BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

429 results for “TDS”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna468Delhi429Mumbai352Pune224Bangalore218Chennai163Indore151Kolkata125Cochin59Ahmedabad56Chandigarh55Hyderabad50Jaipur38Nagpur31Jabalpur27Lucknow25Karnataka24Raipur24Visakhapatnam23Surat19Agra17Jodhpur15Rajkot14Amritsar7Cuttack5Panaji4Allahabad4SC1Ranchi1Telangana1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 154227Section 234E85Section 143(1)69Section 200A61Rectification u/s 15459TDS57Section 143(3)49Addition to Income40Section 26339Deduction

AVIAXPERT PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 3(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as

ITA 87/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.87/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 बनाम Avia Xpert Pvt. Ltd. Ito, E-178, East Of Kailash, Vs. Ward 3(1), New Delhi. C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaica7960L अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 154(3)Section 36(1)(va)

rectification application u/s 154 of the Act against the 154 order dated 30/12/2018 passed by CPC requesting to allow the entire TDS

HERO FINCORP LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 11(1), DELHI, C.R. BUILDING

Showing 1–20 of 429 · Page 1 of 22

...
29
Disallowance28
Section 14721

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2542/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 251(1)Section 56(2)(viib)

rectification order under section 154 rectifying the\nassessment order wherein erroneous addition was made under section 56(2)(viib)\nof the Act despite the said section being not applicable to issuance of shares to non-\nresident investors.\n16. That the NFAC grossly erred on facts and in law in not appreciating that, since the\nshares were issued to non-residents

INSILCO LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 2586/DEL/2011[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Mar 2016AY 1993-94

Bench: : Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Sh. V.P. Gupta, Advocate &For Respondent: Sh. Surender Pal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 220Section 220(2)Section 244ASection 251

TDS amounting to Rs. 68,98,588/-, which related to the interest income included in A.Y. 1992-93 and consequently to allow the same now in A.Y. 1993-94. To this notice u/s 154 also assessee gave its "no objection" for proposed rectification

THE NEW VIKASH CO-OP. HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.,FARIDABAD vs. ITO,WARD-2(4), FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1472/DEL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2011-12] The New Vikash Co-Op. House Vs Ito, Building Society Ltd., Adv. Vijay Ward-Ii(4), Kumar Gupta, Opp. Jain Mandir, Faridabad. Main Bazar, Ballabgarh, Faridabad-121004. Pan-Aaajt1595P Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Vijay Kumar Gupta, Advocate Respondent By Shri Om Parkash, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21.07.2023

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 154Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)

TDS was not given while making calculations at the time of assessment u/s 143(3). Order u/s 154 was passed by the AO on 11.02.2014 and refund of Rs 1,84,880/ was issued to the assessee with the prior approval of Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax Range 1. Faridabad. 3. Further, Revenue Audit Party raised objection during audit observing

DIPANKAR MOHAN GHOSH,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1(3)(2) INT. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 6674/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri N.K. Choudhryassessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri U.N. Marwah, Ld. CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139Section 139oSection 147Section 148Section 154Section 154(3)Section 239Section 239(2)(c)Section 240Section 250

TDS) 4/80, Janpath, New Delhi New Delhi. PAN: AMRPG9569K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri U.N. Marwah, Ld. CA Shri Praveen Goel, Ld. Adv. Respondent by : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld. Sr. DR Date of hearing : 19.07.2022 Date of order : 26.07.2022 ORDER PER N.K. CHOUDHRY, J.M. This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 08.05.2019, impugned herein, passed

LUFTHANSA CARGO AG,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT(TDS), GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2711/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Dr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Sujit Ghosh AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Vizay B. Vasanta, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 201(1)

TDS was raised by the CPC vide order u/s 200A dated 09/06/2016. As per the rectification application u/s 154, the assessee

