BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4,623 results for “TDS”+ Section 11clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,676Delhi4,623Bangalore2,378Chennai1,707Kolkata1,197Pune894Hyderabad604Ahmedabad563Jaipur407Raipur395Indore370Karnataka308Cochin304Chandigarh280Nagpur261Surat207Visakhapatnam183Rajkot144Lucknow125Cuttack91Amritsar82Jodhpur66Patna60Ranchi56Dehradun52Agra49Telangana44Panaji41Guwahati38Jabalpur22SC21Allahabad18Varanasi14Calcutta13Kerala13Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan6J&K3Punjab & Haryana3Uttarakhand3Orissa2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)80Addition to Income65Section 271(1)(c)36Section 143(2)35TDS35Disallowance34Deduction29Section 153C28Section 143(1)22Section 147

RAMA DEVI MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. JCIT, RANGE-2, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 4434/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Ravi Kant Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 11Section 13Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 40

TDS u/s 40(a)(ia). Against the assessment order, the Assessee appealed before the Ld. CIT(A), who vide his impugned order dated 30.3.2017 has enhanced the income at Rs. 2,61,15,153/-. Ld. CIT(A), discussed the concept and theory of charitable purposes as defined in section 2(15) and conditions laid down in section 11

Showing 1–20 of 4,623 · Page 1 of 232

...
22
Section 80I17
Section 142(1)17

ADIT(E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2872/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

TDS Aarti Rai 29,750/- Dr. 6. From the above details, Assessing Officer inferred that these payments are in violation of Section 13(1)(c) read with section 13(3) and on these account the assessee is liable to lose its exemption. He further noted the name of these two persons does not appear as employee of the Banyan Tree

ITO (E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1131/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

TDS Aarti Rai 29,750/- Dr. 6. From the above details, Assessing Officer inferred that these payments are in violation of Section 13(1)(c) read with section 13(3) and on these account the assessee is liable to lose its exemption. He further noted the name of these two persons does not appear as employee of the Banyan Tree

IILM FOUNDAION,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT (EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1142/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

TDS Aarti Rai 29,750/- Dr. 6. From the above details, Assessing Officer inferred that these payments are in violation of Section 13(1)(c) read with section 13(3) and on these account the assessee is liable to lose its exemption. He further noted the name of these two persons does not appear as employee of the Banyan Tree

ADIT (E), NEW DELHI vs. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2675/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

TDS Aarti Rai 29,750/- Dr. 6. From the above details, Assessing Officer inferred that these payments are in violation of Section 13(1)(c) read with section 13(3) and on these account the assessee is liable to lose its exemption. He further noted the name of these two persons does not appear as employee of the Banyan Tree

ADIT(E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2871/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

TDS Aarti Rai 29,750/- Dr. 6. From the above details, Assessing Officer inferred that these payments are in violation of Section 13(1)(c) read with section 13(3) and on these account the assessee is liable to lose its exemption. He further noted the name of these two persons does not appear as employee of the Banyan Tree

G D EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. JCIT, RANGE- 1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3923/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 11Section 12Section 13Section 234

section 12 of I.T. Act, 1961 for the reason that the money collected from students & their guardians, etc., is not the voluntary contribution but the contractual levies & payments. 92. Therefore, the appellant is neither entitled to the benefit of exemption from incidence

G D EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. JCIT, RANGE- 1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3925/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 11Section 12Section 13Section 234

section 12 of I.T. Act, 1961 for the reason that the money collected from students & their guardians, etc., is not the voluntary contribution but the contractual levies & payments. 92. Therefore, the appellant is neither entitled to the benefit of exemption from incidence

G D EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. JCIT, RANGE- 1, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3924/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 11Section 12Section 13Section 234

section 12 of I.T. Act, 1961 for the reason that the money collected from students & their guardians, etc., is not the voluntary contribution but the contractual levies & payments. 92. Therefore, the appellant is neither entitled to the benefit of exemption from incidence

ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S. SPACE AGE RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, MEERUT

In the result Ground No. 1 and 3 of the appeal of the revenue is allowed and ground No

ITA 4622/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiacit, Space Age Research & Vs. Circle-2, Meerut Technology Foundation, Charitable Trust, Railway Road, Meerut Pan: Aabts7321M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjeev Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. SS Rana, CIT DR
Section 13(2)Section 13(3)Section 68

11 and 12 shall not apply if any income of the trust enures or used or apply directly or indirectly, for the benefit of persons specified under sub-section 3 of the act. Sub-section provides that without prejudice to the provisions of section 13(1)(c) the income of the trust shall be deemed to have been used

HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms, but in the circumstances, with

ITA/194/2004HC Delhi01 Aug 2016

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271

TDS under Section 194-I, as against Section 194-C of the Act, it was not open to the Appellant to re-agitate that issue in the penalty proceedings. However, the question framed by the Court gives the Appellant a second shot at the same question with reference to Clauses 11

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6316/DEL/2019[2014-15 Qtr 24 (Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6318/DEL/2019[2015-16 Qtr - 24(Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment

AVV ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 654/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6317/DEL/2019[2015-16 Qtr 24(Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6315/DEL/2019[2014-15(Qtr - 24 (Q-3))]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment

S vs. GUARDING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHIVS.ITO, TDS, WARD- 77(3), NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 647/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6312/DEL/2019[2014-15 Qtr 24(Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6314/DEL/2019[2014-15 Otr - 24 (Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment

CHRONICLE PUBLICATION PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (CPC)-TDS, NEW DELHI

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6311/DEL/2019[2013-14 Qtr - 24(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

11 6327/Del/2018 & Ors cases Assessment Year 2013-14 TO 2015-16 retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment