BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

197 results for “TDS”+ Section 10A(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore223Delhi197Mumbai171Chennai49Pune40Raipur38Hyderabad33Kolkata32Ahmedabad26Jaipur11Karnataka6Nagpur5Cochin5Cuttack4Surat4Rajkot4Indore4Varanasi2Visakhapatnam1Allahabad1Amritsar1Guwahati1Kerala1Panaji1Patna1Telangana1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 234E102Section 15475Section 200A75Section 10A63TDS56Addition to Income53Deduction38Disallowance36Section 143(3)32Section 80I

ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1) vs. SYSTEM AMERICA INDIA LTD.,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Department is dismissed

ITA 1492/DEL/2005[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Jul 2018AY 2001-2002

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 10A(9)Section 195Section 234BSection 250Section 35DSection 37(1)Section 80

7,00,500/- being ROC fee for the increase in the share capital, the ld. CIT(A) held that it was not an allowable deduction under section 35D of the Act. As regards to the remaining expenses, the learned CIT(A) observed that since the expenses were incurred for public issue but no public issue took place, therefore the expenditure

Showing 1–20 of 197 · Page 1 of 10

...
32
Rectification u/s 15427
Section 200A(1)26

SYSTEMS AMERICA (INDIA) LTD. vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Department is dismissed

ITA 905/DEL/2005[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Jul 2018AY 2001-2002

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 10A(9)Section 195Section 234BSection 250Section 35DSection 37(1)Section 80

7,00,500/- being ROC fee for the increase in the share capital, the ld. CIT(A) held that it was not an allowable deduction under section 35D of the Act. As regards to the remaining expenses, the learned CIT(A) observed that since the expenses were incurred for public issue but no public issue took place, therefore the expenditure

M/S. A.T. KEARNEY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result the ground No

ITA 511/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Sept 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishiat Kearney India Private Ito, Limited, Ward-1(1), Vs. 6Th Floor, Tower-D, Global New Delhi Business Park, Gurgaon Pan:Aadca1436G (Appellant) (Respondent) At Kearney India Private Ito, Limited, Ward-1(1), Vs. 6Th Floor, Tower-D, Global New Delhi Business Park, Gurgaon Pan:Aadca1436G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Ray, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 10A(7)Section 115JSection 147Section 148Section 80I

7) read with section 80IA(10) of the Act. 2.4. Based on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble CIT (A) has erred in not appreciating the various judicial precedents relied upon by the appellant in this regard. 2.5. Without prejudice to Grounds 2.1 to 2.4 above, based on the facts and circumstances

M/S. A.T. KEARNEY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result the ground No

ITA 510/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Sept 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishiat Kearney India Private Ito, Limited, Ward-1(1), Vs. 6Th Floor, Tower-D, Global New Delhi Business Park, Gurgaon Pan:Aadca1436G (Appellant) (Respondent) At Kearney India Private Ito, Limited, Ward-1(1), Vs. 6Th Floor, Tower-D, Global New Delhi Business Park, Gurgaon Pan:Aadca1436G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Ray, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 10A(7)Section 115JSection 147Section 148Section 80I

7) read with section 80IA(10) of the Act. 2.4. Based on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble CIT (A) has erred in not appreciating the various judicial precedents relied upon by the appellant in this regard. 2.5. Without prejudice to Grounds 2.1 to 2.4 above, based on the facts and circumstances

DIVYA CREATION,NOIDA vs. PR.CIT, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2715/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Divya Creation, Vs. Pr. Cit, Plot No. 97, Nsez, Noida Aayakar Bhawan, A2 D- Block, Sector 24, Noida Pan :Aadfd4879K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 195Section 263Section 40

TDS) under section 195 of the Act, (iv) that deduction under section 10A of the Act has been wrongly allowed on interest income of Rs.66,868,296/- on 4 various FDRs, which is not derived from the business of export. 2.2 Aggrieved with the finding of the Ld. CIT, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the grounds

NEC HCL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result we confirm the finding the of the CIT (A) regarding deletion of disallowance u/s 40a (i) of The Income tax Act of Rs

ITA 5497/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anuj Arora, CIT (DR)
Section 10ASection 10A(8)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

7,460,124. 2. the Hon'ble CIT(A) has erred in holding that since section 10A of the Act provides for an 'exemption', the losses, if any incurred by units eligible for benefit under section 10A should be treated as losses from a ' source exempt from tax' and therefore, is eligible for set off against Non- STPI income

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6757/DEL/2019[27Q/Quarter-2/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6759/DEL/2019[26Q/Quarter-1/2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE PRE- PRESS & PRINT PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 8623/DEL/2019[2014-15 (Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6754/DEL/2019[2014-15,26Q, Qtr-2]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6748/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26Q, Qtr-3]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6760/DEL/2019[26Q/Quarter-2/2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6750/DEL/2019[2013-14,27Q, Qtr-2]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6758/DEL/2019[27Q/Quarter-3/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6756/DEL/2019[26Q/Quarter-4/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6747/DEL/2019[26Q/Quarter-2/2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6749/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26Q, Qtr-4]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6755/DEL/2019[26Q/Quarter-3/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6753/DEL/2019[2014-15, 26Q,Qtr-1]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6752/DEL/2019[2014-15,24Q.Qtr-4]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019