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 829/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 827/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1978/DEL/2012[2007-08 (F.Y. 2006-07)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 828/DEL/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1979/DEL/2012[2008-09 (F.Y. 2007-08)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1897/DEL/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

TDS), Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, U.P. Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. PIN : 201 204. U.P. U.P. U.P. U.P. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. PAN : AAACM2069E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Santosh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Respondent by : Shri P. Dam Kanunjna, Senior DR. Date of hearing

DCIT, GURGAON vs. SH. CHANCHAL SINGH DHEK, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5945/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Oct 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. R. K. Pandaand. Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2005-06 Dcit Vs. Sh. Chanchal Singh Dhek Circle -1 (1) Prop. M/S. Great Roadways Gurgaon Anaj Mandi Chowk, Gurgaon Pan No. Aaopd6087G (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143Section 154Section 194C(3)Section 40Section 44B

TDS was deducted by the assessee. He, therefore, issued a notice u/s. 154 of the IT Act. Since there was no compliance from the side of the assessee, the AO following the provisions of section 40 (a) (ia) made addition of Rs.1,66,43,120/- to the total income of the assessee and determined the total income at Rs.1

JAINCO DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 13(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5382/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumarm/S. Jainco Developers (P) Ltd, Vs. Acit, 8, New Rajdhani Enclave, Vikas Circle-13(1), Marg, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aabcj6893J

For Appellant: Shri Saurav Rohtagi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sandip Kumar Mishra, Sr. DR
Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(8)Section 234ASection 234B

rectification petition u/s 154 of the Act before the ld AO on 06.04.2015, which was disposed of beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 154(8) of the Act on 04.07.2017, rejecting the claim of the assessee on the following two grounds: – a. the return of income was filed by the assessee belatedly u/s 139(4) of the Act and hence

IYCWORLD SOFTINFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL - TDS

In the result, in ITA No. 906, 907 & 908/Del/2024 are allowed and ITA No

ITA 909/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Mahander Singh Dagar, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Parul Singh, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

rectification application pertaining to the same. Such fee was charged in the intimation issued u/s. 154 by CPC-TDS, Ghaziabad

IYCWORLD SOFTINFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL - TDS

In the result, in ITA No. 906, 907 & 908/Del/2024 are allowed and ITA No

ITA 906/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Mahander Singh Dagar, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Parul Singh, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

rectification application pertaining to the same. Such fee was charged in the intimation issued u/s. 154 by CPC-TDS, Ghaziabad

IYCWORLD SOFTINFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL - TDS

In the result, in ITA No. 906, 907 & 908/Del/2024 are allowed and ITA No

ITA 907/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Mahander Singh Dagar, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Parul Singh, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

rectification application pertaining to the same. Such fee was charged in the intimation issued u/s. 154 by CPC-TDS, Ghaziabad

IYCWORLD SOFTINFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL - TDS

In the result, in ITA No. 906, 907 & 908/Del/2024 are allowed and ITA No

ITA 908/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jun 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Mahander Singh Dagar, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Parul Singh, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

rectification application pertaining to the same. Such fee was charged in the intimation issued u/s. 154 by CPC-TDS, Ghaziabad

SANGAY CHODEN BHUTIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 70(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 624/DEL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHΜΑΝ (Accountant Member), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 37(1)

u/s. 154 are no longer available to the assessee, due to the fact that the tax deductor of the assessee has subsequently withdrawn the same for partially/fully”. He submitted that the expenditure disallowed by the CPC, if at all relating to advertisement expenditure and this being an Sangay Choden Bhutia vs. ITO expenditure then obligation is on the assessee

BATHLINE INDIA (PVT.) LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 9341/DEL/2019[2013-14 (26Q,Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 54

rectification application before the CPC and the order u/s 154 was passed on 11.02.2019. The assessee has filed the appeal against the order passed u/s 154 on 02.03.2019 which is well within the time. Even the ld.CIT(A) at para 4.2 of his order has also mentioned that the assessee has filed the appeal against the correction dated 11.02.2019. However