BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

505 results for “TDS”+ Section 194(3)(v)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai512Delhi505Bangalore226Karnataka177Chennai119Kolkata108Chandigarh54Ahmedabad44Jaipur37Raipur34Indore33Pune20Telangana13Cochin13Hyderabad10Visakhapatnam7Amritsar7Dehradun7SC7Lucknow5Cuttack5Surat4Guwahati4Rajkot4Patna3Jabalpur2Orissa1Calcutta1Nagpur1Ranchi1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1J&K1Allahabad1Kerala1

Key Topics

Addition to Income50Section 143(3)47Disallowance33Section 6830Section 153A28Section 201(1)27TDS24Section 194I21Deduction17Natural Justice

HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms, but in the circumstances, with

ITA/194/2004HC Delhi01 Aug 2016

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271

3 of the said order which has been extracted hereinbefore, the ITAT specifically recorded that the Appellant was not disputing any longer its liability to deduct TDS under Section 194-I of the Act. Therefore, as far as the Appellant was concerned, it had accepted the order dated 21st May 2004 of this Court in the quantum proceedings which imparted

M/S STATE BANK OF PATIALA,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result appeals filed by the appellant are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 505 · Page 1 of 26

...
17
Section 11516
Section 20115
ITA 6850/DEL/2015[2008-09 (F.Y. 2007-08)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Mar 2017

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Pankaj Garg, AdvFor Respondent: Sh SK Jain, DR
Section 10Section 154Section 201(1)

Tds) And Another Respondent :- Canara Bank Counsel for Appellant :- Ashok Kumar,Praveen Kumar Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J. This appeal, which has been filed under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 19611 at the instance of the Department, was admitted on the following question of law : "(A) Whether the ITAT as well

M/S DENA BANK,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result appeals filed by the appellant are allowed

ITA 6851/DEL/2015[2008-09 (F.Y. 2007-08)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Mar 2017

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Pankaj Garg, AdvFor Respondent: Sh SK Jain, DR
Section 10Section 154Section 201(1)

Tds) And Another Respondent :- Canara Bank Counsel for Appellant :- Ashok Kumar,Praveen Kumar Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J. This appeal, which has been filed under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 19611 at the instance of the Department, was admitted on the following question of law : "(A) Whether the ITAT as well

ACIT, DELHI vs. M/S. THE INDIAN NEWS PAPER SOCIETY, NEW DELHI

ITA 116/DEL/2017[2012-13 (F.Y. 2011-12)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Jan 2021

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Ranjan Chopra, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Parul Garg, Sr. DR
Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)

194-1 on the lease premium paid to the Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority and consequently, the assessee cannot be deemed as assessee-in-default. The TDS Officer vide order dated March 30, 2012 rejected all the contentions of the assessee and proceeded to saddle the demand of Rs. 8,39,81,641 under section

DIRECTOR OF NCOME TAX-1 vs. M/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD.

ITA/565/2016HC Delhi28 Sept 2016

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

Section 194

v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut Camp & Ors., decided on 28.02.2011 (in Writ- Tax No. 1338 of 2005) which states how NOIDA is not a local authority and is therefore not exempt from TDS provisions of the Act. 10. Section 194-I reads as follows: "Rent. 194-I. Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family

ASSERTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO WARD 3(3), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4200/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 250Section 40

TDS under section 1941A while making payment to Logix Builders and Promoters Private Limited.\n\n(ii) That the CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the AO rejecting the contention of the assessee that the provisions of section 1941A are not applicable and hence no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) can be made

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

ITA 2478/DEL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 40

194; surcharge is an additional levy on the tax itself under section 1 IB. The fact that the assessee deposited surcharge does not reduce the TDS liability on the principal amount. The assessee's conflation of TDS and surcharge is a fundamental error in understanding the statutory scheme. The AO correctly disallowed the proportionate amount based on the TDS shortfall

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

ITA 2479/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 40

194; surcharge is an additional levy on the tax itself under section 1 IB. The fact that the assessee deposited surcharge does not reduce the TDS liability on the principal amount. The assessee's conflation of TDS and surcharge is a fundamental error in understanding the statutory scheme. The AO correctly disallowed the proportionate amount based on the TDS shortfall

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

ITA 2480/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 40

194; surcharge is an additional levy on the tax itself under section 1 IB. The fact that the assessee deposited surcharge does not reduce the TDS liability on the principal amount. The assessee's conflation of TDS and surcharge is a fundamental error in understanding the statutory scheme. The AO correctly disallowed the proportionate amount based on the TDS shortfall

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI vs. KRBL LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1344/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI vs. KRBL LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1341/DEL/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

KRBL LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 07, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1202/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI vs. KRBL LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1339/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI vs. KRBL LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1338/DEL/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

KRBL LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 07, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1199/DEL/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

KRBL LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 07, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1196/DEL/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

KRBL LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 07, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1200/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

KRBL LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 07, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1197/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI vs. KRBL LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1340/DEL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 19, NEW DELHI vs. KRBL LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 1343/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. A.D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1196/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 1197/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi J. Goswami, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 153A

Section 2(p)] (1) When any question arises as to whether any person is a producer or not for the purposes of the Act, the Director on receipt of a complaint in this behalf, shall make enquiries from ITA Nos.1338 to 1344/Del/2020 KRBL Ltd. the Tahsildar concerned, whether the person against whom complaint has been made, either cultivates the land