BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi829Mumbai773Jaipur242Chennai209Bangalore205Hyderabad184Kolkata135Ahmedabad119Indore116Chandigarh114Cochin106Rajkot61Pune51Surat41Calcutta35Visakhapatnam30Nagpur30Amritsar24Cuttack22Agra22Guwahati20Jodhpur17Raipur17Lucknow14Varanasi7Patna7SC4Dehradun4Allahabad3Karnataka3Telangana2Andhra Pradesh1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 153A8Section 143(3)4Section 133(6)4Reassessment4Addition to Income4Search & Seizure4Natural Justice4

SAURABH AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 28/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

undisclosed income found during the search operation, but also with regard to material available at the time of original assessment. Similar view was taken by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar in appeal No. 269 to 270 and appeal No. 15 to 17 wherein similar view was upheld. Accordingly, he rejected

RUKMAN AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 26/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

undisclosed income found during the search operation, but also with regard to material available at the time of original assessment. Similar view was taken by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar in appeal No. 269 to 270 and appeal No. 15 to 17 wherein similar view was upheld. Accordingly, he rejected

SHIV KUMAR AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 27/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

undisclosed income found during the search operation, but also with regard to material available at the time of original assessment. Similar view was taken by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar in appeal No. 269 to 270 and appeal No. 15 to 17 wherein similar view was upheld. Accordingly, he rejected

ABHISHEK AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 29/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

undisclosed income found during the search operation, but also with regard to material available at the time of original assessment. Similar view was taken by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar in appeal No. 269 to 270 and appeal No. 15 to 17 wherein similar view was upheld. Accordingly, he rejected