BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

199 results for “TDS”+ Section 10A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore223Delhi199Mumbai173Chennai49Pune40Raipur38Kolkata33Hyderabad33Ahmedabad26Jaipur12Karnataka6Nagpur5Cochin5Cuttack4Surat4Rajkot4Indore4Varanasi2Visakhapatnam1Allahabad1Amritsar1Guwahati1Kerala1Panaji1Patna1Telangana1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 234E102Section 15475Section 200A75Section 10A61TDS58Addition to Income53Deduction37Disallowance36Section 80I32Section 143(3)

SYSTEMS AMERICA (INDIA) LTD. vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Department is dismissed

ITA 905/DEL/2005[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Jul 2018AY 2001-2002

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 10A(9)Section 195Section 234BSection 250Section 35DSection 37(1)Section 80

TDS was deducted while making payment for the said software, thus there was a default under the provision of Section 40(a) of the Act read with Section 195 of the Act. He, therefore, disallowed Rs. 26,49,045/-. 32. Being aggrieved the assessee carried the matter to the learned CIT(A) and submitted that the purchase of software could

Showing 1–20 of 199 · Page 1 of 10

...
31
Rectification u/s 15427
Section 200A(1)26

ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1) vs. SYSTEM AMERICA INDIA LTD.,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Department is dismissed

ITA 1492/DEL/2005[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Jul 2018AY 2001-2002

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 10A(9)Section 195Section 234BSection 250Section 35DSection 37(1)Section 80

TDS was deducted while making payment for the said software, thus there was a default under the provision of Section 40(a) of the Act read with Section 195 of the Act. He, therefore, disallowed Rs. 26,49,045/-. 32. Being aggrieved the assessee carried the matter to the learned CIT(A) and submitted that the purchase of software could

DIVYA CREATION,NOIDA vs. PR.CIT, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2715/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Divya Creation, Vs. Pr. Cit, Plot No. 97, Nsez, Noida Aayakar Bhawan, A2 D- Block, Sector 24, Noida Pan :Aadfd4879K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 195Section 263Section 40

TDS) under section 195 of the Act, (iv) that deduction under section 10A of the Act has been wrongly allowed on interest income of Rs.66,868,296/- on 4 various FDRs, which is not derived from the business of export. 2.2 Aggrieved with the finding of the Ld. CIT, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the grounds

IMSI INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5856/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Oct 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Jm Ita No. 5856/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 4277/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 5744/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 2506/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Imsi India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy/Assistant Commissioner C/O Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, Of Income Tax, Circle-2, 103, Ashoka Estate, Barakhamba Dehradun, Uttranchal Road, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabci1797A Assessee By : Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Sh. Sudhindra Jain & Sh. Alok Kumar Jain, Cas Revenue By : Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 15.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.10.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2007- 08 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 03.10.2011 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Ii, Dehradun & The Other Appeals Of The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 09.02.2012, 20.12.2011 & 30.11.2012 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Dehradun For The Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively. 2. Since The Issue Involved Is Common In All These Appeals Which Were Heard Together So These Are Being Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Sh. Sudhindra JainFor Respondent: Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. DR
Section 2Section 234BSection 80Section 80I

2(b) of Section 80IC of the Act, which provides that the activities of Information and Communication Technology Industry, Computer hardware, call centers to be eligible for deduction u/s 80IC of the Act. It was submitted that the assessee was engaged in the field of providing services of the Information and Communication Technology and its personnel were engaged to work

IMSI INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2506/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Jm Ita No. 5856/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 4277/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 5744/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 2506/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Imsi India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy/Assistant Commissioner C/O Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, Of Income Tax, Circle-2, 103, Ashoka Estate, Barakhamba Dehradun, Uttranchal Road, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabci1797A Assessee By : Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Sh. Sudhindra Jain & Sh. Alok Kumar Jain, Cas Revenue By : Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 15.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.10.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2007- 08 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 03.10.2011 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Ii, Dehradun & The Other Appeals Of The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 09.02.2012, 20.12.2011 & 30.11.2012 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Dehradun For The Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively. 2. Since The Issue Involved Is Common In All These Appeals Which Were Heard Together So These Are Being Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Sh. Sudhindra JainFor Respondent: Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. DR
Section 2Section 234BSection 80Section 80I

