BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

262 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai369Delhi262Bangalore159Chennai107Nagpur105Chandigarh99Kolkata92Karnataka70Pune51Jaipur51Ahmedabad41Hyderabad36Visakhapatnam19Cochin18Panaji13Rajkot12Raipur12Jodhpur10Surat8SC8Telangana8Indore6Jabalpur5Cuttack5Ranchi4Kerala4Lucknow4Amritsar3Patna3Allahabad3Guwahati2J&K2

Key Topics

Section 201102Section 194A86TDS82Section 201(1)79Section 4064Addition to Income56Section 2851Deduction50Section 143(3)37Section 194C

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORP. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and COs of the assessee are allowed

ITA 686/LKW/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jun 2020AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS Ward-2, Lucknow and with the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Lucknow no jurisdiction was vested. 3. That the ld CIT(A) is fully justified in holding that the provisions of section 194A

Showing 1–20 of 262 · Page 1 of 14

...
36
Disallowance25
Section 19422

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORP. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and COs of the assessee are allowed

ITA 685/LKW/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jun 2020AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS Ward-2, Lucknow and with the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Lucknow no jurisdiction was vested. 3. That the ld CIT(A) is fully justified in holding that the provisions of section 194A

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S GARDENIA SHELTERS (P) LTD., NOIDA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and Cross

ITA 612/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Jul 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G. D. Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Smt. Beena A. Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasanthan, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri C S Agarwal, Sr. Adv
Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 194J

194A(3)(iii)(f) of the I T Act, no TDS on the interest paid to the NOIDA is chargeable to TDS. The Corporation has been established under a Provincial Act and not by a Provincial Act. Therefore Corporation would not qualify for exemption from the provisions of Section

M/S. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5968/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Jan 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh.AjayWadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K.Saroha, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS), Ghaziabad A Y 2005-06 to 2011-12 ITA No 5968 to 5974/ Del/2015 7. Sub-section (1) of section 194A

LAND ACQUISTION OFFICE,GURGAON vs. DCIT (TDS), GURGAON

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 41/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Jitender Wadhwa, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.C. Swain, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 28Section 34Section 56

TDS for this amount. 12. When the provisions of section 194A of the Income Tax Act is not applicable on the transaction

LAND ACQUISTION OFFICE,GURGAON vs. DCIT (TDS), GURGAON

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 39/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Jitender Wadhwa, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.C. Swain, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 28Section 34Section 56

TDS for this amount. 12. When the provisions of section 194A of the Income Tax Act is not applicable on the transaction

LAND ACQUISTION OFFICE,GURGAON vs. DCIT (TDS), GURGAON

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 40/DEL/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Jitender Wadhwa, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.C. Swain, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 28Section 34Section 56

TDS for this amount. 12. When the provisions of section 194A of the Income Tax Act is not applicable on the transaction

JCIT(TDS), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6788/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjiv Sapra, FCA
Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS on various payments of interest in terms of section 194A. In response to show cause notice by the ACIT

JCIT(TDS), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6789/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Oct 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjiv Sapra, FCA
Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS on various payments of interest in terms of section 194A. In response to show cause notice by the ACIT

JCIT(TDS), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6790/DEL/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Shri Sanjiv Sapra, FCA
Section 133ASection 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS on various payments of interest in terms of section 194A. In response to show cause notice by the ACIT

THE BRANCH MANAGER,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6675/DEL/2015[2013-14 (F.Y.- 2012-13)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2018

Bench: Shri G. D. Agrawal & Ms Suchitra Kamble & The Branch Manager Vs Addl. Cit (Tds) Axis Bank Ltd. Ghaziabad No. B2-B3, Sector-16 Noida Aaacu2414K (Respondent) (Appellant)

Section 194ASection 194A(3)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 4

TDS u/s 194A because the NOIDA Authority and Greater NOIDA Authority fall in exempted category provided in Section 194A(3)(iii)(f) of the Act covered

THE BRANCH MANAGER,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6676/DEL/2015[2014-15 (F.Y. 2013-14)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2018

