BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

135 results for “TDS”+ Section 115Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi135Mumbai93Bangalore45Dehradun28Kolkata13Chennai11SC1Jaipur1Karnataka1Pune1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Double Taxation/DTAA56Section 44B54Section 143(3)48Addition to Income45Section 932Section 115A32Section 44D31Section 14821TDS21Deduction

KISAN INTERNATIONAL TRADING FZE,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, INT. TAX 2(1)(2), DELHI

In the result, the appeal field by the assessee is allowed

ITA 6152/DEL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Kisan International Trading Fze, Vs. Acit, Circle C/O Shri Tarandeep Singh, Advocate Int. Tax 2(1)(2), C – 179, Mansarover Garden, Delhi. New Delhi – 110 015. (Pan :Aaeck0424D) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Tarandeep Singh, Advocate Shri Sandeep Yadav, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Vikram Singh Sharma, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 21.08.2025 Date Of Order : 19.11.2025 Order Per S. Rifaur Rahman: 1. The Assessee Has Filed Appeal Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), Delhi – 43 [“Ld. Cit(A)”, For Short] Dated 06.12.2024 For The Assessment Year 2012-13 Raising Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. That On Facts & In Law The Order Dated 06Th December 2024 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred To As The "Cit(A)'} & Order Dated 23Rd December 2019 Passed By The Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Referred To As The "Ao") Are Bad In Law & Void Ab Initio.

For Appellant: Shri Tarandeep Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vikram Singh Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 115A(5)Section 147Section 148Section 195

Showing 1–20 of 135 · Page 1 of 7

21
Section 234B20
Section 144C20
Section 251

TDS was deducted as per provisions of section 115A(5), assessee was not required to submit a return of income

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), GURGAON vs. M/S. MSV INTERNATIONAL INC., GURGAON

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2187/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri R.K. Panda

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 44D

115A of the Act. According to the assessing officer it is chargeable to tax u/s 44D and according to assessee it s chargeable to tax under the normal provision of taxation as it is not fees for technical services as per section 9 (1) (vii) of the act. Further as the assessee is a non resident it is also claimed

ARGOS HOLDINGS PTE. LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INT TAX 1(1)(1), DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3633/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR
Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 194LSection 1ISection 260Section 6(3)Section 6(3)(ii)

TDS at the applicable rate of 5.253% has been deducted on the entire interest income of the Company from the NCOs held in SVHPL is enclosed herewith as Annexure 5. 2.3. Hence, under Section 115A

ARGOS HOLDINGS PTE. LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INT TAX 1(1)(1), DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3632/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR
Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 194LSection 1ISection 260Section 6(3)Section 6(3)(ii)

TDS at the applicable rate of 5.253% has been deducted on the entire interest income of the Company from the NCOs held in SVHPL is enclosed herewith as Annexure 5. 2.3. Hence, under Section 115A

PACIFIC CREST PTE LTD,NOIDA vs. DCIT CIRCLE-2(2)(2) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 661/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 115ASection 144Section 144(1)(b)Section 144CSection 147Section 148Section 195Section 44BSection 44DSection 9(1)(vi)

115A read with Explanation refers to the definition of royalty as defined in Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi) of the Act. As stated earlier, Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi) defines the term royalty. In the facts of the present case, undisputedly, learned DRP has treated the receipts as royalty in terms of Explanation 2(iva), which

DDIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SCORPION COURAGEOUS LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4619/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Apr 2016AY 2008-09
Section 143(2)Section 234BSection 44BSection 44DSection 9

TDS) under Section 195(2) or 195(3) either by the non-resident or by the resident payer is to avoid any future hassles for both resident as well as non resident. In our view, Sections 195(2) and 195(3) are safeguards. The said provisions are of practical importance. This reasoning of ours is based on the decision

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. HALLIBURTON OFFSHORE SERVICES INC., DEHRADUN

ITA 1332/DEL/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri I.C.Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishiadit, Halliburton Offshore Services International Taxation, Inc. , Vs. 13-A,Subhash Road, C/O. Nangia & Company, Ca, Aayakar Bhawan, 75/7, Rajpur Road, Dehradun Dehradun Pan:Aaach5154M (Appellant) (Respondent) Halliburton Offshore Services Addl. Cit, Inc. , International Taxation, Vs. C/O. Nangia & Company, Ca, Subhash Road, Suite-4A, Plaza M-6, Jasola, Dehradun New Delhi Pan:Aaach5154M (Appellant) (Respondent) Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. , Adit, C/O. Nangia & Company, Ca, International Taxation, Vs. Suite-4A, Plaza M-6, Jasola, 13-A,Subhash Road, New Delhi Aayakar Bhawan, Pan:Aaach5154M Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. Vs Ddit (International Taxation)

Section 144CSection 44Section 44BSection 9

115A of the Act depending on fact whether such receipts are effectively connected with PE or fixed place of profession, or not. However, for assessment year 2004-05 to 2010- 11 the consideration received for fee for technical services rendered in connection with prospecting for or extraction or production of mineral oil though effectively connected with PE or fixed place

ADIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. SANJIV GHAI, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5867/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

ADIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. SANJIV GHAI, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5868/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

ADIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. SANJIV GHAI, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5865/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

SHRI SANJIV GHAI,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5682/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

ADIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. SANJIV GHAI, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5866/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

SHRI SANJIV GHAI,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5684/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

ADIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. SANJIV GHAI, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5864/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

SHRI SANJIV GHAI,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5681/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

SHRI SANJIV GHAI,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5686/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

SHRI SANJIV GHAI,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5683/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

SHRI SANJIV GHAI,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, I.T.A. Nos

ITA 5685/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri K. Narasimha Charyi.T.A. Nos.5681 To 5686/Del/2014 Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S. R. Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 194J

115A(1)(BB) of the Act prior to its substation by the Finance Act, 2013 read with section Sub-section (2) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act. Further, it is also prayed to delete the addition of Rs.8.25 lacs on account of difference of receipts from Rich Kwality Products P. Ltd. and Kwality Frozen Foods P. Ltd. respective

M/S. DOLPHIN DRILLING PTE. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 355/DEL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Feb 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: : Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahuassessment Year: 2007-08

Section 143(3)Section 92C

115A read with Section 44D of the Income-tax Act, 1961." (emphasis supplied) Therefore, as clarified by the CBDT, rendering of services like imparting of training and carrying drilling operations for exploration or exploitation of natural gas would be outside the purview of “fees for technical services” under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. Taking note of the aforesaid

ARIBA INC,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT (INTL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 4584/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional income and held that