2(b) of Section 80IC of the Act, which provides that the activities of Information and Communication Technology Industry, Computer hardware, call centers to be eligible for deduction u/s 80IC of the Act. It was submitted that the assessee was engaged in the field of providing services of the Information and Communication Technology and its personnel were engaged to work

NEC HCL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result we confirm the finding the of the CIT (A) regarding deletion of disallowance u/s 40a (i) of The Income tax Act of Rs

ITA 5497/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anuj Arora, CIT (DR)
Section 10ASection 10A(8)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

10A of the Act since the STPI unit had reported losses. However, the taxable income was reduced to Nil after claiming set off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation. Notice under section 143(2) of the Act was issued. In response to the said notice, the Appellant furnished documentation/ information/ clarifications as requested by the AO during the course

M/S. A.T. KEARNEY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result the ground No

ITA 511/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Sept 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishiat Kearney India Private Ito, Limited, Ward-1(1), Vs. 6Th Floor, Tower-D, Global New Delhi Business Park, Gurgaon Pan:Aadca1436G (Appellant) (Respondent) At Kearney India Private Ito, Limited, Ward-1(1), Vs. 6Th Floor, Tower-D, Global New Delhi Business Park, Gurgaon Pan:Aadca1436G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Ray, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 10A(7)Section 115JSection 147Section 148Section 80I

2. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble CIT (A) has erred in confirming the action of the learned assessing officer in invoking Section 10A(7) read with Section 80IA(10) of the Act and thereby restricting the amount of deduction available under Section 10A

M/S. A.T. KEARNEY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result the ground No

ITA 510/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Sept 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishiat Kearney India Private Ito, Limited, Ward-1(1), Vs. 6Th Floor, Tower-D, Global New Delhi Business Park, Gurgaon Pan:Aadca1436G (Appellant) (Respondent) At Kearney India Private Ito, Limited, Ward-1(1), Vs. 6Th Floor, Tower-D, Global New Delhi Business Park, Gurgaon Pan:Aadca1436G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Ray, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 10A(7)Section 115JSection 147Section 148Section 80I

2. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble CIT (A) has erred in confirming the action of the learned assessing officer in invoking Section 10A(7) read with Section 80IA(10) of the Act and thereby restricting the amount of deduction available under Section 10A

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S XANSA INDIA LTD., NOIDA

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2283/DEL/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Ankur Garg, CIT DR
Section 10ASection 40Section 40a

2 of this Article, items of income beneficially owned by a resident of a Contracting State, wherever arising, other than income paid out of trusts or the estates of deceased persons in the course of administration, which are not dealt with in the foregoing Articles of this Convention, shall be taxable only in that State. 2. The provisions of paragraph

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6757/DEL/2019[27Q/Quarter-2/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6755/DEL/2019[26Q/Quarter-3/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6748/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26Q, Qtr-3]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6759/DEL/2019[26Q/Quarter-1/2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6760/DEL/2019[26Q/Quarter-2/2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6753/DEL/2019[2014-15, 26Q,Qtr-1]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6754/DEL/2019[2014-15,26Q, Qtr-2]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6752/DEL/2019[2014-15,24Q.Qtr-4]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6749/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26Q, Qtr-4]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6758/DEL/2019[27Q/Quarter-3/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 6751/DEL/2019[2013-14, 27Q, Qtr-4]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am [Through Video Conferencing]

For Appellant: Sh. M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M.Barnwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

10A, Nr Meenakshi Public School, Gurgaon PAN-AACF19005M 2 6748/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-3 3 6749/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 26Q Q-4 4 6750/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-2 5 6751/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2013-14 27Q Q-4 6752/Del/2019 -Do- -Do- 2014-15 24Q Q-4 6 7 6753/Del/2019