar14Surat14Indore8Telangana8SC8Jabalpur7Dehradun7Kerala4Ranchi4Allahabad4Lucknow4Guwahati3Agra3J&K2Varanasi2Patna2

Key Topics

Section 4094Section 20179Section 194A77TDS76Addition to Income62Section 201(1)59Deduction43Section 2842Section 143(3)29Disallowance

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORP. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and COs of the assessee are allowed

ITA 685/LKW/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jun 2020AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS Ward-2, Lucknow and with the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Lucknow no jurisdiction was vested. 3. That the ld CIT(A) is fully justified in holding that the provisions of section 194A

Showing 1–20 of 265 · Page 1 of 14

...
29
Section 15421
Section 14A21

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORP. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and COs of the assessee are allowed

ITA 686/LKW/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jun 2020AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS Ward-2, Lucknow and with the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Lucknow no jurisdiction was vested. 3. That the ld CIT(A) is fully justified in holding that the provisions of section 194A

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S GARDENIA SHELTERS (P) LTD., NOIDA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and Cross

ITA 612/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Jul 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G. D. Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Smt. Beena A. Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasanthan, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri C S Agarwal, Sr. Adv
Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 194J

194A(3)(iii)(f) of the I T Act, no TDS on the interest paid to the NOIDA is chargeable to TDS. The Corporation has been established under a Provincial Act and not by a Provincial Act. Therefore Corporation would not qualify for exemption from the provisions of Section

M/S. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5968/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jan 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh.AjayWadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K.Saroha, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS), Ghaziabad A Y 2005-06 to 2011-12 ITA No 5968 to 5974/ Del/2015 7. Sub-section (1) of section 194A

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

ITA 2480/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 40

TDS on specified payments (sections 194A-194N), the amount shall be disallowed. The question is: how much? The statute is not clear

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

ITA 2478/DEL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 40

TDS on specified payments (sections 194A-194N), the amount shall be disallowed. The question is: how much? The statute is not clear

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

ITA 2479/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 40

TDS on specified payments (sections 194A-194N), the amount shall be disallowed. The question is: how much? The statute is not clear

LAND ACQUISTION OFFICE,GURGAON vs. DCIT (TDS), GURGAON

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 41/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Jitender Wadhwa, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.C. Swain, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 28Section 34Section 56

TDS for this amount. 12. When the provisions of section 194A of the Income Tax Act is not applicable on the transaction

LAND ACQUISTION OFFICE,GURGAON vs. DCIT (TDS), GURGAON

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 39/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Jitender Wadhwa, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.C. Swain, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 28Section 34Section 56

TDS for this amount. 12. When the provisions of section 194A of the Income Tax Act is not applicable on the transaction

LAND ACQUISTION OFFICE,GURGAON vs. DCIT (TDS), GURGAON

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 40/DEL/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Jitender Wadhwa, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.C. Swain, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 28Section 34Section 56

TDS for this amount. 12. When the provisions of section 194A of the Income Tax Act is not applicable on the transaction

JCIT(TDS), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6788/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjiv Sapra, FCA
Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS on various payments of interest in terms of section 194A. In response to show cause notice by the ACIT

JCIT(TDS), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6789/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Oct 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjiv Sapra, FCA
Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS on various payments of interest in terms of section 194A. In response to show cause notice by the ACIT

JCIT(TDS), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6790/DEL/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjiv Sapra, FCA
Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS on various payments of interest in terms of section 194A. In response to show cause notice by the ACIT

THE BRANCH MANAGER,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6676/DEL/2015[2014-15 (F.Y. 2013-14)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2018

Bench: Shri G. D. Agrawal & Ms Suchitra Kamble & The Branch Manager Vs Addl. Cit (Tds) Axis Bank Ltd. Ghaziabad No. B2-B3, Sector-16 Noida Aaacu2414K (Respondent) (Appellant)

Section 194ASection 194A(3)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 4

TDS u/s 194A because the NOIDA Authority and Greater NOIDA Authority fall in exempted category provided in Section 194A(3)(iii)(f) of the Act covered

THE BRANCH MANAGER,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6675/DEL/2015[2013-14 (F.Y.- 2012-13)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2018

Bench: Shri G. D. Agrawal & Ms Suchitra Kamble & The Branch Manager Vs Addl. Cit (Tds) Axis Bank Ltd. Ghaziabad No. B2-B3, Sector-16 Noida Aaacu2414K (Respondent) (Appellant)

Section 194ASection 194A(3)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 4

TDS u/s 194A because the NOIDA Authority and Greater NOIDA Authority fall in exempted category provided in Section 194A(3)(iii)(f) of the Act covered

DCIT (TDS), DEHRADUN vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 38/DEL/2015[2013-14 (F.Y.- 2012-13)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2018

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Kuldip Singh, Jm Ita No. 38/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs State Bank Of India, Tax(Tds), Tel Bhawan, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Mrtuo0659B Assessee By : Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 26.04.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Department Against The Order Dated 17.10.2014 Of The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Dehradun.

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 33A

TDS on interest payment to ONGC Ltd., Dehradun on Site Restoration Fund Account ignoring the facts that SRF Account is a time deposit account in which deposits are made for a fixed period and which carries interest as applicable to time deposits. 2. Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in holding that provisions of section 194A

DCIT (TDS), GURGAON vs. THE SONIPAT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD., SONEPAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 706/DEL/2015[2011-12 (F.Y. 2010-11)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Aug 2016

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhua.Y. : 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Gautam Jain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. A Srinivasa Rao, Sr. DR
Section 1Section 133ASection 194ASection 197ASection 201(1)Section 206A

TDS under section 194A read with section 197 of the Act, which as submitted above 8 in light of the judgment

STERNAL BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 24(2), DELHI, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 99/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Smt. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 196Section 40

TDS, the AO was correct in making disallowance as per the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. ” 6. Thus it is the case of assessee that the AO has treated the EDC payment as interest payment under Section 194A

DCIT (TDS), DEHRADUN vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 4458/DEL/2016[2015-16 (F.Y. 2014-15)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Nov 2017

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Joginder Singh, Jm Ita No. 4458/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs State Bank Of India, Tax(Tds), Tel Bhawan, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Mrts02193C Assessee By : Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 09.11.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.11.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Department Against The Order Dated 27.05.2016 By Ld. Cit(A), Dehradun.

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 33A

Section 194A mandates the payer of interest to deduct TDS at the time of credit of such interest to the account

ACIT CIRCLE-28(1), NEW DELHI vs. MODESTY GARMENTS, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 183/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2014-15 Acit Vs. M/S Modesty Garments, Circle-28(1), B-304, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 065 Pan Aaafm1598F (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Mohit Gupta, CA, Sh. NeerajFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar Verma, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 194A(3)(iv)Section 194ISection 37(1)Section 40Section 68

TDS in view of the provisions of section 194A(3)(iv) of the Act. The explanation was not acceptable to the Ld. AO who disallowed