DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

seizure operation u/s 132 3 ITA-5515/Del/2025 & 13 others of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee on 20.09.2023. The assessment for A.Y. 2018-19 to A.Y. 2024-25 were completed under the following heads: i. Addition/ disallowance of purchase expenses u/s 37 ii. Addition on account of alleged sale

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 05, DELHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act') was carried out in the case of the assessee on 20.09.2023. The assessment for A.Y. 2018-19 to A.Y. 2024-25 were completed under the following heads: i. Addition/ disallowance of purchase expenses u/s 37 ii. Addition on account of alleged sale of tickets of events The above

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act') was carried out in the case of the assessee on 20.09.2023. The assessment for A.Y. 2018-19 to A.Y. 2024-25 were completed under the following heads: i. Addition/ disallowance of purchase expenses u/s 37 ii. Addition on account of alleged sale of tickets of events The above

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act') was carried out in the case of the assessee on 20.09.2023. The assessment for A.Y. 2018-19 to A.Y. 2024-25 were completed under the following heads: i. Addition/ disallowance of purchase expenses u/s 37 ii. Addition on account of alleged sale of tickets of events The above

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, DELHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act') was carried out in the case of the assessee on 20.09.2023. The assessment for A.Y. 2018-19 to A.Y. 2024-25 were completed under the following heads: i. Addition/ disallowance of purchase expenses u/s 37 Addition on account of alleged sale of tickets of events ii. The above

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, DELHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act') was carried out in the case of the assessee on 20.09.2023. The assessment for A.Y. 2018-19 to A.Y. 2024-25 were completed under the following heads: i. Addition/ disallowance of purchase expenses u/s 37 ii. Addition on account of alleged sale of tickets of events The above

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA, DELHI

Accordingly, ground number 7 of the appeal for assessment year 2011-12 is dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K.N.Chary

seizure action u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was carried out on 19.5.2010 in his case. The concerns which are controlled directly or indirectly by Shri Pawan Kumar Gupta are as under:- S.NO. Name of the person/concern Paras Sales Corporation Prop. Suresh Kumar 2 Yojana Engineers & Associates Prop, Sanjay 3 Balaji Enterprises Prop, Gaurav Gupta 4 M/s Rima

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. PARMINDER SINGH KALRA, NEW DELHI

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla

seizure operation was carried out on 28.07.2011 at the premises of the assessee on the basis of information received under information of exchange mechanism to the effect that the assessee owns an account at HSBC containing substantial credits which are not disclosed to the department. 6. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s 153A directing the assessee to file the return

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. PARMINDER SINGH KALRA, NEW DELHI

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla

seizure operation was carried out on 28.07.2011 at the premises of the assessee on the basis of information received under information of exchange mechanism to the effect that the assessee owns an account at HSBC containing substantial credits which are not disclosed to the department. 6. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s 153A directing the assessee to file the return

PARAMINDER SINGH KALRA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla

seizure operation was carried out on 28.07.2011 at the premises of the assessee on the basis of information received under information of exchange mechanism to the effect that the assessee owns an account at HSBC containing substantial credits which are not disclosed to the department. 6. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s 153A directing the assessee to file the return

PARAMINDER SINGH KALRA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla

seizure operation was carried out on 28.07.2011 at the premises of the assessee on the basis of information received under information of exchange mechanism to the effect that the assessee owns an account at HSBC containing substantial credits which are not disclosed to the department. 6. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s 153A directing the assessee to file the return

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. PARMINDER SINGH KALRA, NEW DELHI

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla

seizure operation was carried out on 28.07.2011 at the premises of the assessee on the basis of information received under information of exchange mechanism to the effect that the assessee owns an account at HSBC containing substantial credits which are not disclosed to the department. 6. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s 153A directing the assessee to file the return

PARMINDER SINGH KALRA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla

seizure operation was carried out on 28.07.2011 at the premises of the assessee on the basis of information received under information of exchange mechanism to the effect that the assessee owns an account at HSBC containing substantial credits which are not disclosed to the department. 6. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s 153A directing the assessee to file the return

PARMINDER SINGH KALRA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla

seizure operation was carried out on 28.07.2011 at the premises of the assessee on the basis of information received under information of exchange mechanism to the effect that the assessee owns an account at HSBC containing substantial credits which are not disclosed to the department. 6. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s 153A directing the assessee to file the return

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. PARMINDER SINGH KALRA, NEW DELHI

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukla

seizure operation was carried out on 28.07.2011 at the premises of the assessee on the basis of information received under information of exchange mechanism to the effect that the assessee owns an account at HSBC containing substantial credits which are not disclosed to the department. 6. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s 153A directing the assessee to file the return

AMARJIT MOTOR FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-26, NEW DELHI

In the result, the additions made in all the years are deleted and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

seizure of group companies of Shri Sanjay Bhandari and from there it has been gathered that the assessee-company was engaged in some accommodation entry. If that is the case, then what information or material pertaining to the Assessee Company was found or unearthed which was handed over the Assessing Officer. Another allegation is that this company is controlled

AMARJIT MOTOR FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-26, NEW DELHI

In the result, the additions made in all the years are deleted and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

seizure of group companies of Shri Sanjay Bhandari and from there it has been gathered that the assessee-company was engaged in some accommodation entry. If that is the case, then what information or material pertaining to the Assessee Company was found or unearthed which was handed over the Assessing Officer. Another allegation is that this company is controlled

AMARJIT MOTOR FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-26, NEW DELHI

In the result, the additions made in all the years are deleted and all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

seizure of group companies of Shri Sanjay Bhandari and from there it has been gathered that the assessee-company was engaged in some accommodation entry. If that is the case, then what information or material pertaining to the Assessee Company was found or unearthed which was handed over the Assessing Officer. Another allegation is that this company is controlled