Bench: Shri G. D. Agrawal & Ms Suchitra Kamble & The Branch Manager Vs Addl. Cit (Tds) Axis Bank Ltd. Ghaziabad No. B2-B3, Sector-16 Noida Aaacu2414K (Respondent) (Appellant)

Section 194ASection 194A(3)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 4

TDS u/s 194A because the NOIDA Authority and Greater NOIDA Authority fall in exempted category provided in Section 194A(3)(iii)(f) of the Act covered

DCIT (TDS), DEHRADUN vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 38/DEL/2015[2013-14 (F.Y.- 2012-13)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2018

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Kuldip Singh, Jm Ita No. 38/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs State Bank Of India, Tax(Tds), Tel Bhawan, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Mrtuo0659B Assessee By : Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 26.04.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Department Against The Order Dated 17.10.2014 Of The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Dehradun.

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 33A

TDS on interest payment to ONGC Ltd., Dehradun on Site Restoration Fund Account ignoring the facts that SRF Account is a time deposit account in which deposits are made for a fixed period and which carries interest as applicable to time deposits. 2. Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in holding that provisions of section 194A

DCIT (TDS), GURGAON vs. THE SONIPAT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD., SONEPAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 706/DEL/2015[2011-12 (F.Y. 2010-11)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Aug 2016

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhua.Y. : 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Gautam Jain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. A Srinivasa Rao, Sr. DR
Section 1Section 133ASection 194ASection 197ASection 201(1)Section 206A

TDS under section 194A read with section 197 of the Act, which as submitted above 8 in light of the judgment

STERNAL BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 24(2), DELHI, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 99/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Smt. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 196Section 40

TDS, the AO was correct in making disallowance as per the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. ” 6. Thus it is the case of assessee that the AO has treated the EDC payment as interest payment under Section 194A

DCIT (TDS), DEHRADUN vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 4458/DEL/2016[2015-16 (F.Y. 2014-15)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Nov 2017

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Joginder Singh, Jm Ita No. 4458/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs State Bank Of India, Tax(Tds), Tel Bhawan, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Mrts02193C Assessee By : Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 09.11.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.11.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Department Against The Order Dated 27.05.2016 By Ld. Cit(A), Dehradun.

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 33A

Section 194A mandates the payer of interest to deduct TDS at the time of credit of such interest to the account

ACIT CIRCLE-28(1), NEW DELHI vs. MODESTY GARMENTS, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 183/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2014-15 Acit Vs. M/S Modesty Garments, Circle-28(1), B-304, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 065 Pan Aaafm1598F (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Mohit Gupta, CA, Sh. NeerajFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar Verma, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 194A(3)(iv)Section 194ISection 37(1)Section 40Section 68

TDS in view of the provisions of section 194A(3)(iv) of the Act. The explanation was not acceptable to the Ld. AO who disallowed

LAND ACQUISITION OFFICE,GURGAON vs. DCIT, (TDS), GURGAON

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 643/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2013-14 Vs. Dcit (Tds), Land Acquisition Officer, Huda Complex, Sector-14, Gurgaon Gurgaon Pan :Rtklo0706G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Ms. Jaya Choudhary, Cit(Dr)

Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 201(1)(A)Section 28Section 34Section 56

TDS provision enshrined under section 194A of the Act. In the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2012-13 the assessee

ATS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,NOIDA vs. DCIT (TDS), NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1917/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. Mala Rajan, CA &For Respondent: Shri Umesh Chand Dubey, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 194CSection 194ISection 201Section 201(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271C

TDS) (Addl.CIT) is patently against law, erroneous and merits to be quashed. 2. That, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Addl.CIT has grossly erred in levying a penalty of Rs.94,01,465 under section 271C of the Act for non-deduction of tax at source under section 194A

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VIKAS VASUDEVA, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6525/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Aug 2016AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Goyal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. FR Meena, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 194(3)(iii)Section 194ASection 40

TDS has been deducted as per the provision of section 194A of I.T. Act which attracts the provisions of disallowance